Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing

"ny2292000" wrote in message
...
On Oct 28, 6:57 am, "Androcles" wrote:
"ny2292000" wrote in message

...

Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession
and Gravitational Lensing

My theory is a 5D Spacetime theory

Hahahahaha!

Do you want to make some easy money, Androcles...
=========================================

No, I have enough, I don't need any more.
---------------------------------------------------


Find a fatal flaw
in my theory
=============================
"5D" does it, crank.
---------------------------------------------

On 28 Oct, 19:49, "Androcles" wrote:
"ny2292000" wrote in message

...
On Oct 28, 6:57 am, "Androcles" wrote:

"ny2292000" wrote in message

....

Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession
and Gravitational Lensing

My theory is a 5D Spacetime theory

Hahahahaha!

Do you want to make some easy money, Androcles...
=========================================

No, I have enough, I don't need any more.
---------------------------------------------------

*Find a fatal flaw
in my theory
=============================
"5D" does it, crank.
---------------------------------------------

Actually you can visualise a sperical surface as being curved, or you
can visualize it as being wrapped around a third dimension. The
predictions of GR (at least for weak fields) are thus completely
reproducable in 5 dimensional space. I have no argument with this. The
question I have relates to black holes

http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~aar/slides/orsay.pdf

When you have a black hole you have a different topology. I think the
reference I have given might be useful in that regard.


- Ian Parker

On Oct 29, 8:51*am, Ian Parker wrote:
On 28 Oct, 19:49, "Androcles" wrote:





"ny2292000" wrote in message

...
On Oct 28, 6:57 am, "Androcles" wrote:

"ny2292000" wrote in message

....

Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession
and Gravitational Lensing

My theory is a 5D Spacetime theory

Hahahahaha!

Do you want to make some easy money, Androcles...
=========================================

No, I have enough, I don't need any more.
---------------------------------------------------

*Find a fatal flaw
in my theory
=============================
"5D" does it, crank.
---------------------------------------------

Actually you can visualise a sperical surface as being curved, or you
can visualize it as being wrapped around a third dimension. The
predictions of GR (at least for weak fields) are thus completely
reproducable in 5 dimensional space. I have no argument with this. The
question I have relates to black holes

http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~aar/slides/orsay.pdf

When you have a black hole you have a different topology. I think the
reference I have given might be useful in that regard.

* - Ian Parker- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ian,

Thanks for the comments. I have to say that I left black holes for
last, in the sense that there are many results from my theory that
would be of extreme value to mankind and that should be the focus of
my attention first.

I mentioned that White Orifice as a "Black Hole" like result.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blog...lack-hole.html

Then I wrote this blog to emphasize the asymmetric nature of Force in
general and gravitational in particular.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blog...ed-galaxy.html


The Hypergeometrical Gravitational equations are identical in form to
the Hypergeometrical Electromagnetism equations and contain velocity
dependences.

It should be self-evident that it is different to accelerate than to
decelerate. Acceleration brings bodies towards lightspeed.
Deceleration does the opposite. We mindlessly always say that there
are no special reference frames, but that is not true. Any reference
frame close to the speed of light is special.

This means that a Black Hole with angular momentum would evolve into a
cylindrical topology and act as a propeler as in my White Orifice
Propeled Galaxy...

I have a Quantum view of Black Holes

Cheers,

MP