A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Delta Crux



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 19th 07, 08:19 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Eugene Griessel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 336
Default Delta Crux

Just how variable a star is Delta Crux? I sometimes come out and look
up and the Cross seems to be missing its forth star and at other times
the fourth star is fairly bright. According to data I have the
variability should not have a major effect on the brightness - or am I
wrong ?


Eugene L Griessel

Experienced? Let me tell you lad, when God said: Let there
be light! I was the duty electrician.
  #6  
Old April 20th 07, 06:28 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Eugene Griessel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 336
Default Delta Crux

elaich wrote:

(Eugene Griessel) wrote in news:46271795.4990979
:

Just how variable a star is Delta Crux?


Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation
changed and I never found out?


A rose by any other name ... yes, your nitpick is correct Delta
Crucis.

Eugene L Griessel

It is easier to get older than it is to get wiser.
  #7  
Old April 20th 07, 02:25 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Delta Crux

On 20 Apr 2007 02:55:52 GMT, elaich wrote:

Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation
changed and I never found out?


If you're a Roman, or perhaps an astronomer who got stuck in the
linguistic conventions of the Middle Ages g.

I use Delta Crux, myself. The best way to change English usage is to
start with your own.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #8  
Old April 20th 07, 05:11 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
laura halliday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 168
Default Delta Crux

On Apr 20, 6:25 am, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On 20 Apr 2007 02:55:52 GMT, elaich wrote:

Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation
changed and I never found out?


If you're a Roman, or perhaps an astronomer who got stuck in the
linguistic conventions of the Middle Ages g.

I use Delta Crux, myself. The best way to change English usage is to
start with your own.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com


You can call it anything you like, but if you depart from
established conventions, you may find yourself doing
more explaining than communicating. Only you can
decide if it's worth the hassle.

Personally, my struggle is with ancient versus modern/
scientific pronunciation: is it "kroo-sis" (modern), or
"kroo-kis" (ancient)? Since the ancient pronunciation
is purely phonetic, I tend to memorize words that way.
Sorta like Castilian vs Latin American Spanish...

Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre
Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte

  #9  
Old April 20th 07, 05:26 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Delta Crux

On 20 Apr 2007 09:11:33 -0700, laura halliday
wrote:

You can call it anything you like, but if you depart from
established conventions, you may find yourself doing
more explaining than communicating. Only you can
decide if it's worth the hassle.


It hasn't proved to be any problem. It occasionally comes up in
discussions like this, but otherwise requires no explanation. There's no
possibility of confusion (in fact, non-astronomers are _more_ likely to
be confused by the use of the Latin genitive- something I see
deliberately explained occasionally in articles), so communication isn't
a problem. Some people don't notice, some don't care, a few probably
think I'm semi-literate. But everyone understands.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #10  
Old April 20th 07, 10:03 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Ben
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Delta Crux

Eugene,

Burnham's Handbook does not indicate any variability
for Delta Crucis. Neither do any of my charts.

But do you remember about seven or eight years ago
Delta Scorpius inexplicably brightened by 0.9 magnitudes
and has not faded since then AFAIKT. Might be a good
idea to keep an eye on it to determine if it's acting up.

Ben

Quid vespera ferat incertum est.
Livy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Self-similar Crux" southern cross is decreasing spiral of stars. BlagooBlanaa Amateur Astronomy 1 July 14th 06 05:13 AM
Delta-IV Heavy First Flight Status & Delta-IV Growth Options Iain Young Policy 6 August 14th 04 09:37 PM
delta V from L1 to L4 Alex Terrell Technology 3 January 16th 04 06:40 PM
Delta IV / GOES-N Mike Chan Policy 1 November 8th 03 06:10 AM
Delta 4 + SeaLaunch = Delta 5? Dholmes Policy 10 August 15th 03 01:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.