![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a Christian astronomer it is wonderful to read the expansive
writings of Galileo whereas this era of limited intellects re-write history for their very limited ends.The great minds could move between disciplines with ease and discuss relationships without skipping a beat whereas the phony type of individual is inclined to twist historical characters and their insights towards whatever end is desired.Many use Galileo as an example of Church opposition to heliocentric reasoning with little understanding of the ins and outs of it themselves and I regret not meeting people who have actually risen to the level of basic heliocentric reasoning never mind the refinements or even how Galileo viewed his detractors - "In order to facilitate their designs, they seek so far as possible (at least among the common people) to make this opinion seem new and to belong to me alone. They pretend not to know that its author, or rather its restorer and confirmer, was Nicholas Copernicus; and that he was not only a Catholic, but a priest and a canon. He was in fact so esteemed by the church that when the Lateran Council under Leo X took up the correction of the church calendar, Copernicus was called to Rome from the most remote parts of Germany to undertake its reform. At that time the calendar was defective because the true measures of the year and the lunar month were not exactly known. The Bishop of Culm, then superintendent of this matter, assigned Copernicus to seek more light and greater certainty concerning the celestial motions by means of constant study and labor. With Herculean toil he set his admirable mind to this task, and he made such great progress in this science and brought our knowledge of the heavenly motions to such precision that he became celebrated as an astronomer. Since that time not only has the calendar been regulated by his teachings, but tables of all the motions of the planets have been calculated as well. Having reduced his system into six books, he published these at the insistence of the Cardinal of Capua and the Bishop of Culm. And since he had assumed his laborious enterprise by order of the supreme pontiff, he dedicated this book On the celestial revolutions to Pope Paul III. When printed, the book was accepted by the holy Church, and it has been read and studied by everyone without the faintest hint of any objection ever being conceived against its doctrines." http://www.galilean-library.org/manu...p?postid=43841 It is also the expansive views of those who Galileo chooses to quote that binds our kind together,even allowing for differences in temporal things such as Augustine - "Some of the brethren raise a question concerning the motion of heaven, whether it is fixed or moved. If it is moved, they say, how is it a firmament? If it stands still, how do these stars which are held fixed in it go round from east to west, the more northerly performing shorter circuits near the pole, so that the heaven (if there is another pole unknown to us) may seem to revolve upon some axis, or (if there is no other pole) may be thought to move as a discus? To these men I reply that it would require many subtle and profound reasonings to find out which of these things is actually so; but to undertake this and discuss it is consistent neither with my leisure nor with the duty of those whom I desire to instruct in essential matters more directly conducing to their salvation and to the benefit of the holy Church." St Augustine Here we are in the 21st century and men still have the motions of the Earth chained to the same celestial sphere geometry that Augustine noticed but did he not have the technical arguments or the time to contemplate it further, Archbishop Cusa did and left the way open for Copernicus to detail the motions of the Earth -an incredible achievement ! How our race went from geocentricity to heliocentricity and back to astrological sub-geocentricity is nothing short of a holocaust for there is no longer joy or love for the celestial arena,just a craving for grandstanding and self-congratulation.This is not a complaint,just honest indignation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IF EINSTEINIANS WERE HONEST | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 8 | July 10th 08 01:12 PM |
Honest but incorrect view | oriel36 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 6th 07 06:15 PM |
Be honest; What is your most-used telescope? | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 34 | August 8th 04 10:18 AM |
Looking for a honest opinion on TMB 152 | waterfront | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 1st 04 06:18 PM |
Newbie, Dork but Honest Question | BenignVanilla | Misc | 1 | January 28th 04 01:44 PM |