Mollusk shaped solar system

There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the Earth has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral screwed and
circular at the same time.







--
Gravity Measurement
http://home.no.net/knutove/gravity/indexg.html

In message , Knut Ove Hauge
writes
There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the Earth has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral screwed and
circular at the same time.

Would you like to explain those figures? I get a distance of 9.4 E+11
meters in a year, or 4.25 e+21 meters since the Earth was formed. But
you specifically referred to 630 meters per year.
But the Hubble rate is actually 10^-11 per year (see the "expanding
solar system" thread) so your figure is wrong whatever numbers you use.
--
"It is written in mathematical language"
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

Jonathan Silverlight wrote:
In message , Knut Ove Hauge
writes

There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the Earth
has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral screwed and
circular at the same time.


Would you like to explain those figures? I get a distance of 9.4 E+11
meters in a year, or 4.25 e+21 meters since the Earth was formed. But
you specifically referred to 630 meters per year.
But the Hubble rate is actually 10^-11 per year (see the "expanding
solar system" thread) so your figure is wrong whatever numbers you use.

--
S=1/2*a*T^2
S=5.37e+22 = traveled distance since origin (from my home page)
a=8102 = gravity field acceleration (from my home page.)
All for the earth give the age of 3.66 billion years.Not second.
S=1/2*8102*1^2 = 4051 meters a year divided with 2pi gives 645 meters.

What figures did you use? It would be easier to point out where you are
wrong if you shows your figures.I assume you count with strait lines and
not with circular screwed spiral earth orbits which is what I use. If
you doubt about this type of orbit there is not really more to discuss.



Gravity Measurement

http://home.no.net/knutove/gravity/indexg.html

Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

In message , Knut Ove Hauge
writes

There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the Earth
has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral screwed and
circular at the same time.


Would you like to explain those figures? I get a distance of 9.4 E+11
meters in a year, or 4.25 e+21 meters since the Earth was formed. But
you specifically referred to 630 meters per year.
But the Hubble rate is actually 10^-11 per year (see the "expanding
solar system" thread) so your figure is wrong whatever numbers you use.

Look at my other posting where I forgot to explain where the
acceleration 8102 meters/s^2 came from.
It is derivable from the planets temperature and this simple
equation. T= sqrt(a gravity field * g planet) I.e. earth
T=sqrt(8102 * 9.81) = 284 deg. Kelvin.
a Mars = 5906, a Mercury = 13700, a Venus = 45000 and a the Moon = 3201
[m/s^2].
The S=5.37e+22 meters are derivable from the earth age of 3.66 billion
years, although it can be calculated on it's own. Look at my home page
section "Calculating the Age of the Planets".


--
Gravity Measurement

http://home.no.net/knutove/gravity/indexg.html

Knut Ove Hauge wrote:


Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

In message , Knut Ove Hauge
writes

There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the
Earth has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral screwed
and
circular at the same time.



Would you like to explain those figures? I get a distance of 9.4 E+11
meters in a year, or 4.25 e+21 meters since the Earth was formed. But
you specifically referred to 630 meters per year.
But the Hubble rate is actually 10^-11 per year (see the "expanding
solar system" thread) so your figure is wrong whatever numbers you use.


Look at my other posting where I forgot to explain where the
acceleration 8102 meters/s^2 came from.
It is derivable from the planets temperature and this simple
equation. T= sqrt(a gravity field * g planet) I.e. earth
T=sqrt(8102 * 9.81) = 284 deg. Kelvin.
a Mars = 5906, a Mercury = 13700, a Venus = 45000 and a the Moon = 3201
[m/s^2].
The S=5.37e+22 meters are derivable from the earth age of 3.66 billion
years, although it can be calculated on it's own. Look at my home page
section "Calculating the Age of the Planets".


Spelling error in equation:
T should be = sqrt(a "gravity field" * g "earth")
This figures are valid for some planets.
T Mercury = 370 deg.K a= 13993 [m/s^2]
T Venus = 660 deg.K a= 44980 [m/s^2]
T Mars = 240.7 deg.K a= 5906 [m/s^2]
T Moon = 177.7 deg.K a= 3219 [m/s^2]

--
Gravity Measurement

http://home.no.net/knutove/gravity/indexg.html

"Knut Ove Hauge" wrote in message
...

