![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91109. TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov D.C. Agle (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. December 5, 2003 NEWS RELEASE: 2003-163 NASA Scientists Use Radar to Detect Asteroid Force NASA scientists have for the first time detected a tiny but theoretically important force acting on asteroids by measuring an extremely subtle change in a near-Earth asteroid's orbital path. This force, called the Yarkovsky Effect, is produced by the way an asteroid absorbs energy from the sun and re-radiates it into space as heat. The research will impact how scientists understand and track asteroids in the future. Asteroid 6489 "Golevka" is relatively inconspicuous by near-Earth asteroid standards. It is only one half-kilometer (.33 mile) across, although it weighs in at about 210 billion kilograms (460 billion pounds). But as unremarkable as Golevka is on a celestial scale it is also relatively well characterized, having been observed via radar in 1991, 1995, 1999 and this past May. An international team of astronomers, including researchers from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., have used this comprehensive data set to make a detailed analysis of the asteroid's orbital path. The team's report appears in the December 5 issue of "Science." "For the first time we have proven that asteroids can literally propel themselves through space, albeit very slowly," said Dr. Steven Chesley, a scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and leader of the study. The idea behind the Yarkovsky Effect is the simple notion that an asteroid's surface is heated by the sun during the day and then cools off during the night. Because of this the asteroid tends to emit more heat from its afternoon side, just as the evening twilight on Earth is warmer than the morning twilight. This unbalanced thermal radiation produces a tiny acceleration that has until now gone unmeasured. "The amount of force exerted by the Yarkovsky Effect, about an ounce in the case of Golevka, is incredibly small, especially considering the asteroid's overall mass," said Chesley. "But over the 12 years that Golevka has been observed, that small force has caused a shift of 15 kilometers (9.4 miles). Apply that same force over tens of millions of years and it can have a huge effect on an asteroid's orbit. Asteroids that orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter can actually become near-Earth asteroids." The Yarkovsky Effect has become an essential tool for understanding several aspects of asteroid dynamics. Theoreticians have used it to explain such phenomena as the rate of asteroid transport from the main belt to the inner solar system, the ages of meteorite samples, and the characteristics of so-called "asteroid families" that are formed when a larger asteroid is disrupted by collision. And yet, despite its profound theoretical significance, the force has never been detected, much less measured, for any asteroid until now. "Once a near-Earth asteroid is discovered, radar is the most powerful astronomical technique for measuring its physical characteristics and determining its exact orbit," said Dr. Steven Ostro, a JPL scientist and a contributor to the paper. "To give you an idea of just how powerful - our radar observation was like pinpointing to within a half inch the distance of a basketball in New York using a softball-sized radar dish in Los Angeles." To obtain their landmark findings, the scientists utilized an advanced model of the Yarkovsky Effect developed by Dr. David Vokrouhlický of Charles University, Prague. Vokrouhlický led a 2000 study that predicted the possibility of detecting the subtle force acting on Golevka during its 2003 approach to Earth. "We predicted that the acceleration should be detectable, but we were not at all certain how strong it would be," said Vokrouhlický. "With the radar data we have been able to answer that question." Using the measurement of the Yarkovsky acceleration the team has for the first time determined the mass and density of a small solitary asteroid using ground-based observations. This opens up a whole new avenue of study for near-Earth asteroids, and it is only a matter of time before many more asteroids are "weighed" in this manner. In addition to Chesley, Ostro and Vokrouhlický, authors of the report include Jon Giorgini, Dr. Alan Chamberlin and Dr. Lance Brenner of JPL; David Capek, Charles University, Prague, Dr. Michael Nolan, Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico, Dr. Jean-Luc Margot, University of California, Los Angeles, and Alice Hine, Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico. Arecibo Observatory is operated by Cornell University under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation and with support from NASA. NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, DC supported the radar observations. JPL is managed for NASA by the California Institute of Technology in Pasdena. More information about NASA's planetary missions, astronomical observations, and laboratory measurements are available on the Internet at: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ Information about NASA programs is available on the Internet at: www.nasa.gov -end- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Greenfield wrote: Could this be the same effect/phenomenon which is causing the anomalous accelleration of Cassini?? (or an ellaborate hoax) Are you thinking of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneers 10 and 11? There is no anomalous acceleration of Cassini, as far as I know. No, Yarkovsky effect is not the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneers. It's in the wrong direction. