![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have an 8" LX200 GPS telescope ... and use a 2" star diagonal (and 1.25" adapter) with a 2" e.p. and a 1.25" e.p. My question is this: with that setup will adding on a focal reducer allow me to see a wider section of the sky, or is it as wide as it's going to get with using just the 2" diagonal. Many thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
have an 8" LX200 GPS telescope ... and use a 2" star diagonal (and
1.25" adapter) with a 2" e.p. and a 1.25" e.p. My question is this: with that setup will adding on a focal reducer allow me to see a wider section of the sky, or is it as wide as it's going to get with using just the 2" diagonal. Hi: Bit of confusion here... The 2" diagonal will allow you to see a bit wider field only because 1.25" eyepieces at long focal lengths are limited by their barrel diameter. So, yes, you get a bit more true field with a long focal length 2" eyepiece than a 1.25" one. OTOH, an f/6.3 r/c will deliver lower magnifications and wider fields with ALL eyepieces (you will need to stay under about 30mm with 2" eyepieces to avoid vignetting). Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
effective focal length telescope LX90 magnifier | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 16th 03 02:33 AM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Your opinions, please... | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | July 28th 03 04:30 AM |
Newbie Eyepieces 101 | BenignVanilla | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | July 21st 03 03:50 PM |