![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12319764/ quote NASA keeps mum on space robot’s failure DART report considered too sensitive for public release .... The space agency distributed a new public information policy last month specifying that information protected by ITAR is considered "sensitive but unclassified" and that unauthorized release to news organizations could result in prosecution or disciplinary action. end quote It appears there is more to the story than what is presented in Mr. Oberg's story. A quick look at the NASA web site shows: http://search.nasa.gov/nasasearch/se...de=dart+report That many of the DART documents appear to have the date of "30 Mar 06", when in fact the documents are from various dates prior to March 30, 2006. Pure speculation, but it appears that these documents may have been pulled off the NASA web site, then put back on the web site on March 30th of this year. Hence the wrong date. Did NASA post-facto edit these documents? Did all the documents make it back on to the NASA web site? Are previously released documents too sensitive for public release? Inquiring minds would like to know. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dart too sensitive for public release? | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 24 | April 24th 06 02:40 PM |
Dart too sensitive for public release? | Craig Fink | Space Station | 24 | April 24th 06 02:40 PM |
DART mishap report | Pat Flannery | Policy | 3 | December 13th 05 06:52 PM |
What Did RAYMOND DART Say About All This? | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 03 10:38 AM |
Final Release of Quasars.Org: 48,215 QSOs and 100,343 QSO candidates | Eric Flesch | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 4th 03 01:08 PM |