China and Japan not taking another NASA no for an answer

Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Once again, all of those Usenet lights have gone out, as though
there's something of truth to behold about our physically dark,
somewhat salty, essentially naked and therefore entirely reactive/
anticathode worthy moon that our Borg like NASA/Apollo collective of
mostly semitic infowar/infomercial spewing rusemasters don't want to
draw any attention to.

Perhaps it's just myself thinking that we've all been snookered to
death and then summarily raped by those of us having "the right
stuff", and then some, though I suppose I could be wrong if such off-
world physics and of whatever derived science is actually different
than terrestrial physics and science.
--
Brad Guth


BradGuth wrote:
Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

On Nov 16, 8:49 am, BradGuth wrote:
Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth


They are already down to 10 meters per pixel in raw image format, and
it's only going to get better as other science is obtained, especially
when applied into a composite image that'll allow us to see far more
depth, spectrum and detail than any naked human eye. Unless our
Boeing/Raytheon/TRW ABL cannon can manage to blind or simply roast
Selene's instruments, it's just a matter of time, isn't it.

China and Japan are clearly not about to be taking another NASA no for
an answer, and that's why this kind of fresh and honestly revealing
look-see with further science and planetology measurements other than
pictures are being accomplished by other than our crack NASA wizards
that have to concentrate their best talents upon keeping those semitic
butt-cracks as tight and straight as possible.

Quite oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon exploration mission, that's closing in on what Japan
already has as an ongoing 3-satellite observation and science
gathering process, that'll each pick up the slack where the previous
US and Russian missions of mostly hocus pocus disinformation and/or
evidence exclusion left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of damage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial, is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy is why we even have this
following insignificant contribution by our very own "kT". But we
should take a little further notice as to how all the usenet lights
tend to go out whenever there's another not so insignificant speck of
truth about our moon to behold, especially when such doesn't in any
way support as to what those as "having the right stuff" were tilling
us to believe.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0
"Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!"

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's the first of their 20 and 10 meter resolution images, with
better than 10 meter resolution coming up next, and try to remember
that's prior to using any PhotoShop enlargement and subsequent
"unsharp" filter processing.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...i03bands_l.jpg
"Figure 2: Comparison between the KAGUYA TC image and the Clementine
image
You can see the comparison between the image taken by the KAGUYA TC
cut out from the TC's first image data (the area encircled by the
yellow dot square in Figure 1) and the image shot by the high aerial
resolution camera onboard the Clementine Satellite. In the TC camera
image, you can see that the smaller craters (10-90 meters in size) and
the minute structure of the inside of a crater."
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...uya_tc02_l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original HDTV images that offered
the expected off-color saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky
secondary or recoil worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our
naked and thus unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
elements as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth
(adjusting gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise
by simply replacing their image black with most any other color),
though it's still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice
as to how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal
like 0.11 albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty
deep soft lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very
poorly reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm being quite honestly serious about this next part;
do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise
physically modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on
behalf of those hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly loaded question,
as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those composite full color
spectrum images of the moon, as properly adjusted for their more
natural to the human eye's limited hue detection worth of color
saturations, plus those other nifty instruments start reporting their
science data, as well as from whatever China can uncover and share is
just around the very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Good old and trusty Guth hits yet another NASA/Apollo private part
with another one of his lose but honest cannons.

NASA's brown-nosed semitic clowns have less than a year to cover their
butts. Then what?

China moon

Japan moon
--
Brad Guth

Outside of Russia and our NASA, Japan has become the first and China a
close second "back to the moon", and thus far packing better
technology than anything within our NASA or DoD inventory. Perhaps we
americans are being treated much like Jesus Christ on a stick, in as
much as go figure as to how we're being so screwed by our own kind.

In addition to JAXA's Selene/KAGUYA mission doing exactly as planned
(pulling in those nifty 10 meter/pixel images and lots more to come),
it seems there's good old China that's acting extremely wise and fully
in charge of accomplishing their task of mapping and thus further
exploring the potential of our moon, with future intentions of their
robotically mining for those raw elements, including He3. Perhaps if
our moon is in any way hollow or with geode pockets of good enough
volume for accommodating a few brave humans, whereas China and quite
possibly their partnerships with Japan and India will seriously pay
off, while we're stuck with suppressing a few too many ****ed off
Muslims, as well as our having to pay through the nose for the likes
of terrestrial fossil, synfuels and even yellowcake.

