![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80...big-discovery/
"Physicists in Washington State and Louisiana recently spent two years hunting for the mysterious gravitational waves first predicted by Einstein, but detected nothing: zilch, zero, nada, nary a ripple. But that "null result" is itself of great value, researchers say, because it tells them where to look for the waves next." So "physicists in Washington State and Louisiana" are going to waste some more money but in the end Sir Martin Rees, capo di tutti capi in Einsteiniana, will put an end to their campaign: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected...ecfgravb28.xml "Did Einstein get all his sums right?.....Last week, an American probe began an 18-month mission to put Einstein's prediction to the test, 90 years after he unveiled his ideas in Berlin. Gravity Probe B was blasted into space from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on a Boeing Delta 2 rocket and will orbit the Earth for more than a year. The $700 million joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University, conceived in 1958, uses four of the most perfect spheres ever created inside the world's largest Thermos flask to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe.....Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said: "The project's a technical triumph, and a triumph of the persistence and lobbying power of Stanford University. But its gestation has been grotesquely prolonged, and the cost overruns have been equally gross. I recall hearing a talk about the project from Francis Everitt (principal investigator) when I was still a student – and it was already well advanced. "Back in the 1960s the evidence for Einstein's theory was meagre – just two tests, with 10 per cent precision. But relativity is now confirmed by several tests, with precision of one part in 10,000. It's still, in principle, good to have new and different tests. But the level of confidence in Einstein's theory is now so high that an announcement of the expected result will 'fork no lightening'. "Moreover, if there's an unexpected result, I suspect most people will suspect an error in this very challenging experiment rather than immediately abandon Einstein: There's now so much evidence corroborating Einstein, that a high burden of proof is required before he'll be usurped by any rival theory. "So the most exciting – if un-alluring – outcome of Gravity Probe B would be a request by Stanford University for another huge sum of money to repeat it." Of course, waste of money and destruction of human rationality never stop in Einsteiniana; some old forgotten "challenge" will be revitalized once the gravity wave campaign is over, for instance: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0105150837.htm "Physicists at Indiana University have developed a promising new way to identify a possible abnormality in a fundamental building block of Einstein's theory of relativity known as "Lorentz invariance." If confirmed, the abnormality would disprove the basic tenet that the laws of physics remain the same for any two objects traveling at a constant speed or rotated relative to one another." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80...big-discovery/ WHY PENTCHO VALEV IS IMMORTAL: http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di....html?sw=valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 27, 6:18*am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote: Pentcho Valev wrote: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80...avity-wave-hun... WHY PENTCHO VALEV IS IMMORTAL: *http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di....html?sw=valev WHY RELATIVITY IS IMMORTAL Well, it makes a little sense, anyway. As systems get more and more complex they take on the aspects of living beings. Relativity has probably attained that status by now. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80...big-discovery/ "Physicists in Washington State and Louisiana recently spent two years hunting for the mysterious gravitational waves first predicted by Einstein, but detected nothing: zilch, zero, nada, nary a ripple. But that "null result" is itself of great value, researchers say, because it tells them where to look for the waves next." So "physicists in Washington State and Louisiana" are going to waste some more money but in the end Sir Martin Rees, capo di tutti capi in Einsteiniana, will put an end to their campaign: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected...ecfgravb28.xml "Did Einstein get all his sums right?.....Last week, an American probe began an 18-month mission to put Einstein's prediction to the test, 90 years after he unveiled his ideas in Berlin. Gravity Probe B was blasted into space from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on a Boeing Delta 2 rocket and will orbit the Earth for more than a year. The $700 million joint mission between Nasa and Stanford University, conceived in 1958, uses four of the most perfect spheres ever created inside the world's largest Thermos flask to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe.....Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said: "The project's a technical triumph, and a triumph of the persistence and lobbying power of Stanford University. But its gestation has been grotesquely prolonged, and the cost overruns have been equally gross. I recall hearing a talk about the project from Francis Everitt (principal investigator) when I was still a student – and it was already well advanced. "Back in the 1960s the evidence for Einstein's theory was meagre – just two tests, with 10 per cent precision. But relativity is now confirmed by several tests, with precision of one part in 10,000. It's still, in principle, good to have new and different tests. But the level of confidence in Einstein's theory is now so high that an announcement of the expected result will 'fork no lightening'. "Moreover, if there's an unexpected result, I suspect most people will suspect an error in this very challenging experiment rather than immediately abandon Einstein: There's now so much evidence corroborating Einstein, that a high burden of proof is required before he'll be usurped by any rival theory. "So the most exciting – if un-alluring – outcome of Gravity Probe B would be a request by Stanford University for another huge sum of money to repeat it." Of course, waste of money and destruction of human rationality never stop in Einsteiniana; some old forgotten "challenge" will be revitalized once the gravity wave campaign is over, for instance: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0105150837.htm "Physicists at Indiana University have developed a promising new way to identify a possible abnormality in a fundamental building block of Einstein's theory of relativity known as "Lorentz invariance." If confirmed, the abnormality would disprove the basic tenet that the laws of physics remain the same for any two objects traveling at a constant speed or rotated relative to one another." Pentcho Valev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL
But you know, the humour will be lost on the crank Valev. All cranks take themselves sooooo seriously. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 03:20 PM |
DO RELATIVITY ZOMBIES UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | June 5th 07 12:14 AM |
ATTN: Anyone who wants to be Immortal | greysky | Misc | 1 | February 20th 07 06:51 PM |
Would you sell your immortal soul for a Questar? | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 18 | February 11th 06 12:48 AM |
Immortal Words of Velikovsky -- "WORLD IN COLLISION" | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 4 | July 1st 05 05:55 AM |