![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The weather has been awful for the last 10 months. My todo list is
growing far faster than the weather has allowed me to reduce it. Ever since I built the observatory I've had one target I always figured was beyond its ability but I was bound and determined to try if conditions ever allowed. They never did. Until this new moon. After 10 clouded out new moons I had a clear one. Not only that it was the steadiest seeing I've ever had. And my goal was just crossing the meridian at the end of astronomical twilight. What could be more perfect. I gathered 2 hours of the most fantastic data I've ever captured. FWHM was down to 1.1" of arc! I was super excited. So excited I never noticed AutoSave was turned off!! It all went in the bit bucket. By now the target was lower in the sky and seeing had fallen to 1.5" but I did get two more 20 minute frames with autosave one. Over the next two nights I got a bit more Lum data, not what I lost however. What I was imaging was Abell 2218. It is quite famous. It has more mass packed into a small space than most galaxy clusters so was one of the first places astronomers looked for gravitational lensing. Sure enough, when the big scopes looked at the cluster at high resolution some were seen. My question was whether an amateur observatory like mine not located on a mountain with laminar air flow could image this. Considering the arcs were mostly 23rd magnitude and fainter plus were less than a second of arc wide it seemed a pipe dream. The first photo is the cluster at my normal 1" of arc per pixel. No arcs are seen. But with seeing so good I did the imaging at 0.5" per pixel. Then I blew that up to 0.25" per pixel. That's the second image. It is grainy due to the lack of exposure time but seeing at the needed level happens here only once in 3 years and I lost the 6 best frames! So we'll have to go with this. In a separate post I've put ID on some of the arcs. Some are 24th magnitude according to NED! The big blue galaxy is UGCA 413 at magnitude 14.68 and is only about 320 million light years away. Abell 2218 is 2.07 billion light years away light travel time. More on the lensed galaxies in the next post. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=6x20' binned 1x1, RGB=2x20' binned 2x2, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WOW!!! That is deep!
Joe "Rick Johnson" wrote in message om... The weather has been awful for the last 10 months. My todo list is growing far faster than the weather has allowed me to reduce it. Ever since I built the observatory I've had one target I always figured was beyond its ability but I was bound and determined to try if conditions ever allowed. They never did. Until this new moon. After 10 clouded out new moons I had a clear one. Not only that it was the steadiest seeing I've ever had. And my goal was just crossing the meridian at the end of astronomical twilight. What could be more perfect. I gathered 2 hours of the most fantastic data I've ever captured. FWHM was down to 1.1" of arc! I was super excited. So excited I never noticed AutoSave was turned off!! It all went in the bit bucket. By now the target was lower in the sky and seeing had fallen to 1.5" but I did get two more 20 minute frames with autosave one. Over the next two nights I got a bit more Lum data, not what I lost however. What I was imaging was Abell 2218. It is quite famous. It has more mass packed into a small space than most galaxy clusters so was one of the first places astronomers looked for gravitational lensing. Sure enough, when the big scopes looked at the cluster at high resolution some were seen. My question was whether an amateur observatory like mine not located on a mountain with laminar air flow could image this. Considering the arcs were mostly 23rd magnitude and fainter plus were less than a second of arc wide it seemed a pipe dream. The first photo is the cluster at my normal 1" of arc per pixel. No arcs are seen. But with seeing so good I did the imaging at 0.5" per pixel. Then I blew that up to 0.25" per pixel. That's the second image. It is grainy due to the lack of exposure time but seeing at the needed level happens here only once in 3 years and I lost the 6 best frames! So we'll have to go with this. In a separate post I've put ID on some of the arcs. Some are 24th magnitude according to NED! The big blue galaxy is UGCA 413 at magnitude 14.68 and is only about 320 million light years away. Abell 2218 is 2.07 billion light years away light travel time. More on the lensed galaxies in the next post. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=6x20' binned 1x1, RGB=2x20' binned 2x2, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice work Rick!
Rick Johnson wrote: What I was imaging was Abell 2218. It is quite famous. It has more mass packed into a small space than most galaxy clusters so was one of the first places astronomers looked for gravitational lensing. John N. Gretchen III N5JNG NCS304 http://www.tisd.net/~jng3 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comet SWAN: Oct. 23rd (U.T.) Observation | Willie R. Meghar | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | October 23rd 06 10:48 PM |
Comet over Los Angeles? 3:57AM March 23rd 2006 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 27th 06 06:51 AM |
The 23rd Qualm | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 7th 06 02:05 AM |
Magnitude Quote | Gareth Slee | UK Astronomy | 2 | September 12th 05 07:16 AM |
Magnitude Quote | Gareth Slee | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | September 10th 05 10:33 PM |