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Baalke wrote: "The amount of force exerted by the Yarkovsky Effect, about an ounce in the case of Golevka, is incredibly small, especially considering the asteroid's overall mass," said Chesley. "But over the 12 years that Golevka has been observed, that small force has caused a shift of 15 kilometers (9.4 miles). Apply that same force over tens of millions of years and it can have a huge effect on an asteroid's orbit. Asteroids that orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter can actually become near-Earth asteroids." Wouldn't extra thermal radiation on the afternoon side increase the asteroid's angular momentum? I can see the asteroid's orbit getting bigger, but can't imagine how Main Belt asteroid would drop down to an NEA. -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Hop David wrote: "...Asteroids that orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter can actually become near-Earth asteroids." Wouldn't extra thermal radiation on the afternoon side increase the asteroid's angular momentum? Depends on which way it is rotating; the afternoon side isn't necessarily the trailing side. I can see the asteroid's orbit getting bigger, but can't imagine how Main Belt asteroid would drop down to an NEA. Generally, it doesn't happen *directly* -- that is too big a change for such a relatively small effect. What happens is that the slow orbital drift due to Yarkovsky effect takes the asteroid into an orbit that's resonant with Jupiter. *That* can produce much more dramatic changes, on a scale that's very rapid compared to Yarkovsky effect. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hop David wrote in message ...
Ron Baalke wrote: "The amount of force exerted by the Yarkovsky Effect, about an ounce in the case of Golevka, is incredibly small, especially considering the asteroid's overall mass," said Chesley. "But over the 12 years that Golevka has been observed, that small force has caused a shift of 15 kilometers (9.4 miles). Apply that same force over tens of millions of years and it can have a huge effect on an asteroid's orbit. Asteroids that orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter can actually become near-Earth asteroids." Wouldn't extra thermal radiation on the afternoon side increase the asteroid's angular momentum? I can see the asteroid's orbit getting bigger, but can't imagine how Main Belt asteroid would drop down to an NEA. Excuse my dense!, but what is this "afternoon/morning" stuff? Do we know the rate of axial spin of these things? (relative to the sun) Jim G |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JG" == Jim Greenfield writes:
JG Hop David wrote in JG message ... Ron Baalke wrote: "The amount of force exerted by the Yarkovsky Effect, about an ounce in the case of Golevka, is incredibly small, especially considering the asteroid's overall mass," said Chesley. Wouldn't extra thermal radiation on the afternoon side increase the asteroid's angular momentum? I can see the asteroid's orbit getting bigger, but can't imagine how Main Belt asteroid would drop down to an NEA. JG Excuse my dense!, but what is this "afternoon/morning" stuff? Do JG we know the rate of axial spin of these things? (relative to the JG sun) In some cases we do. In general, though, one can always define a "morning" and "afternoon" side of any rotating body, unless its axis is pointed directly at the Sun (which isn't a stable configuration for very long, certainly not for an asteroid). The morning side is the one rotating toward the Sun, afternoon is the one rotating away. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Henry Spencer
writes In article , Jim Greenfield wrote: Could this be the same effect/phenomenon which is causing the anomalous accelleration of Cassini?? (or an ellaborate hoax) Are you thinking of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneers 10 and 11? There is no anomalous acceleration of Cassini, as far as I know. No, Yarkovsky effect is not the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneers. It's in the wrong direction. Anyway, wouldn't the Yarkovksy effect require that part of the spacecraft be rotating in and out of shadow? AFAIK that isn't happening - the Pioneers are rotating around an axis toward the sun. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jonathan Silverlight wrote: Anyway, wouldn't the Yarkovksy effect require that part of the spacecraft be rotating in and out of shadow? AFAIK that isn't happening - the Pioneers are rotating around an axis toward the sun. There could conceivably have been a *little* bit of it early on, because they were Earth-pointed, not Sun-pointed. I think everything major was in the shadow of the antenna at all times even so, but bits of the booms would have been going in and out of shadow. This has long since gotten pretty negligible, though. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon and Mars expeditions vs. RLV development | vthokie | Policy | 62 | March 30th 04 04:51 AM |
NASA Scientists Use Radar to Detect Asteroid Force | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 5th 03 11:41 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Invention For Revolution In Transport Industry | Abhi | Astronomy Misc | 16 | August 6th 03 02:42 AM |