Objective Reality

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:05:00 -0800, ^MisterJingo^ wrote:

everything is connected. the physical mind creates difference because our
reality is linear. it takes OneNess and adds separation.

Being part of totality (based on your assumption) what happened to
allow difference to occur? I understand the point about the mind
forming perception, but how did mind get the momentum to form from the
state of 'oneness' to differentiate anything from the whole? Either
the mind is separate from totality (which makes no logical sense -
admittedly logic might break down on such a level) or totality is by
nature not a settled state that we consider it to be. Or perhaps the
mind is totality?

logic/Linearity breaks down and unites with non-linearity/Creativity. the
MIND - the union between the MINDS - represents totality . .



An eternal state of perfectly uniform oneness. How did the mind form
from this state, if nothing 'changed', to form perceptions based on the
totality? If something did change, how and why? Also can something be
perceived from nothing? A program written to detect differentiation in
colour, it's input mechanism is a camera pointed at a uniform white
light. Even as a separate entity (to the source/light), the program
would never record data to indicate change – as nothing changes.
Before someone jumps in and says imagination or mind could create the
change, imagination and the mind are part of the oneness (are the
oneness and so have no separate reality or momentum) and in a settled
state.

OneNess only means connection, rather than lack of change. our perception
is inherently deterministic and linear; totally non-random. Pure-Energy
flows into itself forming totality/infinity/zero/8. the non-dimensional
point is pure randomness - a constant flow of energy.

I'm not getting the idea across which I have. But it's something like
this. Oneness would remain 'oneness' unless an 'external' force caused
change in its state - but this would be impossible based upon that
definition of oneness, as everything is one and in a static state and so
nothing changes. Perhaps oneness is not uniform; perhaps it is a
broiling mass of everything all at the same time/ Not a settled state at
all.

EXACTLY! i suppose the external force is literally the Creator of
Everything . . i personally have no idea . . but i believe humanity will
one day answer all these questions, provided that we don't split
totality(the atom) and destroy ourselves before we have a chance to figure
all this stuff out.


And now I feel I'm typing gibberish perhaps ;p

Jingo - bored at work

gibberish - the language of God

reotpreeoj wrote in a reply:

gibberish - the language of God

I spend at least 2 hours each day talking
in such a way. It works miracles with my
ease of functionality for the other 22
hours.

Very small example follows:

shifin luddle wimple neukin meachiya
hoofit chinkel noppa.

and...

ENESSA QUA ONNICA

and so on and so on and scubee dobie do OH!




The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:33:41 +0000, Saint Isidore of Laytonville wrote:

I spend at least 2 hours each day talking
in such a way. It works miracles with my
ease of functionality for the other 22
hours.

Very small example follows:

shifin luddle wimple neukin meachiya
hoofit chinkel noppa.

and...

ENESSA QUA ONNICA

and so on and so on and scubee dobie do OH!

in an Infinite Universe the probability that your gibberish was, is, or
will be an actual language approaches One.

..weoiweh-jiweie-weuriruiwe-winweiee-eonfwqueot.
..ekrobobJern-OIenrwnqiWO-eoiqwoiq-wionwinqwwe????.

reotpreeoj (ul udilshu seda vuni mon) saledem nivosha
sus:

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:33:41 +0000, Saint Isidore of Laytonville wrote:

I spend at least 2 hours each day talking
in such a way. It works miracles with my
ease of functionality for the other 22
hours.

Very small example follows:

shifin luddle wimple neukin meachiya
hoofit chinkel noppa.

and...

ENESSA QUA ONNICA

and so on and so on and scubee dobie do OH!

in an Infinite Universe the probability that your gibberish was, is, or
will be an actual language approaches One.

.weoiweh-jiweie-weuriruiwe-winweiee-eonfwqueot.
.ekrobobJern-OIenrwnqiWO-eoiqwoiq-wionwinqwwe????.

Ji nome ha vada dil shu ubiosha (mo saleda) lafius sha ji dalai dumashai. Ha
najidum misushaluba alt.language.artificial. Dos ruvasha!

There are many of us out there who speak (and write) gibberish which is
indeed a true language. We meet on the newsgroup alt.language.artificial.
Take a look!

--
Paul Townsend
I put it down there, and when I went back to it, there it was GONE!

Interchange the alphabetic elements to reply

Pretty good do-whap

"Saint Isidore of Laytonville" wrote in message
...
reotpreeoj wrote in a reply:

gibberish - the language of God

I spend at least 2 hours each day talking
in such a way. It works miracles with my
ease of functionality for the other 22
hours.

Very small example follows:

shifin luddle wimple neukin meachiya
hoofit chinkel noppa.

and...

ENESSA QUA ONNICA

and so on and so on and scubee dobie do OH!




The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me

AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA

"Saint Isidore of Laytonville" wrote in message
...
reotpreeoj wrote in a reply:

gibberish - the language of God

I spend at least 2 hours each day talking
in such a way. It works miracles with my
ease of functionality for the other 22
hours.

Very small example follows:

shifin luddle wimple neukin meachiya
hoofit chinkel noppa.

Hey, I'm always looking for new words! Could you send me a nice long list?

-- Charlie Springer