This is the Shape the BB had - +

Yes it was cone shaped.at the very beginning Nature creates in pairs.
Our negative universe,and its positive twin exploded away from each
other back to back. This theory explains why no anti-particles are
found in our universe. This theory gives reality for the reason both
universes were not destroyed instantly. Is this theory not better than
saying "nature made more of our particles than the other". We should be
ashamed of ourselves for blaming mother nature for not doing her
measurements right.Nature does her balancing act 100% evenly
Bert

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Yes it was cone shaped.at the very beginning Nature creates in pairs.
Our negative universe,and its positive twin exploded away from each
other back to back. This theory explains why no anti-particles are
found in our universe.

More nonsense Beert?


This theory gives reality for the reason both
universes were not destroyed instantly. Is this theory not better than
saying "nature made more of our particles than the other". We should be
ashamed of ourselves for blaming mother nature for not doing her
measurements right.Nature does her balancing act 100% evenly
Bert



Stick to drinking.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote in message
news
In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Yes it was cone shaped.at the very beginning Nature creates in pairs.
Our negative universe,and its positive twin exploded away from each
other back to back. This theory explains why no anti-particles are
found in our universe.

More nonsense Beert?


This theory gives reality for the reason both
universes were not destroyed instantly. Is this theory not better than
saying "nature made more of our particles than the other". We should be
ashamed of ourselves for blaming mother nature for not doing her
measurements right.Nature does her balancing act 100% evenly
Bert



Stick to drinking.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

Originally Posted by Phineas T Puddleduck[_2_]

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Yes it was cone shaped.at the very beginning Nature creates in pairs.
Our negative universe,and its positive twin exploded away from each
other back to back. This theory explains why no anti-particles are
found in our universe.

More nonsense Beert?


This theory gives reality for the reason both
universes were not destroyed instantly. Is this theory not better than
saying "nature made more of our particles than the other". We should be
ashamed of ourselves for blaming mother nature for not doing her
measurements right.Nature does her balancing act 100% evenly
Bert



Stick to drinking.

--

Stick to buggery, Ducko!

Daffy Duck wit I drink well I think well,and I sleep fair Bert

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Daffy Duck wit I drink well I think well,and I sleep fair Bert

And spout nonsense, like a good saucerhead.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."