![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My girl friend called me yesterday morning. She wanted us to go see a
movie that evening. Something called “In the Shadow of the Moon”. I'd never heard of it, and the title suggested it was a chick-flik. It isn't. It's an Apollo documentary. Rather good, in fact. It consists of intercut interviews with most of the remaining Apollo astronauts, contemporary coverage, and period TV commercials added for spice. The interviews are recent, and the guys are more articulate than usual. The old footage looks better than ever – digitally cleaned up, perhaps? A clip of the old I've Got a Secret showed a Mr. and Mrs. Armstrong, whose secret was that their son Neil had just been named an astronaut. The quizmaster may have been the first person ever to ask them if they thought their son would ever go to the Moon. Centerpiece of the show was an extended session on the launch of Apollo 11. This is the first time, ever, that I've seen a film get the sound right! From anywhere a cameraman might be standing, the sound of the big engines igniting is heard *after* the rocket leaves the pad. Other films move the soundtrack up so the sound matches the ignition, ignoring the fact that it takes at least 15 seconds for the sound to travel from pad to cameraman. On the other hand, we heard Gene Cernan explaining that he had trained so long and hard to fly the Saturn V by hand that he almost wanted a guidance-system failure so that he could actually do it. I have no doubt that he had that training. I doubt that he had that training at the time of Apollo 11. I'm certain that he wasn't in a position to take over during the Apollo 11 launch – he was on the ground! It is a common practice in documentaries to edit the order of bits of interviews for the best flow of the story, even at the expense of historical accuracy. sigh... Both stagings were shown from the onboard cameras. We've seen this footage many times before, but I don't think I've ever seen them looking this good, and it is rare to see it uncut. When the interstage falls away, it looks like it is burning – can't be, as the second stage hasn't started yet. Anyone know it looks like the ring looks like it is surrounded by flam? The biggest disappointment: Armstrong wasn't interviewed. Watch the credits. The astronauts were asked what they thought about the moon hoax. The answers are amusing,. My favorite: “if it was a hoax, why did we do it 12 times?” New material was shot on HD digital and looked pretty good. Cinematography was TV-style, with most of the talking heads being framed as chin-to-mid-forehead. Rather harsh on even a small movie theater screen. The film looked like a not fully polished cut. Several slugs between scenes, and after the final credits, the screen when white, not black. Well worth seeing, but you might want to wait for it to show up on TV rather than paying for a theater ticket. -- Kevin Willoughby lid Kansas City, this was Air Force One. Will you change our call sign to SAM 27000? -- Col. Ralph Albertazzie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
In the shadow of the moon | Mark F. | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 21st 07 05:27 AM |
In the Shadow of the Moon | Kevin Willoughby | History | 36 | June 23rd 07 09:45 PM |
seeing the moon landers shadow by telescope!! | Hayley | UK Astronomy | 4 | February 26th 06 08:16 AM |
A planet, a moon, a shadow, and a spot | Drew | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | April 20th 05 09:22 AM |
Shadow on the Moon map | Michael Barlow | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 31st 03 04:56 PM |