![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As mentioned in a circular issued by the Minor Planet Center. See the
Sky and Telescope web site. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
robert casey wrote: As mentioned in a circular issued by the Minor Planet Center. See the Sky and Telescope web site. So Pluto became asteroid #134340.... It could have become #10000 instead: in March 1999, when the number of numbered asteroids approached 10000, Brian Marsden suggested that Pluto should become #10000. The idea was that Pluto would get dual status as both planet and asteroid (somewhat like Chiron, which is both asteroid #2060 Chiron and comet 95P/Chiron). This didn't happen - instead #10000 became an ordinary asteroid, Myriostos. And Pluto became asteroid #134340 instead of #10000 .... And in 1999, "Save Pluto" campaigns also popped up..... If Pluto had received an asteroid number soon after its discovery, it would have been asteroid #1164 (approximately) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only trolls and new borns care!
robert casey wrote: As mentioned in a circular issued by the Minor Planet Center. See the Sky and Telescope web site. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2006 | [email protected] | History | 0 | June 26th 06 03:34 AM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2006 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 26th 06 03:34 AM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2006 | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 26th 06 03:33 AM |
Space Calendar - May 24, 2006 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 24th 06 04:12 PM |
Space Calendar - May 24, 2006 | [email protected] | News | 0 | May 24th 06 04:11 PM |