![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....For those wondering why I've been rather quiet the past week or so,
last Saturday morning I suffered a bit of a gastrophoresis attack - nausea, uncontrollable vomiting, bad sweats, *no* diarrhea - and wound up having to get EMS'd as I couldn't maintain stability enough to get into the wheelchair. They got it under control and released me Sunday night, but Monday morning it hit again almost as bad. This time I was able to get their with some control, and wound up getting faster service because they hadn't totally logged me out of the system yet! Anyway, by Wednesday morning they'd finally gotten a handle on the situation, if not the cause, and let me go that afternoon. I'm still not totally back on my foot, and have doubled my regolin dosage to keep the stomach in check, but so far I'm holding up. ....Now, here's the fun part: what totally threw them off was that when the ER doc looked at my past history, the first thing he figured was "ok, fat guy, type 2 diabetes, just pump him full of phenagrin and a shot of morphine and send him home...*after* you get the blood sugar down, just to teach the fat **** a lesson!" However, when the finger stick showed a sugar level of 121, the quack realized that something *else* was going on. The same thing happened the second time around, only the sugar was 135. What they suspect now is that my stomach end of the nervous system got knocked out of whack by four days of diet change and fasting to accommodate some blood chemistry tests my new primary care quack ordered up for me. All those were completed on Friday, and I'd had one fairly substantial but balanced meal the night before all hell broke loose. So what's the bottom line moral of all this? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, so just eat what the **** you want because no matter what it is, it's still gonna **** you over so you'd better just enjoy it while you can...:-P :-P OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OM" wrote in message
... So what's the bottom line moral of all this? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, so just eat what the **** you want because no matter what it is, it's still gonna **** you over so you'd better just enjoy it while you can...:-P :-P Yep.... I'd rather die fat, dumb and happy, than die skinny, dumb and hungry. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:12:37 -0700, OM
wrote: ...For those wondering why I've been rather quiet the past week or so, last Saturday morning I suffered a bit of a gastrophoresis attack - nausea, uncontrollable vomiting, bad sweats, *no* diarrhea - and wound up having to get EMS'd as I couldn't maintain stability enough to get into the wheelchair. They got it under control and released me Sunday night, but Monday morning it hit again almost as bad. This time I was able to get their with some control, and wound up getting faster service because they hadn't totally logged me out of the system yet! Anyway, by Wednesday morning they'd finally gotten a handle on the situation, if not the cause, and let me go that afternoon. I'm still not totally back on my foot, and have doubled my regolin dosage to keep the stomach in check, but so far I'm holding up. ...Now, here's the fun part: what totally threw them off was that when the ER doc looked at my past history, the first thing he figured was "ok, fat guy, type 2 diabetes, just pump him full of phenagrin and a shot of morphine and send him home...*after* you get the blood sugar down, just to teach the fat **** a lesson!" However, when the finger stick showed a sugar level of 121, the quack realized that something *else* was going on. The same thing happened the second time around, only the sugar was 135. What they suspect now is that my stomach end of the nervous system got knocked out of whack by four days of diet change and fasting to accommodate some blood chemistry tests my new primary care quack ordered up for me. All those were completed on Friday, and I'd had one fairly substantial but balanced meal the night before all hell broke loose. So what's the bottom line moral of all this? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, so just eat what the **** you want because no matter what it is, it's still gonna **** you over so you'd better just enjoy it while you can...:-P :-P OM What a ****ing waste of bandwidth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message ... What a ****ing waste of bandwidth I've never really understood this statement, I hear it all the time, but where's the shortage of bandwidth? If you're from some third world country that only has Internet for a few minutes a day or something, isn't that really your problem? At most, it's a click of the mouse to avoid any post and to complain about something as minor as that is really quite bizarre. Yet people do it all the time. So what's really going on? Maybe it was a waste of space because it wasn't entertaining enough for you? Or maybe you wanted some pictures to go with it? Was it too long? If the post had been the opposite, say, a post about having a great time out on vacation, would that have been worthy enough for you? Granted that most vacation stories are a bit lacking in excitement. Or are you just worried about the server and trying to help their bottom line? That's it, you're being a good Samaritan by keeping the bandwidth safe for us, the worthy posters. And keeping the server economically healthy to insure an uninterrupted flow of bandwidth. Even though this is going on and on, I'm not trying to waste your precious empty space, really, I want to know these answers. Why do you waste bandwidth, the bandwidth you seem to worship, with such a miserable response? Which post, the original or yours, displays a higher level of misery? And which kind of misery should be flamed, physical or spiritual? And keep your answers short please. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Read it; he's right (yes, I said that).
