A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

McCain lied about the "$3 million overhead projector"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 8th 08, 08:48 PM posted to alt.politics,sci.astro.amateur,alt.war.vietnam
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default McCain lied about the "$3 million overhead projector"

I am an Associate Professor of Astronomy at the University of Chicago
(the University that today has added yet another Nobel Prize winner in
the sciences for the US). I would like to comment on Sen. McCain's
statement during the today's debate that Sen. Obama has earmarked "$3
million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Ill. My
friends, do we need to spend that kind of money?"

The way Sen. McCain has phrased it suggests that Sen. Obama approved
spending $3 million on an old-fashioned piece of office equipment
(overhead projector).

The 3 million is actually for an upgrade of the SkyTheater - a full
dome projection system, which is probably the main attraction of the
Adler Planetarium and is quite sophisticated and impressive piece of
equipment.

I find it appalling that Sen. McCain would call a science education
tool for public (largely children) for a historic planetarium with
millions of visitors a year a wasteful earmark. The planetarium's
focus, as stated on their website (http://adlerplanetarium.org) is "on
inspiring young people, particularly women and minorities, to pursue
careers in science." Is an investment in such public facility at the
time when US competitiveness in math and sciences is a constant source
of alarm a waste?

"American's ability to compete in a 21st Century economy rests on our
continued investments in math and science education," said Rep. Brian
Baird, Chairman of the Research and Science Education Subcommittee in
Congress, after the passage of The 21st Century Competitiveness Act of
2007.

Considering such investments "wasteful earmarks" today, even in the
face of the financial crisis, will severely cripple US economic
competitiveness in the increasingly high-tech world down the road.

— Andrey Kravtsov, Chicago, IL

----------------------------------------------------

Anyone who would call a full-dome planetarium projection system an
"overhead projector" is totally ignorant of even basic science. Oh,
wait -- I forgot -- McCain's a Republicon -- they have no use for
science -- according to their one and only science text, the Earth was
created 6,000 years ago.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
might Odissey-Moon be the Google's expected, preferred, designed,"chosen" and (maybe) "funded" GLXP team to WIN the prize? with ALL otherteams that just play the "sparring partners" role? gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 27th 08 06:47 PM
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] Amateur Astronomy 1 April 29th 08 01:29 PM
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" fishfry Astronomy Misc 0 February 13th 08 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.