![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Colleagues,
Day 3 in Logan, UT was mainly listening to presentations about new smallsat missions in work or proposed. One of the conference organizers, Robert Meurer of AeroAstro, made a pointed comment that, in the "Future Missions" session, where people reported on innovative missions in the development stages, ALL papers were from outside the US (France, Japan, Malaysia, etc.) There was a general consensus on the part of American microsat developers that US restrictions on export of microsats and use of foreign launchers, combined with the high cost of the only domestic small launchers and the near-absence of secondary payload opportunities, was strangling the microsat industry that the US pioneered, as well as making hands-on opportunities for the next generation of engineers very scarce. One fellow commented that one thing that's not well-documented yet is how much the lack of a low-cost dedicated microsat launcher affects costs by causing stretchouts in programs waiting years for launch. I told him we'd cited that as a factor in our paper this year but did not have timeyet to quantify it. Matt Bille ) OPINIONS IN ALL POSTS ARE SOLELY THOSE OF THE AUTHOR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Smallsat Conference Day 2 | MattWriter | Policy | 0 | August 13th 03 01:45 AM |
From Smallsat Conference, Day 1 | Ian Stirling | Policy | 0 | August 12th 03 10:41 AM |