![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is there any reason why, if you know the ideal range of your test, that you couldn't start at 70% of the mirrors diameter, and set your dial at 50% of range and test each way from there? I'm having a devil of a time precisely nulling the central zone, and it is going to be behind the diagonal anyway. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any reason why, if you know the ideal range of your test, that
you couldn't start at 70% of the mirrors diameter, and set your dial at 50% of range and test each way from there? I'm having a devil of a time precisely nulling the central zone, and it is going to be behind the diagonal anyway. You are better off asking this on the atm list, but the short answer is it doesn't matter where you start, as the readings are relative. Dennis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foucault and Collimation webpages going off line | LarryG | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | June 26th 05 08:14 PM |
Need Simple Foucault Pendulum Explanation | Dennis Woos | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | March 11th 04 06:18 AM |
Foucault kit? | starman | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | December 19th 03 01:42 AM |
first time Foucault attempts kind of long | brocpuffs | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | December 12th 03 09:43 PM |
star test question | bwhiting | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 25th 03 11:38 PM |