Interesting shot of sunlight on the moon

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...11_40_5903.jpg

You'd think the sun would be big enough to light up the whole scene in this shot, and not just one
tiny little area.

It's also interesting that the horizon only comes up to middle of the poser's head, and less then
shoulder heighth of the photographer. Wow, that's one TINY little moon!

I also find it interesting that the shadows of the two people's reflections off the helmet have such
a huge difference in the length of their shadows.

There are many more inconsistencies in lighting that prove than in no way was this photo taken on
the moon. I'll let you find them. I'll give you a hint. Can you say BACKDROP?

This is a studio photo.

"Spaz" wrote in message
. ..
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...11_40_5903.jpg

You'd think the sun would be big enough to light up the whole scene in
this shot, and not just one tiny little area.

It's also interesting that the horizon only comes up to middle of the
poser's head, and less then shoulder heighth of the photographer. Wow,
that's one TINY little moon!

I also find it interesting that the shadows of the two people's
reflections off the helmet have such a huge difference in the length of
their shadows.

There are many more inconsistencies in lighting that prove than in no way
was this photo taken on the moon. I'll let you find them. I'll give you
a hint. Can you say BACKDROP?

This is a studio photo.


1) the sun is lighting up the entire area - you can clearly see this. You
can also clearly see the brighter area behind/around (but not in front) the
astro, caused by reflection/scatter of sunlight back to the ground.In
short - those area's are receiving almost twice as many photon's so appear
doubly bright. yes - the astro's suits are WHITE!

2) The camera is located on on the chest area of the tog, and pic will
appear to show the horizon lower than it actually is regardless of any other
factors as long as you concentrate on the astro. 2B) they are standing on a
slope.

3) Uh - are you totally thi*k or what? The visor is curved. Objects
reflected in the bottom half will always appear longer than they are - those
toward the middle will be closer to reality. Also see 2b.

Please feel free to point out the *many* other area's where your knowledge
falls well short of that required for taking a dump.

Scott

In article , Spaz
wrote:

There are many more inconsistencies in lighting that prove than in no way was
this photo taken on
the moon. I'll let you find them. I'll give you a hint. Can you say
BACKDROP?

This is a studio photo.

Get a life *and* a clue.

"Spaz" wrote in message
. ..
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...11_40_5903.jpg

You'd think the sun would be big enough to light up the whole scene in
this shot, and not just one tiny little area.

It's also interesting that the horizon only comes up to middle of the
poser's head, and less then shoulder heighth of the photographer. Wow,
that's one TINY little moon!

I also find it interesting that the shadows of the two people's
reflections off the helmet have such a huge difference in the length of
their shadows.

There are many more inconsistencies in lighting that prove than in no way
was this photo taken on the moon. I'll let you find them. I'll give you
a hint. Can you say BACKDROP?

This is a studio photo.

Only a moron like Spaz would believe that this is a studio image.
Congratulations.

George

An extraordinay claim requires extraordinary evidence.

NASA's response: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

"Spaz" wrote in message
. ..
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...11_40_5903.jpg

You'd think the sun would be big enough to light up the whole scene in
this shot, and not just one tiny little area.

It's also interesting that the horizon only comes up to middle of the
poser's head, and less then shoulder heighth of the photographer. Wow,
that's one TINY little moon!

I also find it interesting that the shadows of the two people's
reflections off the helmet have such a huge difference in the length of
their shadows.

There are many more inconsistencies in lighting that prove than in no way
was this photo taken on the moon. I'll let you find them. I'll give you
a hint. Can you say BACKDROP?

This is a studio photo.

Just kill file him. If he can't do a web search to find out the answers
to his questions, he's not worth bothering about.

A search on "moonhoax" is not that difficult for somebody of average
intellect to do.

Malcolm B

"Spaz" wrote in message
. ..
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/...11_40_5903.jpg

[conspiracy bull****]

The picture was taken by the lone camera man on the grassy knoll.

I just got an idea.

Anyone really good with Photoshop here?

If so, put together a picture of the lunar surface based upon what it should
look like, on film, to the conspiracists...

I.e., glaring surface, perfectly perpendicular shadows (regardless of
terrain), stars visible everywhere in the sky, big dust storms, etc...

You should do this

call it a faked real

in fact you have just invented a whole new genre of
photoshopped art - the faked real shot made up to
convince a loon that they are wrong...

brilliant

start a blog, sell advertised swamp land and craters
to loons only (don't break the law tho)

Get some funding from Mr Oberg

and you will be rich
this could even extend to HOLLYWOOD
just read up on Jungian Archetypes and Junk DNA
(as applied to the loon that is)
and get working on the screenplay


congratulations!



"Eric" wrote in message
.. .
I just got an idea.

Anyone really good with Photoshop here?

If so, put together a picture of the lunar surface based upon what it
should look like, on film, to the conspiracists...

I.e., glaring surface, perfectly perpendicular shadows (regardless of
terrain), stars visible everywhere in the sky, big dust storms, etc...

"Eric" wrote in message
.. .
I just got an idea.

Anyone really good with Photoshop here?

If so, put together a picture of the lunar surface based upon what it
should look like, on film, to the conspiracists...

I.e., glaring surface, perfectly perpendicular shadows (regardless of
terrain), stars visible everywhere in the sky, big dust storms, etc...


How about this one:

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/moontruth.php

Enjoy!

George