![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a
Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. News also mentioned that the surface was tacky and left imprints of the airbag and that there was black minerals in the imprints. Perhaps those black minerals are coal granules. What would happen to a tree trunk if uprooted on Earth and spaceshipped to the Martian surface? Would it slowly rot and decay physically? What are the chances that if Earth were Mars and a probe landed on Earth, what are the probability chances of running into a coal seam or evidence of coal? I say small chance and that it would take a living explorer and not a probe to find coal on Earth. If coal is found on Mars and if no coal exists on the Moon, then I will have to come up with a CellWell explanation for that. Something like this--. That Mars was with Earth in CellWell1 but the Moon was in CellWell2 and the Moon was 1/2 as old as Earth. And so the Moon was some satellite of the gas giants and escaped the gas giants and collided with Earth between 5 and 2 billion years ago. If coal is found on Mars, then I will have to introduce a whole new kinematics theory of planetory orbits where Europa is like a protoEarth and where Pluto is like a protoMars. The tough thing about this kinematics is to explain why and how the **gas giants** move into erratic and aberrant motions to where they eventually coalesce and collide several gas giants to form a new star or add on to the Sun, but why the satellites of these gas giants seem to wander and escape the collisions? Is there a physicist out there who can answer in a nice way as to why satellites would have a tendency to wander and escape a swallowing up of their gas giant parents? My intuition would tell me that if you had big balls and little marbles going around the big balls and if the big balls come together in one place (swallowing up) that the marbles should also be swallowed up and not escape the swallowing. Perhaps there is some tendency that I am forgetting about. Perhaps the behaviour of Pluto as it seems to be escaping from the errant wandering of Neptune, lies the answer. Archimedes Plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless there are bacteria and fungi on Mars, it wouldn't "rot and decay."
-- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33° 27' 59" N, 117° 05' 53" W |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Curtis Croulet" wrote in message ... Unless there are bacteria and fungi on Mars, it wouldn't "rot and decay." They would be present in the uprooted tree. But could they survive? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message om... It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. Are you a kook? News also mentioned that the surface was tacky and left imprints of the airbag and that there was black minerals in the imprints. Perhaps those black minerals are coal granules. You really believe that Mars had forests, vast vegetative cover, etc.? rest of stuff cut for sanity |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
martin wrote:
"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message om... It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. Are you a kook? News also mentioned that the surface was tacky and left imprints of the airbag and that there was black minerals in the imprints. Perhaps those black minerals are coal granules. You really believe that Mars had forests, vast vegetative cover, etc.? rest of stuff cut for sanity New here, Martin? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Archimedes Plutonium wrote: It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. Before we jump to this conclusion let us find out if there was ever any kind of life on Mars. At this juncture there is not an iota of evidence indicating that Mars was ever an abode of life. Bob Kolker |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom McDonald" wrote in message ... martin wrote: "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message om... It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. Are you a kook? News also mentioned that the surface was tacky and left imprints of the airbag and that there was black minerals in the imprints. Perhaps those black minerals are coal granules. You really believe that Mars had forests, vast vegetative cover, etc.? rest of stuff cut for sanity New here, Martin? yep I'd be waiting for Ed to post he had found human remains in the coal seams |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
martin wrote:
"Tom McDonald" wrote in message ... martin wrote: "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message om... [snip] New here, Martin? yep I'd be waiting for Ed to post he had found human remains in the coal seams (What follows was cribbed from Kibo, who was here before all.) Archie-Poo was a cashier and then a dishwasher. He started at Dartmouth's Hanover Inn about 1990 (his previous employer was a relative of the manager of the Inn so he got a good reference, he's said) and about 1993 started posting to various sci.