Axis Tilting?

Over the past several months I have been working on a CGI movie
to demonstrate the error of a theory I have been seeing in various
forms across the internet - namely that the Earth's axis has changed
from its known value of 23.439° to some other sometimes extreme
value. Oh, and of course, that this knowledge is also somehow
suppressed.

I invite everyone to take a look at the video on my website:

http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Axis/axis.html

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On 6/12/2009 9:32 PM, Skywise wrote:
Over the past several months I have been working on a CGI movie
to demonstrate the error of a theory I have been seeing in various
forms across the internet - namely that the Earth's axis has changed
from its known value of 23.439° to some other sometimes extreme
value. Oh, and of course, that this knowledge is also somehow
suppressed.

I invite everyone to take a look at the video on my website:

http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Axis/axis.html

Nice video!

Note your AVI video also plays fine with the VLC media player on any system
(Linux, MacOS X, Solaris, UNIX, Windows {2K, XP, Vista, 7}, etc).

The VLC player is available free as executables or source from:

http://www.videolan.org/vlc/

and it's also arguably the best player for DVDs, CDs, mp3s, MPEG-1 to -4, etc.

On Jun 13, 5:32*am, Skywise wrote:
Over the past several months I have been working on a CGI movie
to demonstrate the error of a theory I have been seeing in various
forms across the internet - namely that the Earth's axis has changed
from its known value of 23.439° to some other sometimes extreme
value. Oh, and of course, that this knowledge is also somehow
suppressed.

I invite everyone to take a look at the video on my website:

http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Axis/axis.html

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

That is just the type of animation I am looking for with a ramped up
type of reasoning to bring graphics in line with observational data.

The 'tilt' does not cause the seasons,the specific way the Earth
orbits the Sun causes the seasons with 'tilt' determining whether a
planet has equatorial or polar-like seasons.I prefer actual
observations to animations but everyone is not suited to handle time
lapse footage at that level so animation is just fine -

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...999/11/video/b

To show why certain constellations disappear over the course of an
annual orbit due to the specific way a planet orbits the Sun,drop all
references to daily rotation and concentrate on how the planet turns
with respect to the Sun for the seasonal disappearance of certain
stars has nothing whatsoever to do with daily rotation.The problem is
that 'sidereal time' injects a daily rotational cause into stellar
positions by trying to justify everything through daily rotation.

Excellent video which shows what an astrologically infected view of
the celestial arena looks like,it just takes a small leap to put these
things to better use.

Thad Floryan wrote in
:

Nice video!

Thanks.


Note your AVI video also plays fine with the VLC media player on any
system (Linux, MacOS X, Solaris, UNIX, Windows {2K, XP, Vista, 7}, etc).

The VLC player is available free as executables or source from:

Oh yes. I use VLC for those tough to play videos. So that's a
second vote from me.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

oriel36 wrote in news:0f43b474-50cb-44ed-a60e-
:

That is just the type of animation I am looking for...

Be careful what you wish for, Gerald Quixote Kelleher.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On Jun 13, 7:35*am, Skywise wrote:
oriel36 wrote in news:0f43b474-50cb-44ed-a60e-
:

That is just the type of animation I am looking for...

Be careful what you wish for, Gerald Quixote Kelleher.

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Go ahead,use animation to explain the seasonal disappearance of
certain constellations.

You will find that if you use daily rotation as a means to define the
positional movement of stars (3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each night)
it will come into conflict with the orbital dynamic which actually
causes certain stars to be obscured by the Sun over the course of a
year.

In the absence of any animation to carry the point for the specific
orbital motion,I was forced to use an animation of how the orientation
of a crank pin around a central shaft keeps the same orientation
(representing daily rotation) while it turns to the central Sun -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV9WkQkUHZ4

I need an animation which applies the same reasoning to the Earth in
respect to the seasonal appearance and disappearance of certain stars
due to the orbital motion of the planet,if you get into trouble then
use the real observations as a guideline along with the animation
above -

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...999/11/video/b

Think you can handle that ?.

366.25 rotations create 365.25 days
so that our
365 days is 366 rotations
and leap year of
366 days is 367 rotations.
Thus 4 years has 4 more rotations than days.
Very simple math in geometry and algebra.
All cycles vary by a whole number 1, that is what
makes it a true cycle.

The difference between Venus and Earth is
one per year so that what appears to be 5 orbits
in 8 years is instead 13 orbits.
Recognize the geometric laws and your math wont be wrong.

The axis of the Earth is calculated in astronomy programs
as being over 24 degrees in 2350 BC.
Further some confusion to some people occurs not as
25 degrees but as 25 feet within the north pole.
The north pole is the center of the actual circle that the
axis makes in the surface of the Earth.

Nice animation, but you can do that with a star globe.
Shame no one wanted me to do it, they all whined
(without seeing what i have done)
whined about threats of copy right.

Its vain to think the axis has tilted now unnoticed
not because of stars but because if we shifted for example
to 49 degrees then the artic circle would move from
66.5 to 51 and putting most of Canada (49th parallel)
into 24 hour winter darkness and 24 hour summer days.
We would all notice our sun was scraping the south
in winter and almost north in summer.

So with the sun an easier observation than the stars,
why the big animation on stars.
ELIJAH

On Jun 12, 10:32*pm, Skywise wrote:
that the Earth's axis has changed
from its known value of 23.439° to some other sometimes extreme
value. Oh, and of course, that this knowledge is also somehow
suppressed.

If you're thinking of stuff like 5/5/2000 and The Hab Theory, the
notion was that the Earth's axis stayed the same way, but the Earth's
crust moved radically while most of the Earth's mass still conserved
angular momentum.

John Savard