![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Indianaradio" wrote in message
... Does Celestron make 8 or 10" Dob's anymore? I can't seem to find them anywhere. Thanks for the help. No, they discontinued them a few years ago. Pity though. They had some really nice features, but a few fatal design flaws. I had an 8" which only gave satisfactory images one night. The diagonal was too small, retained too much heat, and was hard/impossible to position properly. Cheers, Larry G. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does Celestron make 8 or 10" Dob's anymore? I can't seem to find them
anywhere. Hi: Long gone. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"LarryG" wrote in message ...
"Indianaradio" wrote in message ... Does Celestron make 8 or 10" Dob's anymore? I can't seem to find them anywhere. Thanks for the help. No, they discontinued them a few years ago. Pity though. They had some really nice features, but a few fatal design flaws. I had an 8" which only gave satisfactory images one night. The diagonal was too small, retained too much heat, and was hard/impossible to position properly. I think that review in S&T a few years back killed a lot of dob lines. Celestron = gone. Meade = No small dobs. Bushnell = Pretty much gone. http://teleskopservice.de/gsseiten/testbericht8zdob.htm Max "Gone.gone.gone.gone.gone.dobbydobby.gone" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"LarryG" wrote in message ...
The diagonal was too small, retained too much heat, and was hard/impossible to position properly. Interesting--S&T praised the 8" model for a tube design that minimized heat distortion. The Meade (also discontinued AFAIK) was the one with the major heat problem. All-in-all, though, S&T didn't give more than a lukewarm thumbs-up. Translation: better than the Bushnell. They found spherical aberration--not the first time for a Celestron Dob--and panned the sorry excuse for an "imitation finderscope." The impression i got was that neither Meade nor Celestron took the Dob market seriously. It was as if they believed that for a cheap, often home-made design, quality was unimportant. (Gee whiz, people, if we wanted bad quality in a cheap package, the shopping mall is just up the road.) Clear skies! -- ------------------- Richard Callwood III -------------------- ~ U.S. Virgin Islands ~ USDA zone 11 ~ 18.3N, 64.9W ~ ~ eastern Massachusetts ~ USDA zone 6 (1992-95) ~ --------------- http://cac.uvi.edu/staff/rc3/ --------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|