![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the
Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"W. Watson" wrote in
. net: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Solar-Analemma.htm Klazmon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which
affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't believe I've ever heard of it, but another poster below provides
some details. Sam Wormley wrote: W. Watson wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? Have you taken into account the equation of time? -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the explanation, and to the posters above you. Yes, now I recall
the analemma. It's been a long time since I've considered it. I had a photo of it from Sky and Tel years ago. It's long disappeared. It was quite impressive. SkySea wrote: Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 4:03 pm, "W. Watson" wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, and to the posters above you. Yes, now I recall the analemma. It's been a long time since I've considered it. I had a photo of it from Sky and Tel years ago. It's long disappeared. It was quite impressive. SkySea wrote: Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net The 'analemma' is the astronomical equivalent of Piltdown man,in the astronomical sense that the 'analemma ' is a 17th century hoax developed by Flamsteed which has caused considerable mischief with very old and distinguished astronomical principles. http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html That treatise by Huygens tells you how the 24 hour day is created out of the variations in the natural noon cycle and subsequently it infers that as each 24 hour cycle elapses into the next 24 hour cycle,it provides the basis for the equivalence of 1 degree of geographical seperation for every 4 minutes of clock time making exactly 24 hours/ 360 degrees. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 5:50 am, SkySea wrote:
Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA Listen up because this is very important for climatological reasons and besides,we can now view the Earth from space to verify the accurate conception for why the Equation of Time exists and how to get rid of that primitive pseudo-dynamic of variable axial tilt to explain cyclical hemispherical weather patterns otherwise known as the seasons. If axial rotation did not exist and only the Earth's orbital motion was occuring,a location on Earth would not hold its same face to the Sun over the course of an annual orbit.It is very difficult to gauge on Earth but the extreme axial orientation of the planet Uranus helps to provide the explanation for what occurs to the Earth - http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html The reason that the natural noon cycles on Earth are unequal is due to the change in the orbital orientation of the Earth as axial cycle returns to noon,the variations have nothing to do with the Equatorial orientation to the Sun but rather the variations in the length of time it takes a longitudinal location to return to noon as it passes through variations in orbital orientation. Of course it is extremely important for climatological purposes but none of you seem to take anything seriously beyond congratulating yourselves on your magnification exercise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 11:34 am, oriel36 wrote:
On Aug 6, 5:50 am, SkySea wrote: Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA Listen up because this is very important for climatological reasons and besides,we can now view the Earth from space to verify the accurate conception for why the Equation of Time exists and how to get rid of that primitive pseudo-dynamic of variable axial tilt to explain cyclical hemispherical weather patterns otherwise known as the seasons. If axial rotation did not exist and only the Earth's orbital motion was occuring,a location on Earth would not hold its same face to the Sun over the course of an annual orbit.It is very difficult to gauge on Earth but the extreme axial orientation of the planet Uranus helps to provide the explanation for what occurs to the Earth - http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html The reason that the natural noon cycles on Earth are unequal is due to the change in the orbital orientation of the Earth as axial cycle returns to noon,the variations have nothing to do with the Equatorial orientation to the Sun but rather the variations in the length of time it takes a longitudinal location to return to noon as it passes through variations in orbital orientation. Of course it is extremely important for climatological purposes but none of you seem to take anything seriously beyond congratulating yourselves on your magnification exercise. The link I posted was incorrect insofar as it uses the extreme rotational orientation of Uranus to highlight what occurs on Earth. http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/niel/...us-seasons.jpg The same thing occurs on Earth as a location on the planet changes its orbital orientation to the Sun over the course of an annual cycle .The rate of change of orbital orientation and subsequently the differing times it takes a location to rotate to noon provide the only possible affirmation for Keplerian orbital geometry. The equivalency of 1 degree of geographical seperation (terrestrial longitudes) for 4 minutes of clock time making exactly 24 hours/360 degrees is an affirmation of both Copernican heliocentricity and Keplerian orbital geometry and is one of the great jewels of Western astronomy. The fact that students will not be taught properly as they return to school or rather be taught a phony conception which has an astrological core is one of the great human tragedies insofar as no authority exists to recognise the damage being done. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect you are thinking of Milankovich and ice ages?
