![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The subject of STS-125 and the Hubble's orbit came up on another group.
I misremembered it being in an equatorial orbit when of course (duh) it was launched into the same inclination as the 28.5-deg latitude of the Cape. But this got me to wondering why they didn't put Hubble in an equatorial orbit, considering the possible benefits of less complicated celestial tracking and orbital issues such as precession. Was the 28.5-deg orbit chosen mainly because the Shuttle doesn't have the fuel capacity to do an equatorial dog-leg maneuver, even with the assist of the OMS during the launch phase, with a payload as massive as Hubble? Could the Shuttle have used the OMS engines to make an orbital plane change from a temporary 28.5-deg orbit into an equatorial one before releasing the Hubble? Perhaps the answer is they would have if they could have. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100,000th orbit for Hubble Space Telescope | Eric Chomko[_2_] | Policy | 0 | August 11th 08 10:02 PM |
100,000th orbit for Hubble Space Telescope | Eric Chomko[_2_] | History | 0 | August 11th 08 10:02 PM |
Orbit Data of the Optical Inter-orbit Communications Engineering Test Satellite | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | August 24th 05 01:25 PM |
$300 Million to Study How to Safely De-Orbit Hubble? | BenignVanilla | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | March 3rd 04 11:12 AM |