![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just how variable a star is Delta Crux? I sometimes come out and look
up and the Cross seems to be missing its forth star and at other times the fourth star is fairly bright. According to data I have the variability should not have a major effect on the brightness - or am I wrong ? Eugene L Griessel Experienced? Let me tell you lad, when God said: Let there be light! I was the duty electrician. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message ... wrote: On Apr 19, 7:19 pm, (Eugene Griessel) wrote: Just how variable a star is Delta Crux? I sometimes come out and look up and the Cross seems to be missing its forth star and at other times the fourth star is fairly bright. According to data I have the variability should not have a major effect on the brightness - or am I wrong ? Eugene L Griessel Experienced? Let me tell you lad, when God said: Let there be light! I was the duty electrician. Maybe because you are viewing it at a fairly low altitude where both the atmospheric extinction and skyglow is at its' worst. Currently about 50 degrees altitude by about 2100 hours. Sky gin clear and virtually no skyglow. However last night, at about 2200 hours one had to stare for a while before delta crux could be discerned . At 2340 it was immediately obvious. Both instances walked out of the same lighted room to the same spot on my lawn and looked up. Eugene L Griessel I try to make everyone's day a little more surreal. A little bit of high cloud obscuring it a bit maybe? Terry B Armidale NSW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
elaich wrote:
(Eugene Griessel) wrote in news:46271795.4990979 : Just how variable a star is Delta Crux? Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation changed and I never found out? A rose by any other name ... yes, your nitpick is correct Delta Crucis. Eugene L Griessel It is easier to get older than it is to get wiser. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Apr 2007 02:55:52 GMT, elaich wrote:
Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation changed and I never found out? If you're a Roman, or perhaps an astronomer who got stuck in the linguistic conventions of the Middle Ages g. I use Delta Crux, myself. The best way to change English usage is to start with your own. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 6:25 am, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On 20 Apr 2007 02:55:52 GMT, elaich wrote: Not trying to nitpick, but isn't it Delta Crucis? Or has the designation changed and I never found out? If you're a Roman, or perhaps an astronomer who got stuck in the linguistic conventions of the Middle Ages g. I use Delta Crux, myself. The best way to change English usage is to start with your own. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com You can call it anything you like, but if you depart from established conventions, you may find yourself doing more explaining than communicating. Only you can decide if it's worth the hassle. Personally, my struggle is with ancient versus modern/ scientific pronunciation: is it "kroo-sis" (modern), or "kroo-kis" (ancient)? Since the ancient pronunciation is purely phonetic, I tend to memorize words that way. Sorta like Castilian vs Latin American Spanish... Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..." ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Apr 2007 09:11:33 -0700, laura halliday
wrote: You can call it anything you like, but if you depart from established conventions, you may find yourself doing more explaining than communicating. Only you can decide if it's worth the hassle. It hasn't proved to be any problem. It occasionally comes up in discussions like this, but otherwise requires no explanation. There's no possibility of confusion (in fact, non-astronomers are _more_ likely to be confused by the use of the Latin genitive- something I see deliberately explained occasionally in articles), so communication isn't a problem. Some people don't notice, some don't care, a few probably think I'm semi-literate. But everyone understands. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eugene,
Burnham's Handbook does not indicate any variability for Delta Crucis. Neither do any of my charts. But do you remember about seven or eight years ago Delta Scorpius inexplicably brightened by 0.9 magnitudes and has not faded since then AFAIKT. Might be a good idea to keep an eye on it to determine if it's acting up. Ben Quid vespera ferat incertum est. Livy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Self-similar Crux" southern cross is decreasing spiral of stars. | BlagooBlanaa | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 14th 06 05:13 AM |
Delta-IV Heavy First Flight Status & Delta-IV Growth Options | Iain Young | Policy | 6 | August 14th 04 09:37 PM |
delta V from L1 to L4 | Alex Terrell | Technology | 3 | January 16th 04 06:40 PM |
Delta IV / GOES-N | Mike Chan | Policy | 1 | November 8th 03 06:10 AM |
Delta 4 + SeaLaunch = Delta 5? | Dholmes | Policy | 10 | August 15th 03 01:17 AM |