Chang'e 1 sends back moon picture
http://www.china.org.cn/english/China/232774.htm

China's first lunar probe Chang'e 1 sent back its first moon picture
on Tuesday as scheduled, the National Space Administration has said.

Experts will later adjust cameras on the satellite according to the
moon picture's quality to ensure following photos are clear and
accurate, the Shaanxi-based West China City Daily reported today.

The first moon photo will be made public next week, the report cited
the administration as saying.

Tests on the orbiter's equipment showed that it is working normally
and in good condition, the administration said.

The probe had orbited the moon 168 times by 2 pm yesterday, the
administration said.

More tests will be conducted in the next few days that will help
ensure data transmissions continue. The satellite has gone through a
number of tests since it entered the moon's orbit on November 7.
Chang'e 1's position was adjusted on Monday so its probing equipment
faced the moon.

The satellite, named after a mythical Chinese goddess who flew to the
moon, is supposed to stay 200 km above the moon's surface to carry out
scientific explorations for one year.

Cameras on the 2,350-kilogram satellite are expected to photograph
every inch of the moon's surface by mid January.

The orbiter is expected to analyze the chemical and mineral
composition of the lunar surface and send data back to the Earth so
that scientists can better understand the moon's environment, Li
Guoping, the administration's spokesman, said in earlier reports.

Chang'e 1 blasted off on a Long March 3A carrier rocket on October 24
from the Xichang Satellite Launch Center in Sichuan Province, marking
the first step of China's ambitious 10-year moon plan, which will lead
to a moon landing and launch of a moon rover around 2012.

In the third phase, scheduled for 2017, another rover will land on the
moon and return to earth with lunar soil and stone samples for
scientific research.

In 2003, China became only the third country in the world after the
United States and Russia to send a human into orbit.

(Shanghai Daily November 22, 2007)
-

Perhaps China will have little if any perpetrated cold-war need of
such faith-based cloak and dagger distorting or excluding of the
truth, or otherwise holding back their new and improved science data
about our naked, physically dark, somewhat salty and unavoidably
reactive/anticathode moon that has such an electrostatic dusty surface
of unusual mascon considerations, as well as being continually
saturated in cosmic gamma and X-rays (especially by day when it's also
double IR roasting everything in sight), within such a nearly zero
atmospheric density means having insignificant if any attenuation from
all of that surrounding gauntlet of primary and secondary/recoil
radiation, not to mention the lack of moderating the velocity of
incoming physical debris that's arriving from all directions, that's
only speeding up prior to whatever near-miss or likely impact.

Too bad that our NASA team of supposed wizards without their original
semitic Third Reich team can't even manage to establish a station-
keeping platform of science instruments, as interactively halo orbited
within the moon's L1 (robotic Clarke Station), however it is most
likely that Japan, China or India should not have such difficulties.
Of course, the most educated of Americans don't even know of what or
where the moon's L1 is, much less having any clue as to it's
technological value as a space depot/gateway in addition to the
absolutely terrific science improvements on behalf of Earth and moon
planetology, and that's not to mention those improved detections,
trackings and best possible management of NEOs as potential Earth
killers.
--
Brad Guth


On Nov 17, 8:55 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 16, 8:49 am, BradGuth wrote:

Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...http://www.jax...

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200...ttp://www.jaxa...

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

They are already down to 10 meters per pixel in raw image format, and
it's only going to get better as other science is obtained, especially
when applied into a composite image that'll allow us to see far more
depth, spectrum and detail than any naked human eye. Unless our
Boeing/Raytheon/TRW ABL cannon can manage to blind or simply roast
Selene's instruments, it's just a matter of time, isn't it.

China and Japan are clearly not about to be taking another NASA no for
an answer, and that's why this kind of fresh and honestly revealing
look-see with further science and planetology measurements other than
pictures are being accomplished by other than our crack NASA wizards
that have to concentrate their best talents upon keeping those semitic
butt-cracks as tight and straight as possible.

Quite oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon exploration mission, that's closing in on what Japan
already has as an ongoing 3-satellite observation and science
gathering process, that'll each pick up the slack where the previous
US and Russian missions of mostly hocus pocus disinformation and/or
evidence exclusion left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of damage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial, is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy is why we even have this
following insignificant contribution by our very own "kT". But we
should take a little further notice as to how all the usenet lights
tend to go out whenever there's another not so insignificant speck of
truth about our moon to behold, especially when such doesn't in any
way support as to what those as "having the right stuff" were tilling
us to believe.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...
"Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!"

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's the first of their 20 and 10 meter resolution images, with
better than 10 meter resolution coming up next, and try to remember
that's prior to using any PhotoShop enlargement and subsequent
"unsharp" filter processing.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...i03bands_l.jpg
"Figure 2: Comparison between the KAGUYA TC image and the Clementine
image
You can see the comparison between the image taken by the KAGUYA TC
cut out from the TC's first image data (the area encircled by the
yellow dot square in Figure 1) and the image shot by the high aerial
resolution camera onboard the Clementine Satellite. In the TC camera
image, you can see that the smaller craters (10-90 meters in size) and
the minute structure of the inside of a crater."http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img/20071116_kaguya_tc02_l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original HDTV images that offered
the expected off-color saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky
secondary or recoil worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our
naked and thus unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
elements as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth
(adjusting gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise
by simply replacing their image black with most any other color),
though it's still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice
as to how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal
like 0.11 albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty
deep soft lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very
poorly reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm being quite honestly serious about this next part;
do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise
physically modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on
behalf of those hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly loaded question,
as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those composite full color
spectrum images of the moon, as properly adjusted for their more
natural to the human eye's limited hue detection worth of color
saturations, plus those other nifty instruments start reporting their
science data, as well as from whatever China can uncover and share is
just around the very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Just because the frail DNA of mere humans haven't walked on the moon
is no good reason as to why those future rad-hard and physically
robust robotics of Japan and China can't manage.

Perhaps this contribution as a sub-topic is best if it were being
shared within a few other Usenet groups: rec.photo.digital,
uk.rec.photo.misc, alt.journalism.newspapers, alt.revisionism,
sci.geo.satellite-nav, sci.geo.geology, talk.atheism

In addition of our recently getting access to those new and greatly
improved images of our moon that's will worth further enlarging, plus
future loads of other new and improved science that'll begin telling
us what that naked and somewhat salty moon surface has to offer,
there's still good old and at times extremely nearby Venus that's
looking as though having been lived upon (not that discovering we have
a hollow moon wouldn't be rather nifty).

Thanks again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for having posted
another public link to this somewhat updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of AI pixel worthy information can be
found within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of
'GUTH Venus', of which you folks should apply your own PhotoShop
resampling/enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care
to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such enlargements without making
whatever image look worse off than it really is. (go figure)
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this rational community worth of extremely
interesting pixels, then you are not nearly as good at
observationology as you think you are. Usually this only happens with
the sorts of pretend atheists that are forever stuck or sequestered
within their own faith-based naysay mode, regardless of whatever
physics or the best available science has to offer.

Digital photo resampling or enlarging with various pixel interpolation
algorithms are not new nor unused by our NIMA and multiple other spy
and commercial photo agencies. The sorts of freeware or trialware
such as PhotoCleaner, PhotoZoom and CleanerZoomer are just examples
that'll perform as well or better than ADOBE PhotoShop, are each
sufficiently user friendly and as always allows for user options in
order to suit the kinds of results that'll yield the best possible
enlargement without introducing weird distortions or artifacts out of
thin air(sort of speak).

http://www.photocleaner.com
PhotoCleaner w/multiple resize algorithms and automatic unsharp

http://www.benvista.com/main/content...otozoompro_ 1
http://www.benvista.com/main/content...page=downloads
PhotoZoom Pro w/S-Spline XL interpolation algorithm enlarging

CleanerZoomer
http://www.stratopoint.com/czoomer.htm
Of course the digital radar image of 36 looks per pixel is somewhat
better to begin with, as nearly 3D worthy and each raw pixel being
about as real or as truth worthy of pixel as we're going to get, which
sort of makes up for the 225 meter per pixel resolution that's being
enlarged for a better look-see at whatever's most likely associated
with those raw pixels.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedeta...-restoration1/
"Red Fox, image from Figure 3 after photoshop unsharp mask, radius =
4.0, 75%, threshold = 3, then another unsharp mask with radius = 2.0,
66%, threshold = 3. This is a about the best I can do with the unsharp
mask tool"

As you can see for yourself, between ADOBE PhotoShop and Adaptive
Richardson-Lucy Iteration there's nothing getting artificially
generated via enlarge/resampling and unsharp applications that created
weird pixels out of nowhere. As long as the raw pixel patterns were
there to behold in the first place, there's nothing that gets software
AI or otherwise created weird in the enlarged images that's
indifferent to whatever those original pixels represent. Of course
with the likes of PhotoShop is where any damn village idiot fool can
just as easily force the original image into distorting everything in
sight, which only proves that such a result can be accomplished if
that's the intended objective.

