![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded.
This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. I think from that first colour photo it is proven that Gusev indeed held running water. Nathan Rogers Australia |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blurrt" wrote in message u... Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. Or wind. Doc |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blurrt" writes:
Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. Not neccessarily. Dust blowing over it for a few million years may have quite similar effects. BTW mistaking the effects of winds and dust for effects of water seems to be all too easy when dealing with features on Mars. I think from that first colour photo it is proven that Gusev indeed held running water. *If* there was water once, nothing that was in direct contact with it will be found on the surface. The mission planers are expecting to look at debris from (later) impacts, which may have digged deep enough to shatter sediments from below over the surface. Jochem -- "A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
January 6, 2003
Jochem Huhmann wrote: *If* there was water once, Oh great, yet another Mars water denialist. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net/mars.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Blurrt wrote:
Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. This is Mars, a gentle planet-sized sandblaster... I think from that first colour photo it is proven that Gusev indeed held running water. I wouldn't say it immediately looks that way to me. -- -Andrew Gray |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gray wrote:
In article , Blurrt wrote: Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. This is Mars, a gentle planet-sized sandblaster... I think from that first colour photo it is proven that Gusev indeed held running water. I wouldn't say it immediately looks that way to me. I does kind of *look* like that, but looking at it really isn't definitive or compelling. Besides, I though Gusev was a lake, and it takes running water to round off rocks like that. The wind, over probably 4-ish billion years, could easily cause the same effect. Brett |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In m,
Brett Buck spewed: Andrew Gray wrote: In article , Blurrt wrote: Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. This is Mars, a gentle planet-sized sandblaster... I think from that first colour photo it is proven that Gusev indeed held running water. I wouldn't say it immediately looks that way to me. I does kind of *look* like that, but looking at it really isn't definitive or compelling. Besides, I though Gusev was a lake, and it takes running water to round off rocks like that. The wind, over probably 4-ish billion years, could easily cause the same effect. Brett I'm pretty sure I'm talking out of my ass here, but here's my question. Is the Reynolds number for Martian atmospheric flow (wind) in any way comparable to Earth-normal water flow? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:07:01 GMT, "drdoody"
wrote: "Blurrt" wrote in message . au... Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. Or wind. Wind blown dust you mean. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
January 6, 2004
Christopher wrote: Or wind. Wind blown dust you mean. Sure, wind blown sub-micron dust in a 6 to 10 mbar atmosphere, dust which we know is NOT composed of the same material as the rocks, erodes the rocks smooth. And all that water, over millions of years, which just a few year ago didn't even exist in the minds of many, erodes very little. I don't think so. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "drdoody" wrote in message y.com... "Blurrt" wrote in message u... Just looking at the rocks on the floor of Gusev crater - they are rounded. This implies water (or some other fluid) erosion. Or wind. Doc Yeah, I suppose. The NASA website states that too (which is where I suppose you got the idea). It just seems to me that if we have an inflow channel then there should be some signs of erosion associated with that inflow. I guess the rocks need to be overturned by the rover to see if they are smooth underneath as well. (Check out the airbag disturbed pics) Nathan. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Endurance Crater - curious flattening of martian rocks | Nate Smith | Science | 0 | July 4th 04 08:11 AM |
Layered rock at Gusev? | mars life 2004 | Science | 0 | February 13th 04 09:19 PM |
Scientist Thrilled to See Layers in Mars Rocks Near Opportunity | Ron | Science | 0 | January 28th 04 01:29 AM |
Mars Rover Scientists Don't Judge a Book by its Cover | Ron | Science | 0 | January 12th 04 04:29 PM |
CRATER to be updated? | Dan Foster | Space Shuttle | 4 | September 18th 03 03:47 PM |