![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION CANBERRA ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA TELEPHONE: +61 2 6125 5575 FACSIMILE: +61 2 6125 8255 URL: www.anu.edu.au/mac/media ANU MEDIA OFFICE CONTACT: Tim Winkler, (02) 6125 5001/0416 249 231 Thursday, 17 July 2003 STAR COUNT: ANU ASTRONOMER MAKES BEST YET There are more stars in the sky than all the grains of sand on every beach and in every desert on earth, according to an Australian National University astronomer who has made the most accurate calculation of star numbers to date. Dr Simon Driver, of the ANU Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, using some of the most powerful telescopes in the world, concluded that about 70 thousand million million million stars (7×10**22) shine down on us each night. "Even for a professional astronomer used to dealing in monster numbers this is mind-boggling," Dr Driver says. Most of these stars are too dim to see with the naked human eye, which can pick out only around 5,000 stars at the darkest parts of earth and just 100 in the middle of a big city, such as Sydney. Dr Driver and his collaborators -- Dr Jochen Liske, from the Royal Observatory Edinburgh; Dr Nicholas Cross, from Johns Hopkins University; Professor Warrick Couch, from the University of New South Wales and Dr David Lemon from St Andrews University -- did not count the stars one by one. Rather, Dr Driver and his team counted all the galaxies, which are large collections of stars, in one small region of the universe close to Earth. By measuring precisely how bright each galaxy is they were able to estimate how many stars it contained and extrapolated this out to the whole region of the Universe visible through telescopes. The researchers, who will present their finding to the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union today, believe their estimate is ten times more accurate than any previous count. "This is not the total number of stars in the universe, but it's the number within range of our telescopes. The real number could be much, much larger still -- some people think it is infinite." There have been other estimates of the number of stars over the years, but Dr Driver's calculation is the closest so far because it combines the best counts of galaxies ever conducted with the most modern cosmological measurements of the geometry of our universe. The observations were carried out using many of the world's most powerful telescopes, including the Anglo-Australian Telescope, located at the University's Siding Spring Observatory, near the town of Coonabarabran. The calculations would not have been possible without the world's largest galaxy survey, the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, which will be released at this meeting. "Most of these stars probably have planets, a fraction of which probably have life," Dr Driver says. "But they are very, very far away. It's not so much a question of whether other life exists, but whether we will ever be able to contact them given the massive distances involved." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Yee wrote:
There are more stars in the sky than all the grains of sand on every beach and in every desert on earth, according to an Australian National University astronomer who has made the most accurate calculation of star numbers to date. I'll delurk long enough to point out that I posted an order of magnitude estimate of the stars/sand ratio to sci.astro.amateur several years ago, and it's pretty close to 1.0. See http://www.google.com/groups?selm=37...E65%40home.com http://www.google.com/groups?selm=3A...97A%40home.com "Even for a professional astronomer used to dealing in monster numbers this is mind-boggling," Dr Driver says. People enjoy being boggled, I guess. Hopefully it doesn't diminish the grandeur of the universe to realize that we can find numbers of this size in things, like sand grains, that are closer to human scale. - Ernie http://mywebpages.comcast.net/erniew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ernie Wright
writes Andrew Yee wrote: There are more stars in the sky than all the grains of sand on every beach and in every desert on earth, according to an Australian National University astronomer who has made the most accurate calculation of star numbers to date. I'll delurk long enough to point out that I posted an order of magnitude estimate of the stars/sand ratio to sci.astro.amateur several years ago, and it's pretty close to 1.0. See http://www.google.com/groups?selm=37...E65%40home.com http://www.google.com/groups?selm=3A...97A%40home.com "Even for a professional astronomer used to dealing in monster numbers this is mind-boggling," Dr Driver says. People enjoy being boggled, I guess. Hopefully it doesn't diminish the grandeur of the universe to realize that we can find numbers of this size in things, like sand grains, that are closer to human scale. A chemist probably wouldn't be impressed :-) It's roughly the number of atoms in 1 gram of carbon, if I've done my sums right. -- "Roads in space for rockets to travel....four-dimensional roads, curving with relativity" Mail to jsilverlight AT merseia.fsnet.co.uk is welcome. Or visit Jonathan's Space Site http://www.merseia.fsnet.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |