![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trick or Treat, it's Halloween at NASA.
A short recap of recent events. On a previous mission, NASA has great trouble folding an old and worn Solar Array. Even had to stop the folding process, send astronauts out with makeshift tool and reported to the nation the extreme dangers that astronauts must endure. It's Dangerous next to these solar array, surging with power. It seems that the braided guide wire has some broken strands. Between mission, NASA decides that many studies are required, to ensure that the Solar array can be unfurled. Many assumptions were made about what might occur. Tests were run on hypothetical situations. Braided strands broken, snags created, snags un-snagged, solar arrays unfurled. But, never considering which will break first, the solar array or the snagged strand of guide wire? Lulled into a fails sense of security, all is well, NASA had deluded themselves. The snag will un-snag. Not even knowing if there is a snag or how it is snagged. Ahh, life is good, time to unfurl. Oh look, it must be snagged! Don't worry, Studies indicate that the snag will un-snag 100% of the time, just keep pulling. OK. The answer to all important question of which will break first is ...... drum roll please ...... The Solar Array ..... Oops! Totally unprepared, NASA goes into high gear. Apollo 13 mode, Engage. Attention all hands, Emergency, Emergency, the solar array is broken. Lets make those makeshift tool again, it's jury-rig time. Danger, Danger Will Robinson, high voltage ahead, danger, danger. Even at Night, when the Moon is full, you never know when a goblin will... Ah, Treat, what a treat it was watching the drama unfold, along with the solar array. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Gaff wrote:
As a matter of interest, just what was the story of why the truss had to be where it was in the first place? Could they not have simply sent up some temporary arrays in the first place and delivered the truss etc, later on? OK, too simple I know. The truss is not just a structural piece; it contains power conversion and conditioning equipment that is required in order to use the power from the arrays. You cannot send up the arrays without the truss; it simply will not work. That is why they are called "Integrated Truss Segments". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No indeed, to continually repeat the same mistakes is not learning. It only
appears complex and hard when watching NASA select, and they seem to work hard making it appear that way. I didn't watch much of it at all, only the beginning and a few snip-its. I was shaking my head pretty early on, wonder, and turned it off. The over reliance on studies combined with lack on action, inaction, is baffling. Watched a little of a press conference, NASA studies a few snags for six months, and does nothing, that was my impression, I guess that's ISS. click Last Mission, the Shuttle, studies, inaction, works out ok. Just because it worked out ok, doesn't make it the best or only solution, it was just doing nothing and the only thing studied. Still kind of unbelievable, they weren't more careful knowing they had frayed wires. On a sailboat, you'll rub your bare hand down an old wire rope one time, and only one time, because you just made a bloody mess. That doesn't mean that you'll stop touching them, you just learn how do do it without bleeding all over the deck. There are many ways to learn something, doing things in Space is not totally new, in many it relates to other commonly done things here on Earth. Good job fixing the solar array, but consider how it became a bloody mess in the first place. NASA seems to keep doing it over, and over, and over again. And, is apparently proud of it, from what little of the Press Conference (a daily update) I watched. Columbia was an over reliance on studies and total lack of action too. This one wasn't life or death, just some frayed wires, but they had a long time to prepare and could bring things from the ground. Teflon is great in the space environment, teflon is real slippery, teflon would hold broken strands in place, teflon coated guide wires might perform much better. I wonder if the next set of arrays will have teflon coated guide wires? Brian Gaff wrote: Yes indeed. These are the ways things are learned. With many pieces of equipment failure modes can be so numerous as to be unpredictable. The more complex things get the more possibilities of course. As a matter of interest, just what was the story of why the truss had to be where it was in the first place? Could they not have simply sent up some temporary arrays in the first place and delivered the truss etc, later on? OK, too simple I know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It's Halloween, Trick or Treat, NASA style. | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 4th 07 12:26 PM |
News: Rutan Faults NASA on Apollo-Style Capsule | Rusty | History | 1 | June 5th 06 05:59 AM |
Did NASA trick Kerry? | Steve Dufour | Policy | 67 | August 22nd 04 05:02 PM |
A rare treat. | IWJPoel | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 11th 03 02:16 PM |