A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FIA: not to worry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 5th 03, 02:30 PM
Allen Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FIA: not to worry

US official confident about Boeing spy satellite
Reuters, 10.28.03, 5:10 PM ET
By Andrea Shalal-Esa
[EXCERPT]

WASHINGTON, Oct 28 (Reuters) - The Pentagon mapping and imagery
agency on Tuesday said it was "very comfortable" about next-
generation spy satellites being built by Boeing Co. after $4
billion in cash infusions and a major overhaul.

"Right now, the cost schedule and performance parameters are in
balance. We may not fund everything that people had in their
mind's eye way back when, but it will be a very healthy, robust
program," retired Air Force Gen. James Clapper, director of the
National Imagery and Mapping Agency, told reporters at a briefing.

Lawmakers this year backed plans to overhaul the classified
Future Imagery Architecture program, slated to cost $10 billion
to $25 billion, despite major cost overruns and delays.

The Pentagon's Defense Science Board underscored the extent of
FIA's woes in a scathing report, concluding that the program,
which was designed to improve satellite coverage by orbiting a
larger number of spacecraft, was "not executable."

Clapper said big improvements had been made since the science
board report, including creation of a joint management office run
by NIMA and the National Reconnaissance Office.

"I'm very comfortable with it now," Clapper said of FIA, which
will be equipped with digital optical and radar sensors.

He also dismissed as "hyperbole" concerns that delays in new
programs, coupled with the age of existing satellites could
result in a gap in U.S. satellite capability.

"I suppose you can always postulate some series of catastrophes
that would pose this threat of a gap ... or the risk of the
nation going blind, but I frankly don't see a whole lot of prospect
for that," Clapper said.

But he said it was important to ensure that the U.S. was not reliant
on a single satellite system, one main reason Clapper said he backed
increased use of commercial imagery.

"I think a lot of this gap talk is a bit overblown," he said.
  #2  
Old November 5th 03, 07:11 PM
Allen Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FIA: not to worry

WASHINGTON, Oct 28 (Reuters) - The Pentagon mapping and imagery
agency on Tuesday said it was "very comfortable" about next-
generation spy satellites being built by Boeing Co. after $4
billion in cash infusions and a major overhaul.

"Right now, the cost schedule and performance parameters are in
balance. We may not fund everything that people had in their
mind's eye way back when, but it will be a very healthy, robust
program," retired Air Force Gen. James Clapper, director of the
National Imagery and Mapping Agency, told reporters at a briefing.


I'm going to try to get a transcript of all of this, but apparently
the briefing was at "a Defense Writers Group breakfast."

Also
  #3  
Old December 4th 03, 02:40 PM
Allen Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FIA: not to worry

Well, maybe worry a little bit.


http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000470.asp


Seems to be a popular theme in the newsrooms:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/04/bu.../04boeing.html

Boeing Lags in Building Spy Satellites
By DOUGLAS JEHL
The New York Times
December 4, 2003
[EXCERPTS]

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 - The Boeing Company is running more than
a year behind schedule and billions of dollars over cost on a
highly classified program to build the next generation of
reconnaissance satellites, forcing the government to shift an
estimated $4 billion from other spy programs, senior government
officials said on Wednesday...


[snip -- most of the story is a rehash of stuff already reported]

Last July, Boeing was denied more than $1 billion in Pentagon
orders after it was found in possession of proprietary documents
from Lockheed Martin, but those documents were related to a 1998
competition to develop a rocket for military satellites rather
than to the next-generation satellite program itself.

[Early on in the stolen-documents story, there was a report in the
5 May 2003 Wall Street Journal that some FIA-related ones were
involved: http://tinyurl.com/xp84. I haven't seen anything more
about that.]

...other senior government officials, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, said they thought there was still no more than a 50-50
chance that Boeing would meet its new scaled-back goal for
launching the first of the new generation of satellites in 2006.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.