![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Okay, we've got X-33, X-34, X-37, X-38, and X-43 that've either failed or had big-time problems. Were there any X-type space-related projects during the Clinton era that succeeded? Only DC-X. Damn Clinton for pushing and signing into law the "Make Aeronautical Engineering Really Difficult For Big Stupid Bureaucracies" Act of 1993! Damn him! And how did he find the time while having all that sex in the Oval Office? George W. Bush, in contrast, has had plenty of time to develop the "Christian Nutballs and Big Business In Orbit" initiative. This will truly open up the heavens, from which real Americans can look down upon liberals, gays, eco-nazis, the National League, and other traitorous losers left squirming on the filthy Earth. :_ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, we've got X-33, X-34, X-37, X-38, and X-43 that've either failed or
had big-time problems. Were there any X-type space-related projects during the Clinton era that succeeded? DC-X, X-40a. X-37 and arguably X-43 haven't had worse problems than the X-15 program. X-38 was actually reasonably succesful as an X-craft. It was mothballed before producing an operational prototype, but that really isn't the proper function of X-craft. Will McLean |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |