![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a few ideas to throw into the global pot for consideration.
After their useful lives, some satellites can deorbit with chemical or ion rockets or deploy vary large sails to increase their drag coefficient or be perturbed by the solar wind. Another method could be to extend long cables to use the Earth’s magnetic field to induce drag. However, all these require active systems installed on the junk and be commanded to deploy. The only methods for getting rid of space debris is to either go up there and get it, or wait a very long time for it to decay out or hit something else and hope that the resulting debris ends up with lower velocities that will decay quickly and not contribute to the cascade effect. Matching an orbit to be able to retrieve something is horrendously costly in fuel and really not practical except for large or valuable pieces in really inconvenient orbits. My idea would be to scale-up Stardust's aerogel capture system and deploy kilometre-sized megafoams in orbits designed to intersect as many debris fields as possible. While probably not able to capture most debris, one or more collisions could reduce their kinetic energy substantially to aid quicker reentry. Any foam shrapnel produced should be relatively harmless and decay very quickly. I can't imagine any process that could create kilometre-scale aerogels on Earth, let alone in-situ! A few tons of foaming agents could be shipped up in batches and then mixed together when the right quantities are reached. Foams would expand massively in a vacuum if the bubbles in the material could remain gastight under the extreme stretching. Space would be a very harsh environment for foam, as they would deform a lot depending on temperature so some pretty amazing materials would need to be used. Many shapes are possible - either big amorphous blobs, tentacular tangles or more structured lattices. If foams are extruded while being formed they could make long continuous tentacles. These could also be used instead of sails as aerobrakes for deorbiting. I imagine enormous structures could be made in space with just a few tons of materials. They would have to start off in high orbits because their own orbital decay would be substantial. Maintaining altitude and manoeuverability would be difficult using rockets, especially after absorbing unknown amounts of angular kinetic energy from the collisions it is looking for! If the foaming material has a high enough albedo or aluminized, they could provide usable night illumination too. If we make thousands of them, perhaps they could also reduce insolation by a useful amount as well. The foam would have to be environmentally benign for reentry. If it didn't burn up it would shrink massively with increasing atmospheric pressure. If enough survives, it might even preserve anything it caught. NASA know an awful lot about foam now, anyone from NASA like to comment on feasibility? How easy would it be to make foams in a vacuum? Andy Lee Robinson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
space junk?? comet? what is it ? | MasterMind | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 2nd 07 12:49 AM |
How bad will the Space Junk problem get? | [email protected] | Policy | 12 | February 8th 07 02:21 AM |
Jettisoned space junk -- how big? | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 48 | June 29th 06 06:56 PM |
Jettisoned space junk -- how big? | Jim Oberg | History | 59 | June 29th 06 06:56 PM |
sci.space.news junk | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 4 | February 21st 06 06:57 AM |