* newsgroups. He maintains he took the job at Dartmouth (paying $7/hour when the relationship ended in 1999) to get access to Dartmouth's campus computers, which is odd because he took the job about three years before he discovered the the campus computers. He was "Ludwig Plutonium" when he started posting in 1993; previously he was "Ludwig van Ludvig" and before that "Ludwig Hansen" [adopted name] and "Ludwig Poehlmann" [birth name]. When he posted about a run-in with some cops it was clear that the "legal" name changes he effected weren't effective, because the cops looked him up as "Ludwig Hansen". He is also struts as "The King Of Science And Logic," a title he awarded himself. Archie-Poo's hot topics include (a) he invented spaghetti, (b) Allen Greenspan controls OPEC's oil price increases, (c) he's trying to install three wood stoves in his "homestead", and (d) he likes candy of various kinds. (d) seems to be the one he comes back to the most. Around 1998 he explained that the fact that he had a craving for shredded coconut proved his theory that the Universe was a giant plutonium atom that was making him superintelligent because the center of his brain also contains a plutonium atom, unlike the rest of us who have a carbon atom at the center of our brains. Archie-Poo is a swine. Archie-Poo is a vulgar little maggot. Archie-Poo is a worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas, Archie-Poo couldn't pour **** out of a boot with instructions printed on the heel. Archie-Poo is a canker, an ulcerous sore that won't go away. I would rather watch Affirmative Action lawyers suck-start Harleys with their bungholes than suffer the troll abominations of Archie-Poo. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (Do something naughty to physics) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier today I wrote:
Is there a physicist out there who can answer in a nice way as to why satellites would have a tendency to wander and escape a swallowing up of their gas giant parents? My intuition would tell me that if you had big balls and little marbles going around the big balls and if the big balls come together in one place (swallowing up) that the marbles should also be swallowed up and not escape the swallowing. Perhaps there is some tendency that I am forgetting about. Perhaps the behaviour of Pluto as it seems to be escaping from the errant wandering of Neptune, lies the answer. And coming to think about it more and more, I figure that the Solar System, unlike electrons orbiting a nucleus, constantly lose energy and gravitate towards the center of the SolarSystem which would be the Sun. But since the decrease in orbits is uneven a twin star may emerge from the coalescence of the gasgiants. But in this breaking down of gasgiant orbits do the moons of the gasgiants luckily escape the Swallowing? I can see where perhaps 1/2 of the satellites of the gasgiants of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune could escape the Swallowment. Because their orbit around their gas giant is on the farside when that gasgiant is pulled each "periodic year" into this decreasing orbit of the SolarSystem. And some periodic-years where say Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus are aligned in their orbit where the pull on Neptune is so large that Neptune violently breaks its old orbit and is pulled further away from its moon of Pluto. I do not know how many gasgiants existed in CellWell1 where the Sun remains as the Swallowment and where Mercury, Venus Earth and Mars were the lucky moons that escaped their gas giant parent. Looking at CellWell2 of the gasgiants of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune that by the time of their Swallowment they would be a tiny new star, but a supercomputer could figure out where in our SolarSystem this second star would be created. And would Europa be spared of swallowment? Pluto would be spared for it already has the orbital status of a planet itself when it was some billion years ago still a moon of Neptune. So in the above I feel there is the innate mechanics in all SolarSystems for their wandering gasgiants to coalesce and form a new star and that their satellites wander alone and becoming fullfledged planets. Keep in mind that Solarsystems keep growing in mass every day from the cosmic rays shot from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality and so by the day of Swallowment for Jupiter and the gasgiants of CellWell2, they will be many times more massive than at present and result in a newly shining small star. That is the reason why we see so many exoplanets in alien solarsystems of having such huge massive exoplanets circling their own Sun. Because those alien exoplanets are in last stages of Swallowment. But a supercomputer should be given the task of figuring out where our gasgiants will meet and be Swallowed up to form a new star alongside our Sun. And to compute as to how many of the gasgiant satellites will survive the Swallowment. And to compute whether Pluto was indeed a moon of Neptune some long past years ago. Archimedes Plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "martin" wrote in message ... "Tom McDonald" wrote in message ... martin wrote: "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message om... It was mentioned today in the news that the Mars landing site had a Mesa in the background. I suppose the probe is not able to mobilize itself to this rock strata. It maybe ideal for looking for a coal seam on Mars. Are you a kook? News also mentioned that the surface was tacky and left imprints of the airbag and that there was black minerals in the imprints. Perhaps those black minerals are coal granules. You really believe that Mars had forests, vast vegetative cover, etc.? rest of stuff cut for sanity New here, Martin? yep I'd be waiting for Ed to post he had found human remains in the coal seams ROFL!!! Nice one! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
coal found on Mars; CellWell1 and CellWell2 origins of the Solar System | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 5 | January 8th 04 01:53 AM |
petrified-wood or coal found on Mars; CellWell1&2 or NebularDustCloud theories | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 04 08:24 PM |
amount of oil in the Mars crust math relationship of amount of oceans to amount of total oil | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 2 | January 5th 04 12:25 PM |