"jonathan" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message ... What a ****ing waste of bandwidth I've never really understood this statement, I hear it all the time, but where's the shortage of bandwidth? If you're from some third world country that only has Internet for a few minutes a day or something, isn't that really your problem? At most, it's a click of the mouse to avoid any post and to complain about something as minor as that is really quite bizarre. Yet people do it all the time. So what's really going on? Maybe it was a waste of space because it wasn't entertaining enough for you? Or maybe you wanted some pictures to go with it? Was it too long? If the post had been the opposite, say, a post about having a great time out on vacation, would that have been worthy enough for you? Granted that most vacation stories are a bit lacking in excitement. Or are you just worried about the server and trying to help their bottom line? That's it, you're being a good Samaritan by keeping the bandwidth safe for us, the worthy posters. And keeping the server economically healthy to insure an uninterrupted flow of bandwidth. Even though this is going on and on, I'm not trying to waste your precious empty space, really, I want to know these answers. Why do you waste bandwidth, the bandwidth you seem to worship, with such a miserable response? Which post, the original or yours, displays a higher level of misery? And which kind of misery should be flamed, physical or spiritual? And keep your answers short please. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 08:21:40 -0400, in a place far, far away,
"jonathan" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: "Joe" wrote in message .. . What a ****ing waste of bandwidth I've never really understood this statement, I hear it all the time, but where's the shortage of bandwidth? If you're from some third world country that only has Internet for a few minutes a day or something, isn't that really your problem? There's no shortage of oxygen, either, but some people are still a waste of it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:19:32 -0400, Joe
wrote: What a ****ing waste of bandwidth ....As opposed to quoting an entire post and then adding only one line of comment, and a lame one at that? Complaints-To: PLINK ....You weren't even worth a full PLONK, you ****ant little misanthrope. OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:44:00 GMT, h (Rand
Simberg) wrote: There's no shortage of oxygen, either, but some people are still a waste of it. ....And you managed to waste both on a *pair* of worthless sacks of **** at that. In one sentence, even! OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 10:14*am, OM wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:44:00 GMT, (Rand Simberg) wrote: There's no shortage of oxygen, either, but some people are still a waste of it. ...And you managed to waste both on a *pair* of worthless sacks of **** at that. In one sentence, even! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OM Good to see that you're back to your usual form, OM... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "OM" wrote in message ... ...For those wondering why I've been rather quiet the past week or so, Figured bbo hallre had kidnapped you and made you listen to his recital of Brad Guth's Greatest Misses. So what's the bottom line moral of all this? Damned if you do, damned if you don't, so just eat what the **** you want because no matter what it is, it's still gonna **** you over so you'd better just enjoy it while you can...:-P :-P That's what I'm sayin' !!!! Yes, eating the entire tube of Kickin' CHeddar Pringles in one sitting *is* a bad thing. Still, enjoy life. So, why haven't all those sweeties at the "gentlemen's clubs" been visiting Stumpy? ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quick question | Paul Schofield | SETI | 5 | November 30th 05 11:47 PM |
two quick questions | Jason Watters | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | November 30th 05 08:02 PM |
quick question | David Oatley | Misc | 1 | July 28th 04 07:33 PM |
[UPDATE] Some quick facts about Cassini's SOI burn | OM | History | 10 | July 4th 04 04:01 AM |
[UPDATE] Some quick facts about Cassini's SOI burn | OM | Policy | 4 | July 1st 04 02:44 PM |