![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That thing's fringgin' TINY......I think you'd have more space in the X-20
Dyna Soar, lol! Of course, it would have taken a Titan 3 to launch the X-20, and the X-37 just needs a Delta 3...... Is this really progress, or does it seem in many ways we're going BACKWARDS in manned spaceflight? "Jacques van Oene" wrote in message ... Dave Drachlis Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala. (Phone: 256/544-0034) RELEASE: 03-126 X-37 TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATOR COMPLETES STRUCTURAL TESTS IN PREPARATION FOR ATMOSPHERIC FLIGHT TEST PROGRAM An approach and landing test version of the X-37, a spacecraft designed to demonstrate technologies for NASA's Orbital Space Plane Program, successfully completed structural testing in Huntington Beach, Calif. The series of ground-based, proof tests are intended to verify the structural integrity of the X-37 Approach and Landing Test Vehicle. The tests apply pressure to the vehicle, simulating flight stresses and loads the X-37 may encounter in flight. "An initial review of the test data indicates that the vehicle performed as expected, and we are very pleased," said Dan Dumbacher, X-37 project manager at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. "Following a detailed analysis of the results the X-37 Atmospheric Vehicle will be returned to its assembly facility in Palmdale, Calif., for preparation for atmospheric flight testing." "We are proud of the government and Boeing X-37 team for meeting the challenge and aggressively moving toward flight testing of the Approach and Landing Test Vehicle," said Dumbacher. The Approach and Landing Test Vehicle is one of two vehicles that comprise the X-37 Advanced Technology Flight Demonstrator Project. An orbital version of the vehicle is being developed to test and validate technologies in the environment of space and will test vehicle system performance during orbital flight, reentry and landing. Technologies to be demonstrated include thermal protection systems; autonomous advanced guidance, navigation and control systems; high temperature structures; conformal reusable insulation; and high temperature seals. Both vehicles are developed by Boeing Expendable Launch Systems of Huntington Beach, Calif. Atmospheric flight tests of the Approach and Landing Test Vehicle are scheduled for 2004 and flight tests of the Orbital Vehicle are scheduled for 2006. Flight demonstrators like the X-37 have a critical role in validating technologies that cannot be demonstrated on the ground. NASA is pursuing these and other space launch technologies that will enable the Agency to achieve its goal of establishing safe, reliable and affordable access to space. For more information, visit: http://www.ospnews.com -end- Below are links to this news release on our Web site and also to related photos. The Web News release http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/n...03/03-126.html Photos http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/news/photos/2003/photos03-126.html For releases sent directly to you, contact: Marshall Space Flight Center Media Relations Department (256) 544-0034 (256) 544-5852 (fax) ---- Jacques :-) Editor: www.spacepatches.info ------------------------------------------------------ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joseph S. Powell, III" wrote:
That thing's fringgin' TINY......I think you'd have more space in the X-20 Dyna Soar, lol! Of course, it would have taken a Titan 3 to launch the X-20, and the X-37 just needs a Delta 3...... Is this really progress, or does it seem in many ways we're going BACKWARDS in manned spaceflight? It *is* a test vehicle, after all. Wind tunnel models of the 747 didn't have to be 1:1 scale, either. Neither was X-33 as large as VentureStar. They just have to be large enough to be developmentally realistic. And even as a final size, it doesn't have to be manned. Think of the end result as an orbital, reusable RPV. If you don't need Hubble-sized optics, all sorts of spooky stuff can be put in a fairly small volume. Espically when you expect to get it back (which means you can use hi-res film, and plan to physically sample stuff), and if necessary, modify it for re-flight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed Martin scores success with landing technology tests for a future astronaut crew | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 21st 04 03:44 AM |
Lockheed Martin scores success with landing technology tests for a future astronaut crew | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 3 | July 20th 04 06:21 PM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
NASA's International Space Station Science control center updates information technology while cutting costs | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 3rd 03 06:42 PM |
NASA Selects Commercial Space Ride For Technology Experiment | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | September 4th 03 06:15 PM |