commonsense argument in favor of Dirac's multiplicative-creation --

Let us examine our solar system for clues as to
whether there is Dirac's multiplicative creation. If
Dirac's multiplicative creation is true then the satellites of planets
would be tugged away from
those parent planets and sent into a path towards
the Sun. If Dirac's multiplicative creation is false,
then the probability of a satellite being swallowed
by the parent planet is rather a high probability considering tidal
friction.

So if we look at our Solar System and ask whether
any satellite is in danger of being swallowed by
parent planet we must conclude none are in that
danger. In fact, every satellite, even Io of Jupiter
is receding away from its parent planet.

So if Dirac's Multiplicative-Creation is true, then there should be no
evidence of a spiralling inward
orbit of a satellite that is heading for a swallowing
by its parent planet. And there is none in our Solar
System. About the only swallowing candidate is
Mercury by the Sun. And that is in agreement with
the Multiplicative-Creation, that the tug of the Sun
should be the dominant tug in our solar system.
And the first planet to be lost to the Sun is going to
be Mercury. And that a future time of billions years
hence, that our solar system will have just two
objects, the Sun and Jupiter about to become a twin
star to the Sun.

There is nothing in mainstream physics or astronomy to account for the
reason that no
satellite is spiralling inwards to be swallowed by
its parent planet. And mainstream physics should
have accounted for this assailant fact and observation. It does not
prove Dirac's multiplicative
creation but it surely supports it in a drastic measure.

If Dirac's multiplicative-creation was false, then
we should expect half the satellites in our solar
system to be ramping up for a collision with their
parent planet. We see none of this. In fact, even
the worst satellites as to a parent planet tug-- Io
of Jupiter, that its orbit is receding to that of Jupiter.

This indicates that the overall forces going on in our
Solar System is the Multiplicative Creation which has all the orbits
of planets and satellites tugged
in the direction of the Sun.

Sometimes in science the most obvious of facts
about the world we live in are grossly ignored. Since
Kepler and Galileo and Newton there must have been thousands of
scientists who asked themselves, why no satellites spiralling into
their
parent planet?

And ever since Newton of 1687, noone has answered that question or
pondered the question
in broad daylight-- why no satellites swallowed by
parent planets? The answer is that Dirac's
multiplicative-creation is ongoing and drives all
satellites away from their parent planet.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Jul 28, 1:55*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Let us examine our solar system for clues as to
whether there is Dirac's multiplicative creation. If
Dirac's multiplicative creation is true then the satellites of planets
would be tugged away from
those parent planets and sent into a path towards
the Sun. If Dirac's multiplicative creation is false,
then the probability of a satellite being swallowed
by the parent planet is rather a high probability considering tidal
friction.

So if we look at our Solar System and ask whether
any satellite is in danger of being swallowed by
parent planet we must conclude none are in that
danger. In fact, every satellite, even Io of Jupiter
is receding away from its parent planet.

So if Dirac's Multiplicative-Creation is true, then there should be no
evidence of a spiralling inward
orbit of a satellite that is heading for a swallowing
by its parent planet. And there is none in our Solar
System. About the only swallowing candidate is
Mercury by the Sun. And that is in agreement with
the Multiplicative-Creation, that the tug of the Sun
should be the dominant tug in our solar system.
And the first planet to be lost to the Sun is going to
be Mercury. And that a future time of billions years
hence, that our solar system will have just two
objects, the Sun and Jupiter about to become a twin
star to the Sun.

There is nothing in mainstream physics or astronomy to account for the
reason that no
satellite is spiralling inwards to be swallowed by
its parent planet. And mainstream physics should
have accounted for this assailant fact and observation. It does not
prove Dirac's multiplicative
creation but it surely supports it in a drastic measure.

If Dirac's multiplicative-creation was false, then
we should expect half the satellites in our solar
system to be ramping up for a collision with their
parent planet. We see none of this. In fact, even
the worst satellites as to a parent planet tug-- Io
of Jupiter, that its orbit is receding to that of Jupiter.

This indicates that the overall forces going on in our
Solar System is the Multiplicative Creation which has all the orbits
of planets and satellites tugged
in the direction of the Sun.

Sometimes in science the most obvious of facts
about the world we live in are grossly ignored. Since
Kepler and Galileo and Newton there must have been thousands of
scientists who asked themselves, why no satellites spiralling into
their
parent planet?

And ever since Newton of 1687, noone has answered that question or
pondered the question
in broad daylight-- why no satellites swallowed by
parent planets? The answer is that Dirac's
multiplicative-creation is ongoing and drives all
satellites away from their parent planet.

Archimedes Plutoniumwww.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

--- quoting from Wikipedia on the precession of Mercury perihelion---

Sources of the precession of perihelion for Mercury

Amount (arcsec/century)
Cause

5025.6
Coordinate (due to the precession of the equinoxes)

531.4
Gravitational tugs of the other planets

0.0254
Oblateness of the Sun (quadrupole moment)

42.98±0.04
General relativity

5600.0
Total

5599.7
Observed
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

Funny how scientists of the past century were able to knock themselves
out
and over on the components of Mercury precession of perihelion, but
when
it came time to analyze the components of a 3.8 cm/year Moon recession
from Earth, it was left untouched as a monolith of just tidal friction
and
no word about Dirac's multiplicative-creation.

In the Atom Totality theory there is no need or room for General
Relativity which
becomes nothing but the Dirac ocean of positrons as Space itself. So
gravity is
the attraction, albeit weak attraction, of the positron Space upon the
ordinary matter
of Space (which happens to be electron matter of Atom Totality). So
you see, a positron
attracts a electron because they are opposite in sign and thus gravity
is this
EM attraction of space itself with the matter in that space.

So if we dispense of GR as not needed, then how do we explain the
precession of
Mercury perihelion?

Well, I wonder if the units of measure of the above of 42.98±0.04 is
of the
same order of magnitude as 2 cm/year recession of Mercury towards the
Sun?

In other words, I replace arcs of precession with that of distance of
recession due
to multiplicative-creation.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies