Lawsuit from a kook

Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punk wrote, that someone expose me .. what ?..

who did expose me ? you or the other punk called bob officer ?
bob officer alias the hacker ? see in google:

judoka_61

On 9 Nov 2003 13:23:43 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punk wrote, that someone expose me .. what ?..

who did expose me ? you or the other punk called bob officer ?
bob officer alias the hacker ? see in google:

judoka_61


You've exposed yourself, pervert.


Grow the **** up.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: eckles(at)midsouth.rr.com

"The services provided by Sylvia Browne Corporation are highly
speculative in nature and we do not guarantee that the results
of our work will be satisfactory to a client."
-Sylvia's Refund Policy

"No, the next step, Doktor, is that you start diagnosing illegally and
stupidly online, and get your license revoked."
-viveshwar

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:17:21 GMT, in sci.astro, DrPostman
wrote:

On 9 Nov 2003 13:23:43 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punk wrote, that someone expose me .. what ?..

who did expose me ? you or the other punk called bob officer ?
bob officer alias the hacker ? see in google:

judoka_61


You've exposed yourself, pervert.

Where did this comes from?

Me? A simple glass pusher, a hacker.

Simple point. Pietro used a computer to post to the net. The computer was
located in an internet cafe. The computer was infected with a virus. Pietro
for some reason had mine and several other people that posted in sci.astro
in an M$ address book.

The virus read that book and generated several 1000's of virus attacks. The
crime was even after pietro was told the system he was using was infected,
he *CONTINUED* to use them.




Grow the **** up.

Impossible.


--
Aktohdi

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

Grow the **** up.

--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"


...one day I will Dr.Punkman, 'til that day you can just ignore me.

judoka_61

On 11 Nov 2003 09:16:19 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.


Grow the **** up.


..one day I will Dr.Punkman, 'til that day you can just ignore me.

At least you recognize that you need to grow up. Till then I will
continue to remind folks about you.




--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: eckles(at)midsouth.rr.com

"In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know
that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,"
and then they would actually change their minds and you
never hear that old view from them again. They really do it.
It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists
are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens
every day. I cannot recall the last time someting like that
happened in politics or religion." "The method of science is
tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have.
And to abandon it, with its skeptical protocols, is the pathway
to a dark age."
- Carl Sagan

DrPostman wrote in message . ..

Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that
system.

They had their address on that system..realy ? a cop told me that
there are a lot of people in these days that have fun to forge e.mail
address they call 'em
...HACKERS"..

Grow the **** up.


...one day I will Dr.Punkman, 'til that day you can just ignore me.

At least you recognize that you need to grow up. Till then I will
continue to remind folks about you.
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed
Punk"


...there you go again...

judoka_61

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 11 Nov 2003 09:16:19 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.

Are you sure the virus infected mails were from him (you know, by
verifying the received from IP, host and so on from the mail header)?

Of course as I have never posted here before, I don't know the history
of this problem, but I have seen similar things happen other places,
where the person accused of having an infected machine where in fact
not responsible at all. Many modern mass mailing worms have a SMTP
functionality built in, and will scan the hard drive for mail
addresses (address books and browser caches for example), and chose
one to spoof as the sender. This means that the person that gets all
the complaints is in fact not infected(a virus doesn't send itself to
this person, as that would be suspicious) and so it will take more
time to track the source of the mails. Even if the person that started
the thread was the originator, it doesn't mean he has added you to his
address list, as the virus could just as well have found the addresses
in a browser cache or something like that...

I my self have received several mails from mail systems warning me
that the mail I sent was infected, when I never have sent any mails to
them, never have had a virus infection.. Either someone that have my
address in their list must have had the virus, or someone who has been
on a site where my mail vas listed got infected, and the virus digged
the address from this persons cache... Anyway, its quite frustrating
being marked as a virus spreader, when one knows one is innocent of
this.

This is not an attempt to absolve the thread starter of the blame if
he is the guilty one... I just thought I would mention this
possibility, just to make sure it was taken in to account, If you have
taken this in to account, I apologize for bothering you...

Grow the **** up.


..one day I will Dr.Punkman, 'til that day you can just ignore me.

At least you recognize that you need to grow up. Till then I will
continue to remind folks about you.




--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: eckles(at)midsouth.rr.com

"In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know
that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,"
and then they would actually change their minds and you
never hear that old view from them again. They really do it.
It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists
are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens
every day. I cannot recall the last time someting like that
happened in politics or religion." "The method of science is
tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have.
And to abandon it, with its skeptical protocols, is the pathway
to a dark age."
- Carl Sagan

On 15 Nov 2003 04:20:31 -0800, (TrAI) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 11 Nov 2003 09:16:19 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.

Are you sure the virus infected mails were from him (you know, by
verifying the received from IP, host and so on from the mail header)?

Of course as I have never posted here before, I don't know the history
of this problem, but I have seen similar things happen other places,
where the person accused of having an infected machine where in fact
not responsible at all. Many modern mass mailing worms have a SMTP
functionality built in, and will scan the hard drive for mail
addresses (address books and browser caches for example), and chose
one to spoof as the sender. This means that the person that gets all
the complaints is in fact not infected(a virus doesn't send itself to
this person, as that would be suspicious) and so it will take more
time to track the source of the mails. Even if the person that started
the thread was the originator, it doesn't mean he has added you to his
address list, as the virus could just as well have found the addresses
in a browser cache or something like that...

I my self have received several mails from mail systems warning me
that the mail I sent was infected, when I never have sent any mails to
them, never have had a virus infection.. Either someone that have my
address in their list must have had the virus, or someone who has been
on a site where my mail vas listed got infected, and the virus digged
the address from this persons cache... Anyway, its quite frustrating
being marked as a virus spreader, when one knows one is innocent of
this.

This is not an attempt to absolve the thread starter of the blame if
he is the guilty one... I just thought I would mention this
possibility, just to make sure it was taken in to account, If you have
taken this in to account, I apologize for bothering you...


Bob Officer would have to answer that question. He is the one who
was sent virus' from Pietro. I just like reminding our little kook
what a baby brat he was in going to the local police in Italy
and asking them to stop the mean ol' Bob from accusing him.








--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: eckles(at)midsouth.rr.com

"In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know
that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,"
and then they would actually change their minds and you
never hear that old view from them again. They really do it.
It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists
are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens
every day. I cannot recall the last time someting like that
happened in politics or religion." "The method of science is
tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have.
And to abandon it, with its skeptical protocols, is the pathway
to a dark age."
- Carl Sagan

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:55:39 GMT, DrPostman
wrote:

On 15 Nov 2003 04:20:31 -0800, (TrAI) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 11 Nov 2003 09:16:19 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.

Are you sure the virus infected mails were from him (you know, by
verifying the received from IP, host and so on from the mail header)?

Of course as I have never posted here before, I don't know the history
of this problem, but I have seen similar things happen other places,
where the person accused of having an infected machine where in fact
not responsible at all. Many modern mass mailing worms have a SMTP
functionality built in, and will scan the hard drive for mail
addresses (address books and browser caches for example), and chose
one to spoof as the sender. This means that the person that gets all
the complaints is in fact not infected(a virus doesn't send itself to
this person, as that would be suspicious) and so it will take more
time to track the source of the mails. Even if the person that started
the thread was the originator, it doesn't mean he has added you to his
address list, as the virus could just as well have found the addresses
in a browser cache or something like that...

I my self have received several mails from mail systems warning me
that the mail I sent was infected, when I never have sent any mails to
them, never have had a virus infection.. Either someone that have my
address in their list must have had the virus, or someone who has been
on a site where my mail vas listed got infected, and the virus digged
the address from this persons cache... Anyway, its quite frustrating
being marked as a virus spreader, when one knows one is innocent of
this.

This is not an attempt to absolve the thread starter of the blame if
he is the guilty one... I just thought I would mention this
possibility, just to make sure it was taken in to account, If you have
taken this in to account, I apologize for bothering you...


Bob Officer would have to answer that question. He is the one who
was sent virus' from Pietro. I just like reminding our little kook
what a baby brat he was in going to the local police in Italy
and asking them to stop the mean ol' Bob from accusing him.


I'd further like to know why pietro is interested in email addresses.
What does he do, collect them like stamps?

Probably tried to send me the same ****, but it probably bounced
because he's too stupid to unmunge my email addy, so that's why he
asked.

Very suspicious.



--

http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 15 Nov 2003 04:20:31 -0800, (TrAI) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 11 Nov 2003 09:16:19 -0800, (Pietro
Sommavilla) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,
pervert.

exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google:

And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
sent to their email. This was because you, for some reason you
have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.

Are you sure the virus infected mails were from him (you know, by
verifying the received from IP, host and so on from the mail header)?

Of course as I have never posted here before, I don't know the history
of this problem, but I have seen similar things happen other places,
where the person accused of having an infected machine where in fact
not responsible at all. Many modern mass mailing worms have a SMTP
functionality built in, and will scan the hard drive for mail
addresses (address books and browser caches for example), and chose
one to spoof as the sender. This means that the person that gets all
the complaints is in fact not infected(a virus doesn't send itself to
this person, as that would be suspicious) and so it will take more
time to track the source of the mails. Even if the person that started
the thread was the originator, it doesn't mean he has added you to his
address list, as the virus could just as well have found the addresses
in a browser cache or something like that...

I my self have received several mails from mail systems warning me
that the mail I sent was infected, when I never have sent any mails to
them, never have had a virus infection.. Either someone that have my
address in their list must have had the virus, or someone who has been
on a site where my mail vas listed got infected, and the virus digged
the address from this persons cache... Anyway, its quite frustrating
being marked as a virus spreader, when one knows one is innocent of
this.

This is not an attempt to absolve the thread starter of the blame if
he is the guilty one... I just thought I would mention this
possibility, just to make sure it was taken in to account, If you have
taken this in to account, I apologize for bothering you...


Bob Officer would have to answer that question. He is the one who
was sent virus' from Pietro. I just like reminding our little kook
what a baby brat he was in going to the local police in Italy
and asking them to stop the mean ol' Bob from accusing him.


Well, yes, I don't think the police anywhere would have the capacity
or willingness to investigate such things... There is so much flying
around on the net, that only serious stuff, like severe threats, virus
making, intentional virus/Trojan proliferation and such could hope to
raise any serious effort...

If I were accused of spreading viruses, I would rather check my
network for any suspicious stuff, and then if I found something, I
would apologize, if not, I would report that I didn't find anything,
and suggest that it might be spoofed mails from another reader of the
board/group(it does happen). Of course, my accusers might not accept
this, especially if they were my opposition in some discussion and
thought I wanted to take revenge or something, and that would require
some further action, but if all failed I would probably just leave the
board/group (It wouldn't be worth discussing in if such accusations
were to continue), not go to the police, it's not much they could do
anyway...




--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: eckles(at)midsouth.rr.com

"In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know
that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,"
and then they would actually change their minds and you
never hear that old view from them again. They really do it.
It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists
are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens
every day. I cannot recall the last time someting like that
happened in politics or religion." "The method of science is
tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have.
And to abandon it, with its skeptical protocols, is the pathway
to a dark age."
- Carl Sagan