Look at my other posting where I forgot to explain where the
acceleration 8102 meters/s^2 came from.
It is derivable from the planets temperature and this simple
equation. T= sqrt(a gravity field * g planet) I.e. earth
T=sqrt(8102 * 9.81) = 284 deg. Kelvin.
a Mars = 5906, a Mercury = 13700, a Venus = 45000 and a the Moon = 3201
[m/s^2].
The S=5.37e+22 meters are derivable from the earth age of 3.66 billion
years, although it can be calculated on it's own. Look at my home page
section "Calculating the Age of the Planets".

Knut Ove Hauge: Still Looney After All These Years.

Knut Ove Hauge wrote:


Knut Ove Hauge wrote:



Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

In message , Knut Ove Hauge
writes

There could be some misunderstanding of my posting about the expanding
solar system at a rate of 630 meters a year. From the origin the
Earth has
travelled 5.37 E+22 meters through it's circle,spiral and its own spin
distance during a year of 1.47 E+10 meters. The orbit is rather complex
and could be compared to the way a mollusk shell grows.Spiral
screwed and
circular at the same time.




Would you like to explain those figures? I get a distance of 9.4 E+11
meters in a year, or 4.25 e+21 meters since the Earth was formed. But
you specifically referred to 630 meters per year.
But the Hubble rate is actually 10^-11 per year (see the "expanding
solar system" thread) so your figure is wrong whatever numbers you use.



Look at my other posting where I forgot to explain where the
acceleration 8102 meters/s^2 came from.
It is derivable from the planets temperature and this simple
equation. T= sqrt(a gravity field * g planet) I.e. earth
T=sqrt(8102 * 9.81) = 284 deg. Kelvin.
a Mars = 5906, a Mercury = 13700, a Venus = 45000 and a the Moon =
3201 [m/s^2].
The S=5.37e+22 meters are derivable from the earth age of 3.66 billion
years, although it can be calculated on it's own. Look at my home page
section "Calculating the Age of the Planets".


Spelling error in equation:
T should be = sqrt(a "gravity field" * g "earth")
This figures are valid for some planets.
T Mercury = 370 deg.K a= 13993 [m/s^2]
T Venus = 660 deg.K a= 44980 [m/s^2]
T Mars = 240.7 deg.K a= 5906 [m/s^2]
T Moon = 177.7 deg.K a= 3219 [m/s^2]

In case you should check the expansion rate for the other planets
Jonathan, I.e. Venus you must count 225 days a year and transform
the result to earth figures. Short you do like this.
S=1/2 * 45000 * (225/365)^2 /2 pi = 1361 meters.
Orbit growing rate Venus= 15 root(5 root(1361) ^7)^9 =430 meters.
9-15 and 5-7 is the number of standing gravity waves counted from the
sun to Earth and Venus.
You see that we get less meters for Venus than the Earth orbit expansion
rate due to Venus orbit is closer to the sun and the mollusk spiral
distance is less that close to the sun.
--
Gravity Measurement

http://home.no.net/knutove/gravity/indexg.html

On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:06:23 -0400, in sci.astro, "Greg Neill"
wrote:

"Knut Ove Hauge" wrote in message
...

Look at my other posting where I forgot to explain where the
acceleration 8102 meters/s^2 came from.
It is derivable from the planets temperature and this simple
equation. T= sqrt(a gravity field * g planet) I.e. earth
T=sqrt(8102 * 9.81) = 284 deg. Kelvin.
a Mars = 5906, a Mercury = 13700, a Venus = 45000 and a the Moon = 3201
[m/s^2].
The S=5.37e+22 meters are derivable from the earth age of 3.66 billion
years, although it can be calculated on it's own. Look at my home page
section "Calculating the Age of the Planets".

Knut Ove Hauge: Still Looney After All These Years.


The "K" is silent.


--
Aktohdi