However, most folks within Usenet's anti-think-tank of naysayland
should as IggyZiggy says, have that word "obfuscate" tattooed to their
forehead, as they quite often intend to live, breathe, eat, and
worship that mostly semitic God of obfuscation by using word games,
something their Third Reich and the likes of our very own resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) and of his puppeteer Dick Cheney are really
good at obfuscating the hell out of most everything.

So, when I've asked of others to share and share alike, as to
providing their own best effort examples of the image pertaining to
Venus that I'd pointed out as of nearly 8 years ago, lo and behold the
brown-nosed obfuscation clowns of Usenet's naysayland kicked into full
topic/author stalking, bashing and banishment action, whit all of
their usual gauntlet of evidence exclusion so as to not rock their
mainstream good ship LOLLIPOP status quo that's clearly more semitic
faith based than not.

We need to take a very close look at Venus, as for giving this
extremely nearby planet proper consideration on behalf of other
intelligent life that once upon a time having been and by rights may
even still be existing/coexisting within that geothermally forced
environment, of their having survived within such a newish worth of
active planetology that not exactly user friendly to the likes of us
naked humans. I'm certainly not speaking of the dumbfounded sorts of
naked humans without a clue other than their terrestrial limited faith-
based analogy towards everything, but rather of either locally evolved
and/or new and improved species as having been imported intelligent
life, that's simply utilizing applied physics and obviously good
technology that's taking the fullest advantage of their applied
physics and local cache of such vast amounts of renewable energy.

There's no argument that Venus in most surface locations is nearly hot
as hell, however, if you can constructively contribute a little
something of image processing, or otherwise on behalf of explaining
the sorts of physics and applied technology that'll function within
such a thermal dynamic worth of planetology, that'll actually survive
within the regular laws of physics (such as the process of the local
makings and sustaining ice), is exactly what I'd appreciate and give
the fullest of credit for whatever talent or expertise you'd care to
share.
--
Brad Guth


On Nov 16, 8:49 am, BradGuth wrote:
Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Apparently NASA's cloak of uplink.space.com is still into banishing
the truth w/o remorse and regardless of the consequences. At least
that way our NASA gets to say NO to the whole truth and nothing but
the truth all the time it likes, just like Hitler and our resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

In response to:
Poster: SPACEINVADOR
Subject: Japan's Lunar Probe
http://uplink.space.com/showthreaded...apsed&sb=5&o=0

"There just isn't much reward when it comes to pictures from space,
IMO. We can take great photographs from earth of space/stars, but we
can't get those same quality or even better pictures from space?...
I'm not talking about pictures from telescopes."

"Ok, in the Lunar Probe pictures we can see the earth just as if it
were being viewed at night, even though it is day on that spot of the
moon. Are cameras like the human eyes? Does the pupil not dilate due
to the brightness reflected off the surface of the moon? I think not.
If I was on the moon where the Lunar Probe is and I was looking up
into the "blackness" of space and my eyes weren't affected from the
reflected light of the moon's surface, shouldn't I be able to see
something up there in space? Come on."
-


There are CCDs of 100+ fold better DR than film.

16 db of 131,057:1 or even 20db of 1,048,576:1 are technically doable
within scientific configured cameras, or at the very least sliding
their 12 bit 4,096:1 scope of DR towards utilizing either extreme of
the 20+db CCD potential has been doable for quite some time. Instead
we the public usually get to see all of 4, 5 or possibly as good as 6
db worth, so as to easily exclude all but the brightest of items
that'll fall within that intentionally limited DR, and their version
of robo PhotoShop is what easily takes care of whatever else needs to
get excluded.

Basically, it's a faith-based kind of loaded card game they're
playing, and the stack of cards is always loaded in favor of the
house.

