![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when
they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rudolph_X wrote in message ...
All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html Weren't you going to go away and never return? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Rudolph_X
wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? This one will require the Humvee-mounted woowoo gun. -=-=-=-=- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Carl R. Osterwald" :
In article , Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? This one will require the Humvee-mounted woowoo gun. Indeed, in the original report the claimed model of camera turns out to be binoculars, pretty hard to take photos with ![]() Later updates changed the model number to that of a digital camera. However the news reports claims that he gave NASA his camera's film! Later, still all his copies of the images were unavailable for downloading for outsiders to inspect. I wonder why ![]() Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred Garvin wrote: On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:21:19 -0400, Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! Douchebag says what? Shortly after the shuttle crashed, the Science Editor at the San Fransisco Chronicle ran a story that told of an amateur astromoner who had photographed what appeared to be a strange craggy "blue electrical bolt of energy" strinking the shuttle during its reentry into the atmosphere, while it was still over California. NASA got a hold of the digital camera and the memory chip that holds the digital photographs in its memory, and that is the last we (the public) ever heard about it. No mention was ever made of it during the investigation, and the photos were never released for viewing by the public. When I said, strange 'alien death ray', I didn't mean that some aliens shot the shuttle down. What I meant is that the strange 'blue electrical bolt' that was photographed striking the shuttle was 'alien' to our understanding. As yet, no good explanation has been given as to what it was, or why NASA is refusing to release the photos to the general public. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rudolph_X wrote: Fred Garvin wrote: On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:21:19 -0400, Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! Douchebag says what? Shortly after the shuttle crashed, the Science Editor at the San Fransisco Chronicle ran a story that told of an amateur astromoner who had photographed what appeared to be a strange craggy "blue electrical bolt of energy" strinking the shuttle during its reentry into the atmosphere, while it was still over California. NASA got a hold of the digital camera and the memory chip that holds the digital photographs in its memory, and that is the last we (the public) ever heard about it. No mention was ever made of it during the investigation, and the photos were never released for viewing by the public. When I said, strange 'alien death ray', I didn't mean that some aliens shot the shuttle down. What I meant is that the strange 'blue electrical bolt' that was photographed striking the shuttle was 'alien' to our understanding. As yet, no good explanation has been given as to what it was, or why NASA is refusing to release the photos to the general public. Here are a few old links on the subject for those of you who may have forgotten about it: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...2/MN221641.DTL http://www.rense.com/general34/wow.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St Petersburg? OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG, MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS TO PUTIN Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!! -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St Petersburg? OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG, MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS TO PUTIN Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!! -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter? Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental agency. Read the artice from Time magazine. http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his personal attacks.) If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency? Indeed, many other countries throughout the world also have similar official governmental agencies. However, the USA is still in the 'stone ages' when it comes to these kinds of forward looking scientific organizations. (Probably because its currently under the sway of the religious right, huh?) Here in the USA even though a majority of the population believes in UFOs, our government is still, apparently, blatantly maintaining the cover-up. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:56:23 GMT, Rudolph_X
wrote: Wally Anglesea^(TM) wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:21:19 GMT, Rudolph_X wrote: All along, I suspected that they did a 'white-wash', 'cover-up job' when they failed to mention the 'alien death ray' that struck the shuttle before it went down. Also, the photos of the 'blue electircal bolt' seen striking the shuttle just before it crashed, seem to have mysteriously disapeared. No one ever mentioned the photos, and the photos were never released for public viewing. What happened? A cover up? Congress, also, is not satisfied with panel's conclusions either. Something stinks in NASA! http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/spa....ap/index.html Hey Rudolph, Why can't anyone find this fictitious NSA in St Petersburg? OK, So far, I've been told that *THERE IS NO NSA IN ST PETERSBURG, MUCH LESS A DEPT OF UFO RESEARCH, AND CERTAINLY NOT ONE THAT REPORTS TO PUTIN Looks like your sources were stoooooopppid again!!! -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html Did you hear the one about the Chinese lumberjack's x-rated ET encounter? Yeah, and I'll pu it in the skeptical basket till it gets investigated. Right now, I'm trying to verify your sources that claimed some non-eixistent Russian claims something about a UFO. Start making up your excuses now. Seems that Chinese also have a similar 'official' UFO governmental agency. Read the artice from Time magazine. http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazi...8900%2C00.html Now try and tell us that the official UFO governmental agency in China doesn't exist. No, you won't do that. (Just, watch folks, this is where NO, I'll get round to that one if I get the time. Right now, we are discussing your Russian claims. Wally turns into a heckler, avoids the issue and starts with his personal attacks.) Well, as far as you are concerned, it save a whole lot of time, nitwit. NO, I'm calling YOU, and your reliance on NEXUS. I'm not discussing China, I want you explanation of using a non existent RUSSIAN organisation to bolster you claims, nitwit. If you can't debunk the Chinese official governmental UFO agency, why should we believe that you can debunk the officical Russian UFO agency? Are you *really* that stupid? I guess you must be. -- For the Truth about Planet X, Phil Plait's excellent summary: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
NASA Names New Safety Advisory Panel | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 18th 03 11:23 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |