More Moon Data

nightbat wrote

To address the discussion going on between Officer Bert
and Scott cited link of collected Moon data is link presented.

See:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_16.htm

What the moon really is can be directed to profound researchers further
investigations.

ponder on,
the nightbat

In article ,
nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrote

To address the discussion going on between Officer Bert
and Scott cited link of collected Moon data is link presented.

See:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_16.htm

What the moon really is can be directed to profound researchers further
investigations.

ponder on,
the nightbat


Posting useless websites from loons still NB

Let me correct you

http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/moon_worldbook.html

A much more RELIABLE source.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:
(How many days till he replies - best guess is five!)
"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

Thank you nightbat. Even if Scotty read this he will still go with the
explosion theory.I read the book Asminov wrote on the Moon. we know for
a fact Moon is older than Earth. To me not having metals as compared to
the Earth surface was proof enough that the Moon never was part of the
Earth. Also read that the moon could have hollow core,and that would be
the only large object in the universe that has one(we know of). I
once posted a round hollowed out ice ball would make a nice space ship.
Kind of fits. Evidence and good science shows us that Moon and Earth
were never "once upon a time" one object. Bert

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Thank you nightbat. Even if Scotty read this he will still go with the
explosion theory.I read the book Asminov wrote on the Moon. we know for
a fact Moon is older than Earth. To me not having metals as compared to
the Earth surface was proof enough that the Moon never was part of the
Earth. Also read that the moon could have hollow core,and that would be
the only large object in the universe that has one(we know of). I
once posted a round hollowed out ice ball would make a nice space ship.
Kind of fits. Evidence and good science shows us that Moon and Earth
were never "once upon a time" one object. Bert


You should read some books published after 1950

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:
(How many days till he replies - best guess is five!)
"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:46:11 +0000, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Thank you nightbat. Even if Scotty read this he will still go with the
explosion theory.I read the book Asminov wrote on the Moon. we know for
a fact Moon is older than Earth. To me not having metals as compared to
the Earth surface was proof enough that the Moon never was part of the
Earth. Also read that the moon could have hollow core,and that would be
the only large object in the universe that has one(we know of). I
once posted a round hollowed out ice ball would make a nice space ship.
Kind of fits. Evidence and good science shows us that Moon and Earth
were never "once upon a time" one object. Bert


You should read some books published after 1950

Besides, "Asminov" (Asimov) never wrote any books on the Moon. He
wrote all of his books and short stories right here on Earth.
--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

"Maths proves you know how to plug in some figures into a formula, that's
all"
"Even physics is based on wrong theories, so what's the use of maths"
Carole - demonstrating her mathematical abilities.

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Thank you nightbat. Even if Scotty read this he will still go with the
explosion theory.I read the book Asminov wrote on the Moon. we know for
a fact Moon is older than Earth. To me not having metals as compared to
the Earth surface was proof enough that the Moon never was part of the
Earth. Also read that the moon could have hollow core,and that would be
the only large object in the universe that has one(we know of). I
once posted a round hollowed out ice ball would make a nice space ship.
Kind of fits. Evidence and good science shows us that Moon and Earth
were never "once upon a time" one object. Bert


nightbat

You're always welcome Major Bert and I try to help and always
back my profound Science Officers whenever I can. Scott lost and he
knows it so don't worry cause mainstream fudging is well known. The
elite Science Team questions everything and never settles for google
cast in stone bird brain accepted hype, sheesh! And by the sheer volumes
of auk coffeeboy crossposting indicates the waves my Science Officers
are making and attempts by the clueless to always downplay our inroads
into advancing science.

The Moon Earth's satellite is an enigma and Darla has claimed
the Seans have a base there. That they also witnessed the astronauts
moon landings was confirmed by sent back reports to Nasa Command Central
of boogies by the astronauts. The moon mission findings of raised
question of possibility of a natural system hollow moon satellite was
addressed by Dr. Carl Sagan and deemed not possible but only of
artificial make-up. The far dark side of the moon is perfect for hiding
the Sean protective activities and they know we are getting close to
hopeful further deep space conquest.

Try not to be too hard on our old friend Scott because we know he's just
a bright eyed babe in the woods, trying to make wondrous sense of it
all. It's our profound Science Officer duty to try to theory serve and
help even some of the most pessimistic doubting nasty ones.

carry on,
the nightbat

In article ,
nightbat wrote:

nightbat

You're always welcome Major Bert and I try to help and always
back my profound Science Officers whenever I can. Scott lost and he
knows it so don't worry cause mainstream fudging is well known. The
elite Science Team questions everything and never settles for google
cast in stone bird brain accepted hype, sheesh! And by the sheer volumes
of auk coffeeboy crossposting indicates the waves my Science Officers
are making and attempts by the clueless to always downplay our inroads
into advancing science.

What fudginf frooty. Point out exactly what fudging you lying little toad. Your
inbuilt stupidity on science is pretty pathetic.


The Moon Earth's satellite is an enigma and Darla has claimed
the Seans have a base there.

Still masturbating over walrii?

That they also witnessed the astronauts
moon landings was confirmed by sent back reports to Nasa Command Central
of boogies by the astronauts.

Cite sources, liar.

The moon mission findings of raised
question of possibility of a natural system hollow moon satellite was
addressed by Dr. Carl Sagan and deemed not possible but only of
artificial make-up. The far dark side of the moon is perfect for hiding
the Sean protective activities and they know we are getting close to
hopeful further deep space conquest.

60 years old and still playing space cadet. How sad.


Try not to be too hard on our old friend Scott because we know he's just
a bright eyed babe in the woods, trying to make wondrous sense of it
all. It's our profound Science Officer duty to try to theory serve and
help even some of the most pessimistic doubting nasty ones.


Ah yes - your PESO's who have run away screaming from every question.

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:
(How many days till he replies - best guess is five!)
"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

nightbat Win or lose discussing theories on science is a winning
situation. I know that Dr. Harold Urey went with the "capture theory"
but when I posted this to Scotty he came back with this "Who cares what
Urey thinks"? That is not nice. After all Urey did win a Nobel and
other than Scotty's thinking most people do give Nobel scientists great
respect. Go figure Bert

In article ,
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

nightbat Win or lose discussing theories on science is a winning
situation. I know that Dr. Harold Urey went with the "capture theory"
but when I posted this to Scotty he came back with this "Who cares what
Urey thinks"? That is not nice. After all Urey did win a Nobel and
other than Scotty's thinking most people do give Nobel scientists great
respect. Go figure Bert


Which was in 1934. Way before a lot of work was done in solar system dynamics.

"Go figure"

--

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish." Painius

Ducky wit He was a chemist,and lots of chemistry was done on the 830
lb moon rocks. Go figure that out Ducky wit using what little brain
you have. His students lived on to do the testing,and were taught by the
best,and not by Scotty's witless brain,that can only produce
non-brainers graduating from LU Sad but reality Bert