However, I honestly do not expect JAXA or especially of China to play
along with NASA's tired old game plan of intentionally excluding such
other worthy items from future images of our physically dark as coal
moon.
-- Brad Guth

-
Well lo and behold, it didn't take long for those pesky brown-nosed
rusemaster clowns of NASA's uplink.space.com borg like minion
collective, and of their semitic Third Reich to switch right back into
full butt-covering damage control action. (it's what such semites as
pretend atheists do best)

I expect they'll be excluding or otherwise banishing everything I've
had to say, just as they did before. Apparently sharing the whole
truth and nothing but the truth is simply against uplink.space.com
policy.

-
uplink.space.com goes directly into its usual book burning failsafe
mode:
"We cannot proceed."
"We encountered a problem. The reason reported was:"

"You have been banned from making any new posts or sending private
messages. The reason for this ban is: Returned banned member bradguth"

Gee Whiz folks, what another unexpected surprise. (not really)

If it talks, walks and looks exactly like NASA, as in having 100% the
exact same focus and mindset as NASA, as in treating Joe public and of
our private enterprise efforts like so much crap (especially if you're
not sufficiently Jewish), then it's NASA. As otherwise there's no
valid commercial reasoning as for the sorts of topic/author banishment
and/or exclusion of those in disagreement with the NASA/government
mainstream status quo policy, that is unless Imaginova is just playing
along their global domination part of acting like Hitler or perhaps
Kim Jong-il. BTW, we've known for a fact that many of those rich and
powerful Third Reich wizards of physics, chemical and rocket science
migrated their sorry butts into Canada in order to save their loot and
their often semitic roots, as from hiding out in Canada it soon enough
became a free ride to just about anywhere else in the world, including
all of those which subsequently worked directly for our government and
NASA.

I'll have to try offering this one more time, just for good measure.

Apparently NASA's personal infomercial spewing cloak of
uplink.space.com as part of IMAGINOVA is still into their failsafe
policy of banishing the truth w/o remorse and regardless of the
consequences. At least in that way our NASA gets to continually
exclude evidence while otherwise saying NO to the whole truth and
nothing but the truth all the time it likes, just like Hitler and our
resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).
http://www.imaginova.com/aboutus/

The IMAGINOVA borg collective (NASA's brown-nosed minions)
http://www.imaginova.com/partners/

In response to:
Poster: SPACEINVADOR
Subject: Japan's Lunar Probe
http://uplink.space.com/showthreaded...apsed&sb=5&o=0

"There just isn't much reward when it comes to pictures from space,
IMO. We can take great photographs from earth of space/stars, but we
can't get those same quality or even better pictures from space?...
I'm not talking about pictures from telescopes."

"Ok, in the Lunar Probe pictures we can see the earth just as if it
were being viewed at night, even though it is day on that spot of the
moon. Are cameras like the human eyes? Does the pupil not dilate due
to the brightness reflected off the surface of the moon? I think not.
If I was on the moon where the Lunar Probe is and I was looking up
into the "blackness" of space and my eyes weren't affected from the
reflected light of the moon's surface, shouldn't I be able to see
something up there in space? Come on."
-

My reply to "SPACEINVADOR" that didn't get posted due to IMAGINOVA
banishmant policies:
There are CCDs of 100+ fold better DR(dynamic range) than film, as far
greater DR than the human eye per given FOV that has our physically
dark moon and Earth to contend with.

16 db of 131,057:1 or even 20db of 1,048,576:1 are technically doable
within scientific configured cameras, or at the very least capable of
sliding their 12 bit 4,096:1 scope of DR pushed +/- 4 db towards
utilizing either extreme of the 20+db CCD potential has been doable
for quite some time. Instead we the public usually get to see all of
4, 5 or possibly as good as 6 db worth of those somewhat pastel
images, so as to easily exclude all but the brightest of local items
that'll fall within that intentionally limited DR, plus their version
of robo PhotoShop is what easily takes care of whatever else needs to
get excluded.

