A RACE TO REFUTE RELATIVITY IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT

http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?titl...&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Scientific American August 22, 2007 Hints of a breakdown of relativity
theory? "The MAGIC gamma-ray telescope team has just released an eye-
popping preprint (following up earlier work) describing what might be
the first observational hint of quantum gravity. What they've seen is
that higher-energy gamma rays appear to travel through space a little
bit slower than lower-energy ones, contrary to one of the postulates
underlying Einstein's special theory of relativity -- namely, that
radiation travels through the vacuum at the same speed no matter
what....The team ruled out the most obvious conventional effect, but
will have to do more to prove that new physics is at work -- this is
one of those "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
situations. But if the high-energy gammas really did lose the cosmic
race, we're talking Big Discovery."

Bravo Einsteinians bravo bravo bravo! Big Discovery and that's it!
Money could only come from Big Discovery from now on, not from old
miracles demonstrating how long trains are trapped inside short
tunnels, how either clock runs slower than the other but when they
meet one of them turns out to run faster and the respective twin is
older etc. People do not care about those miracles anymore. They read
Harry Potter.

Big Discovery years ago:

http://edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03...n03_index.html
Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special
theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can
implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the
former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin,
and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and
found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small
dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower
than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now
wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify
Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is
observed? The most severe possibility is that the principle of
relativity simply fails....But there is another possibility. This is
that the principle of relativity is preserved, but Einstein's special
theory of relativity requires modification so as to allow photons to
have a speed that depends on energy. The most shocking thing I have
learned in the last year is that this is a real possibility. A photon
can have an energy-dependent speed without violating the principle of
relativity!"

Big Discovery even more years ago:

http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?titl...&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
"Update (23 August): Dimitri Nanopoulos of Texas A&M tells me: "I am
very excited about this, because as you know we suggested this effect
about ten years ago..."

Bravo Einsteinians bravo bravo bravo! But who was the first Big
Discoverer? I suggest Big Discovery was first discovered by Big
Discoverer Albert Einstein in 1907:

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm Lee Smolin: "Quantum
theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few people have
appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories of
relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that the
laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that the
speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how the
source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that theory
are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary
relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not
absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF
INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG
WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PUBLISHING IT."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers...UP_TimesNR.pdf "What Can
We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the Theory of
Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there is no
comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The constancy
of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect homogeneity of
spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a special velocity
at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same velocity
everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to general
relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of light.
Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

Pentcho Valev

On 23 Aug, 19:11, Sam Wormley wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

Pentcho Valev

And as we all know, except for Pentcho, the correct interpretation would
come with General Relativity in 1915.

Your do not read what your masters teach do you? See what Master Steve
Carlip says about Einstein's behaviour in 1920, not in 1915:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._of_light.html
Steve Carlip: "Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of
relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and
he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In
the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he
wrote: . . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of
the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one
of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
[. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position. Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector
quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not
clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to
special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation
is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern
interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general
relativity."

As you can see, the problem is extremely difficult, even hypnotists in
Einstein criminal cult are totally confused, let alone silly zombies.
You should remain silent Wormley - your masters want you to remain
silent.

Pentcho Valev