![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
What did the Lowell, Lick and Yerkes refractors originally use for eyepieces? Have these changed much since these magnificent instruments were first put to good use? The incredibly long focal lengths of these instruments suggest that we aren't talking about typical amateur sized eyepieces or typical focal lengths. The atmosphere will only tolerate so much magnification despite the abundance of light. How did they get around this problem for planetary or lunar viewing? What order of useful magnification was possible then and now? Exit pupils, chromatic aberration and vignetting must surely have been a severe problem from the very start? I'd value hearing about any first hand viewing experiences with these wonderful instuments. Thanks Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:21:16 -0700 (PDT), "Chris.B"
wrote: I'd value hearing about any first hand viewing experiences with these wonderful instuments. They've had public viewings through the 40 inch at Yerkes and I've seen reports on the world wide web. The original eyepieces probably were ramsdens and huygenians. They would have used ramsden eyepieces with micrometers. The astronomy of position would have been the main focus of research at Lick and Yerkes when they were new institutions. Bud |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AP Refractors | Ed Majden | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | June 29th 06 07:40 AM |
Why Refractors are Better! | Jeff R. Schroeder | Amateur Astronomy | 47 | April 29th 05 04:45 PM |
Large Space Colonies and Large Disasters | Alex Terrell | Policy | 69 | January 21st 05 01:38 PM |
large refractors pricey!! | simon.coombs3 | UK Astronomy | 22 | August 1st 04 10:13 AM |
New to refractors | Fred | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | December 16th 03 10:50 PM |