Basically, it's another pretend atheist sort of faith-based kind of
infowar/infomercial loaded card game that they are intent upon playing
by their own rules, and the stack of such cards is always loaded in
favor of the house. However, I honestly do not expect JAXA or
especially of China to play along with NASA's tired old game plan of
intentionally excluding such worthy items of other planets and a few
of the brightest of stars (such as Sirius) from those future images of
our physically dark as coal moon, nor should their gamma spectrum
worth of secondary/recoil photon science data as to identifying and
somewhat quantifying those surface minerals, as becoming so taboo/
nondisclosure rated.
-- Brad Guth

-
Well lo and behold, it obviously didn't take very long for those pesky
brown-nosed rusemaster clowns of NASA's uplink.space.com borg like
collective, and of their semitic mindset of Third Reich minions to
switch right back into full butt-covering damage control action.
(it's what such semites as pretend atheists do best, especially ever
since having put one of their own kind on a stick for that faith-based
PR stunt)

I expect once again they'll be excluding or otherwise banishing
everything I've had to say, just as they did before. Apparently
sharing the whole truth and nothing but the truth as based upon the
regular laws of physics and the best available science is simply
against uplink.space.com policy.

-
uplink.space.com goes directly into its usual book burning failsafe
mode:
"We cannot proceed."
"We encountered a problem. The reason reported was:"

"You have been banned from making any new posts or sending private
messages. The reason for this ban is: Returned banned member bradguth"

Gee Whiz folks, what another unexpected surprise. (though not really)

Apparently NASA and all of their mostly semitic brown-nosed pretend
atheist as devout minions are simply too deathly afraid of what I'd
said in the past, and especially of what I might further mention,
imply or otherwise draw attention to by way of offering an alternative
interpretation of our public mainstream information, such as utilizing
our public owned supercomputers for the greater good of running off
various orbital physics simulations, or on behalf of creating those
virtual R&D simulations for the tethered LSE-CM/ISS and otherwise for
establishing the Venus L2 POOF City as yet another viable space depot/
gateway.
- Brad Guth

And there's more terrific resolution stuff from KAGUYA (SELENE), that
by rights shouldn't have any problems detecting each and every
significant Apollo item. It's just a matter of time.

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071128_kaguya_e.html


BradGuth wrote:
Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Perhaps Japan and/or China will save the day, as proving once and for
all as to what our NASA/Apollo wizards accomplished or not, especially
as those two independent missions end their research of orbiting that
physically dark moon at the altitude of 10 km or less, thereby easily
getting those better than one meter/pixel images.

BTW, the well deserved name calling within Usenet only applies to
those pretending at being something other than they really are, and
especially bestowed upon those not willing to share the whole truth
and nothing but the truth that'll fit within those regular laws of
physics and align reasonably along with the best available science (w/
o excluding evidence). Thus far, it seems you've got next to nothing
to offer, so you have next to nothing to bitch about.

If we had safely landed upon and walked upon our physically dark and
dusty moon that's naked and thus unavoidably reactive/anticathode
worthy, as such there'd be all sorts of easily proven and otherwise
replicated science (as well as many other fly-by-rocket sorts of
landings) that's external to anything NASA/Apollo, as well as for
spendy supercomputer simulations would not be so taboo/nondisclosure
rated. Sadly, after nearly 4 decades and counting, that's still not
the case.

Once again, it seems the pretend atheists likes of "mommycal" and so
many others of their Zion brown-nosed minionship kind of NASA's
external Third Reich borg collective, as a swarm of such all-knowing
spooks and moles (aka MIB), that are really good at playing those
silly word games, as well as being such absolute pagan born-again
liars are the ones actually in charge. BTW, it seems CRAY--SGI is
not hardly out of business, as well as a few others doing their single
node supercomputers that we the public get to pay for.

mommycal (aka LLPOF):
Companies selling "supercomputers" have been out of business for a
least a decade.

OOPS!

"NASA gets SGI 2048-core Itanium 2 supercomputer"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....a286c9a2624d54

"This massive supercomputer is the most powerful single node computer
in the world (based on SPECint_rate2006 and SPECfp_rate2006 database)
and it has one of the largest single system memory pool in the world.
For some applications that simply can't be effectively broken down in
to smaller tasks that a cluster can handle using smaller nodes because
of excessive communications overhead, this is really the only system
that can crunch those hard problems."
(lots of other specs available)

Once again, we supposedly have the world's best supercomputer node of
2049 ultra fast CPUs and nearly countless terabytes worth of ultra
fast memory that's in those need to know hands of our NASA wizards, as
having been entirely bought, fully facilitated and sustained with 100%
public funds (including all of the software and those absolutely nifty
knock-your-socks-off work stations), yet because of their NASA/Apollo
cold-war ruse/sting of the century, as well as certain semitic faith-
based issues is why serious research simulations other than selected
by and/or moderated to death by those in charge of our hard earned
loot and our private parts are the one and only considerations
allowed.

