![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems they hit it at about 10:30 PM EST.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert casey wrote:
Seems they hit it at about 10:30 PM EST. So, when and where do we expect the meteor shower? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert casey wrote:
Seems they hit it at about 10:30 PM EST. Good shootin' boys and girls. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where's the fun in shooting something if it becomes more dangerous
after you've hit it than it was before? "No, no, don't do that. If you shoot it you'll just make him mad." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 2:47*am, Neil Gerace wrote:
Where's the fun in shooting something if it becomes more dangerous after you've hit it than it was before? "No, no, don't do that. If you shoot it you'll just make him mad." Send it a candygram! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 8:56 pm, kT wrote:
robert casey wrote: Seems they hit it at about 10:30 PM EST. So, when and where do we expect the meteor shower? A good shower of hot and nasty stuff for at least the next month or so, sounds about right. Just silly pondering, as to what's the all-inclusive combined $$$ investment here? We talking of the initial satellite R&D, of it's launch and multiple efforts trying to fix a seriously dead DoD/MI5/CIA horse, then the spendy kill and now the ongoing tracking and bit by bit clean up that could go on for years, and that's if nothing else encounters said debris in the mean time. That all-inclusive tally has got to be spendy. Otherwise, that's also an impressive accomplishment, a direct hit at roughly 10 km/s in 3D space is proof positive that if we know exactly where the target is at any given moment, and having all the very best of terrestrial and space applied tracking and navigation in addition to whatever AI the missile itself had to work with, that we can in fact take out any number of satellites or incoming ICBM's that are not using stealth or tactical avoidance measures. Of course, now we've got another month of orbital decay debris to contend with, and likely some of that satellite debris that's unavoidably headed a bit higher and going off in multiple directions at the same time that is either unknown or nondisclosure rated as to how many years before such artificial and potentially lethal flak returns to Earth. .. - Brad Guth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "No, no, don't do that. If you shoot it you'll just make him mad." Send it a candygram! "Mumm, recon satellite like candygram..." KaBoom!!! :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 9:18 pm, "Matt Wiser" wrote:
robert casey wrote: Seems they hit it at about 10:30 PM EST. Good shootin' boys and girls. Unless talking about utilizing a directional impact or controlled blast from the top down, orbital debris has in fact gone far and wide to either side of the original path, as well as some parts going further up into extended LEO. I believe it has something to do with the laws of physics. Of any spy satellite worth half its nearly billion dollar investment would have had at least three of everything that was mission critical at its disposal (plus having a auto-destruct feature). How can all three of those spendy failsafe systems have gone so entirely into the toilet, especially right off the bat? A good shower of hot and nasty stuff for at least the next month or so, sounds about right, perhaps covering a +/- 100 km deorbit path of incoming flak that all future air and space travels should avoid for at least the next month, and of LEO usage having to avoid a similar gauntlet (including at least an extra 100 km of debris height) for at minimum another good year or more. Now that's an impressive accomplishment, a direct hit at roughly 10 km/ s in 3D space is proof positive we've got the right stuff, that is if we've known exactly where the target is at any given moment, and having all the very best of terrestrial and space applied tracking and navigation in addition to whatever AI the missile itself had to work with, that we can in fact take out a number of satellites or incoming ICBM's that are not of any surprise and using stealth or tactical avoidance measures. Of course, now we've created another month of somewhat iffy orbital decay debris to contend with, and likely some of that satellite debris that's unavoidably headed a bit higher as well as going off in multiple LEO directions at the same time, that's for the moment either unknown or nondisclosure rated as to how many years before such artificial and potentially lethal flak returns to Earth, and them smaller bits of satellite that moved upwards and having good density are simply not going to create all that much aerobraking for some time to come. .. - Brad Guth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() smaller bits of satellite that moved upwards and having good density are simply not going to create all that much aerobraking for some time to come. . - Brad Guth Apogee will be higher, but the perigee will still be in the extreme upper atmosphere, and will eventually get dragged down and reenter. Be a while though. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 11:10 am, robert casey wrote:
smaller bits of satellite that moved upwards and having good density are simply not going to create all that much aerobraking for some time to come. . - Brad Guth Apogee will be higher, but the perigee will still be in the extreme upper atmosphere, and will eventually get dragged down and reenter. Be a while though. Can the upper most or worse case Apogee reach into the path of ISS? .. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shootin down that recon satellite | Todd H. | Space Shuttle | 40 | March 1st 08 12:37 PM |
Saving that Recon. Satelite | Mark Kelep | Space Shuttle | 16 | February 21st 08 09:01 AM |
A white cute girl getting nailed hidden cam | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 7th 06 06:37 AM |
Mars Recon Orbiter Orbit Insertion | Jack | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 10th 06 10:35 AM |