oriel36 wrote: On Aug 6, 5:50 am, SkySea wrote: Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA Listen up because this is very important for climatological reasons and besides,we can now view the Earth from space to verify the accurate conception for why the Equation of Time exists and how to get rid of that primitive pseudo-dynamic of variable axial tilt to explain cyclical hemispherical weather patterns otherwise known as the seasons. If axial rotation did not exist and only the Earth's orbital motion was occuring,a location on Earth would not hold its same face to the Sun over the course of an annual orbit.It is very difficult to gauge on Earth but the extreme axial orientation of the planet Uranus helps to provide the explanation for what occurs to the Earth - http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html The reason that the natural noon cycles on Earth are unequal is due to the change in the orbital orientation of the Earth as axial cycle returns to noon,the variations have nothing to do with the Equatorial orientation to the Sun but rather the variations in the length of time it takes a longitudinal location to return to noon as it passes through variations in orbital orientation. Of course it is extremely important for climatological purposes but none of you seem to take anything seriously beyond congratulating yourselves on your magnification exercise. -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 3:27 pm, "W. Watson" wrote:
I suspect you are thinking of Milankovich and ice ages? oriel36 wrote: On Aug 6, 5:50 am, SkySea wrote: Yes, it has to do with the ellipticity of the earth's orbit, which affects something called the equation of time. The closer the earth is to perihelion, the faster it moves in its orbit, making the Sun appear to traverse the sky more slowly. "W. Watson" wrote: There seems to be a 15-16 minute difference between the two sunrises in the Subject? Anyone know why? Does it have to do with the elliptical the Earth's orbit? Something to do with a 325.25 day year? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA Listen up because this is very important for climatological reasons and besides,we can now view the Earth from space to verify the accurate conception for why the Equation of Time exists and how to get rid of that primitive pseudo-dynamic of variable axial tilt to explain cyclical hemispherical weather patterns otherwise known as the seasons. If axial rotation did not exist and only the Earth's orbital motion was occuring,a location on Earth would not hold its same face to the Sun over the course of an annual orbit.It is very difficult to gauge on Earth but the extreme axial orientation of the planet Uranus helps to provide the explanation for what occurs to the Earth - http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html The reason that the natural noon cycles on Earth are unequal is due to the change in the orbital orientation of the Earth as axial cycle returns to noon,the variations have nothing to do with the Equatorial orientation to the Sun but rather the variations in the length of time it takes a longitudinal location to return to noon as it passes through variations in orbital orientation. Of course it is extremely important for climatological purposes but none of you seem to take anything seriously beyond congratulating yourselves on your magnification exercise. -- Wayne Watson (Nevada City, CA) Web Page: speckledwithStars.net- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How brilliant you all are,how wonderfully intelligent and intutive are you responses as are your conceptions. http://www.nmm.ac.uk/server/show/nav.3116 Look at how a location keeps the same face to the Sun every 24 hours exactly even though such a conception is lethal for climatological studies. Look at how a location rotates to noon in 24 hours exactly even though it has been known for centuries,nay millenia that noon two daily noon cycles are the same. Marvel at how the axial and orbital motions of the Earth are justified using the return of a star to a meridian in 23 hours 56 minutes 04 seconds.Like fitting a round peg into a square hole,Flamsteed fitted 4 annual cycles of the Earth into a calendar system which is constructed of 3 years of 365 day and 1 year of 366 days.What a feat !!,even the creationists would be impressed with that pseudo-intellectual construct. Do you suspect,well I will too.I suspect that the damage is so severe,the empirical indoctrination is so deep and pervasive that humanity will have to settle into a long inglorious period of an intellectual and intutive winter.The sterility of the conceptions which form the astrological core of empiricism and unwittingly created by one man - John Flamsteed represent the complete destruction of Earth sciences where the motions of the Earth are involved and especially in areas such as climatology and geology. You want your analemmas and your 'sidereal day' and ignore the correlation which keeps clocks in sync with the axial cycle at precisely 24 hours/360 degrees but when intellectual and intutive intelligence winds down to that level it exists as a holocaust mentality.Even with the great work of Huygens before you,the indoctrination cuts so deep that the enjoyable correlation withers into the pretensious and useless 'sidereal day' justification where the noon cycles are 24 hours exactly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crisp First Autumnal Morn | Double-A | Misc | 15 | September 28th 06 03:00 AM |
Precession of the Equinoxes | AK47 | Astronomy Misc | 5 | June 29th 06 12:06 AM |
Asymmetry of the Atlas V | Proponent!!!N0_SP@[email protected] | Technology | 4 | February 10th 06 12:42 AM |
autumnal equinox - exact times 1970s | Tim923 | Misc | 1 | September 29th 04 11:02 PM |
Precession of the equinoxes?? | Alan Brown | Misc | 4 | July 12th 04 08:05 AM |