Polar Bears infact did bettter

Yes yes..they did...it was a question I posed months ago due to the obvious
colder '08 -'09 winter and prolonged
cool spring-summer. I had a hunch they would.

http://www.canada.com/Cool+summer+pr...977/story.html

On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:18:00 -0500, "S. Caro" wrote:

But don't WORRY. This horrible news can't go on forever. This cooling
is just a blip. Catastrophic global warming as predicted by the yet
unproven IPCC climate models will continue.

Gee, what a shocker! During a sustained warming trend you can get years
that are both above and below the trendline. How can that be? It defies
logic and reason! (Well, the logic and reason of some.)
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

You're full of.........

"Mick Toms" wrote in message
newsspjm.42164$PH1.15969@edtnps82...
Yes yes..they did...it was a question I posed months ago due to the
obvious colder '08 -'09 winter and prolonged
cool spring-summer. I had a hunch they would.

http://www.canada.com/Cool+summer+pr...977/story.html

On Aug 21, 4:35*pm, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:18:00 -0500, "S. Caro" wrote:
But don't WORRY. *This horrible news can't go on forever. *This cooling
is just a blip. *Catastrophic global warming as predicted by the yet
unproven IPCC climate models will continue. *

Gee, what a shocker! During a sustained warming trend you can get years
that are both above and below the trendline. How can that be? It defies
logic and reason! (Well, the logic and reason of some.)
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com

You can't explain the temperature oscillations globally using the
orbital points of January and July,you will mutter something about
'tilt to the orbital plane' as if it meant something.I suppose you are
like the other guy,it is too much work to figure out the actual role
for 'tilt' and allow the orbital dynamic allied with daily rotation to
set the background global climate conditions.

There are only two motions to take into account,daily rotation and
orbital motion and separately these motions have distinct
characteristics.Having cotton wool for brains,most here can't make
head nor tails of the specifics of orbital motion which is needed to
explain climate,the seasons and why the natural noon cycles vary.This
is why these reckless conclusions on carbon dioxide/global temeprature
are not just stupid but dangerous.

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...999/11/video/b

The reason why they turned a normal concern for pollution levels into
a global warming mess is that no astronomers are around to intervene
and tell these numbskulls that excluding everything except a
determination that carbon dioxide acts as a global temperature dial is
a far more dangerous conclusion than global warming itself.You think
astronomers look through magnification glass and droll over every
conceptual junk empiricists dump into the celestial arena when there
should be guys gettings tuck in to these dumb conclusions which put
humanity on a guilt trip or use the conclusion for social tyranny.