A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Brad Guth wrote:

Would you folks like to see some other examples of our moon as having
been photographed along with other planets and stars,

No.

or would you care
to discuss the lethal gamma and hard-X-ray aspects of our naked moon
that's a bit worse off radiation dosage than whatever's the worse
dosage of our Van Allen belts have to offer?

No.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development