A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dark Energy won't cause the "Big Rip"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old December 17th 08, 07:20 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default Dark Energy won't cause the "Big Rip"

One of the theories about the nature of Dark Energy is that it keeps
growing and growing as the Universe expands. At some point the Dark
Energy is so strong that it can counteract the Strong Force and rip
matter apart, right at the subatomic level! This study seems to say that
Dark Energy will not grow, so there is no chance that matter will be
ripped apart at such a small scale.

No "Big Rip" in our Futu Chandra Provides Insights Into Dark Energy |
Universe Today
"But the Chandra study strengthens the evidence that dark energy is the
cosmological constant, and is not growing in strength with time, which
would cause the Universe to eventually rip itself apart."
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/12...o-dark-energy/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gravity: an alternative to "dark energy". Alan Mackenzie Astronomy Misc 21 September 26th 08 07:57 PM
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
$ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < brian a m stuckless Policy 0 November 23rd 05 11:34 AM
$ All sub-SYSTEMs have "surroundings", duh. Sub-SYSTEMs are "submerged" in SYSTEM "working fluid" AMBiENT. Sub-SYSTEMs ONLY EXCHANGE energy with "working fluid" AMBiENT. Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH: < brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 November 23rd 05 11:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.