![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting ABM concept; a large primary ABM "bus" heads toward a
incoming warhead(s) and decoys and dispenses small (around ten-pound) independent kill vehicles that then intercept all the warheads and decoys, eliminating the need to discriminate between the two: http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/mkv.htm Video of a test hover of it with 12 sub-interceptors attached he http://gizmodo.com/5104917/ Pat |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
Interesting ABM concept; a large primary ABM "bus" heads toward a incoming warhead(s) and decoys and dispenses small (around ten-pound) independent kill vehicles that then intercept all the warheads and decoys, eliminating the need to discriminate between the two: http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/mkv.htm So, the race becomes one between how many decoys can fit on the ICBM vs how many kill vehicles can fit on the ABM bus. Strange game... with my apologies to Joshua... I guess it isn't a MAD MAD MAD MAD world anymore? rick jones -- denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth... where do you want to be today? these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 11, 1:34 pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Interesting ABM concept; a large primary ABM "bus" heads toward a incoming warhead(s) and decoys and dispenses small (around ten-pound) independent kill vehicles that then intercept all the warheads and decoys, eliminating the need to discriminate between the two:http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/mkv.htm Video of a test hover of it with 12 sub-interceptors attached hehttp://gizmodo.com/5104917/ Pat And that's what's making our Pat and his company of brown-nosed minions and clowns into happy campers. I guess since we've got them, we should by all means use them. The sooner we get WWIII over with, the sooner the recovery process and that of our global domination can start. ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 11, 3:37 pm, Rick Jones wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote: Interesting ABM concept; a large primary ABM "bus" heads toward a incoming warhead(s) and decoys and dispenses small (around ten-pound) independent kill vehicles that then intercept all the warheads and decoys, eliminating the need to discriminate between the two: http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/mkv.htm So, the race becomes one between how many decoys can fit on the ICBM vs how many kill vehicles can fit on the ABM bus. Strange game... with my apologies to Joshua... I guess it isn't a MAD MAD MAD MAD world anymore? rick jones -- According to Pat Flannery, there's nothing to worry about. The world is obviously sick, and the only God approved surefire cure is a thermal nuclear exchange. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MDA contract for multiple kill vehicles | Allen Thomson | Policy | 0 | February 3rd 04 08:35 PM |