Even though their RedHat Linux OS can safely share any number of those
CPUs for public or private applications, as well as running from the
vast in-house archive of their public owned software, whereas instead
there's no such access allowed. Which of course suits the likes our
Google/NOVA usenet of official spooks and moles plus their cloak and
dagger minions of uplink.space.com just fine and dandy.
- Brad Guth


On Nov 17, 8:55 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 16, 8:49 am, BradGuth wrote:

Oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the Chinese
moon mission that's closing in on what Japan has as an ongoing 3-
satellite observation and science gathering process, that'll each pick
up the slack where the previous US and Russian missions left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of danmage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy, we have this following
insignificant contribution by our very own "kT", but we should take
further notice as to how all the usenet lights tend to go out whenever
there's another not so insignificant speck of truth about our moon to
behold.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...http://www.jax...

Here's those previously unfiltered original images of the off-color
saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky secondary or recoil
worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our naked and thus
unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200...ttp://www.jaxa...

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
pixels as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth (adjusting
gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise by simply
replacing their image black with most any other color), though it's
still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice as to how
extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal like 0.11
albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty deep soft
lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very poorly
reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm quite honestly serious about this next part; do we
see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as though
being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075 albedo
worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as having
been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise physically
modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on behalf of those
hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly question, as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those full color spectrum
images of the moon are properly adjusted for their more natural to the
human eye's limited hue detection worth of color saturations, plus
those other nifty instruments start reporting their science data, as
well as from whatever China can uncover and share is just around the
very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

They are already down to 10 meters per pixel in raw image format, and
it's only going to get better as other science is obtained, especially
when applied into a composite image that'll allow us to see far more
depth, spectrum and detail than any naked human eye. Unless our
Boeing/Raytheon/TRW ABL cannon can manage to blind or simply roast
Selene's instruments, it's just a matter of time, isn't it.

China and Japan are clearly not about to be taking another NASA no for
an answer, and that's why this kind of fresh and honestly revealing
look-see with further science and planetology measurements other than
pictures are being accomplished by other than our crack NASA wizards
that have to concentrate their best talents upon keeping those semitic
butt-cracks as tight and straight as possible.

Quite oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon exploration mission, that's closing in on what Japan
already has as an ongoing 3-satellite observation and science
gathering process, that'll each pick up the slack where the previous
US and Russian missions of mostly hocus pocus disinformation and/or
evidence exclusion left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of damage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial, is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy is why we even have this
following insignificant contribution by our very own "kT". But we
should take a little further notice as to how all the usenet lights
tend to go out whenever there's another not so insignificant speck of
truth about our moon to behold, especially when such doesn't in any
way support as to what those as "having the right stuff" were tilling
us to believe.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kThttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_frm/thread/f38...
"Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!"

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's the first of their 20 and 10 meter resolution images, with
better than 10 meter resolution coming up next, and try to remember
that's prior to using any PhotoShop enlargement and subsequent
"unsharp" filter processing.http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/200...i03bands_l.jpg
"Figure 2: Comparison between the KAGUYA TC image and the Clementine
image
You can see the comparison between the image taken by the KAGUYA TC
cut out from the TC's first image data (the area encircled by the
yellow dot square in Figure 1) and the image shot by the high aerial
resolution camera onboard the Clementine Satellite. In the TC camera
image, you can see that the smaller craters (10-90 meters in size) and
the minute structure of the inside of a crater."http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img/20071116_kaguya_tc02_l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original HDTV images that offered
the expected off-color saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky
secondary or recoil worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our
naked and thus unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/200..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
elements as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth
(adjusting gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise
by simply replacing their image black with most any other color),
though it's still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice
as to how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal
like 0.11 albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty
deep soft lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very
poorly reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm being quite honestly serious about this next part;
do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise
physically modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on
behalf of those hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly loaded question,
as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those composite full color
spectrum images of the moon, as properly adjusted for their more
natural to the human eye's limited hue detection worth of color
saturations, plus those other nifty instruments start reporting their
science data, as well as from whatever China can uncover and share is
just around the very next corner.
--
Brad Guth