![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much shielding is necessary to protect electronics etc. from
permanent damage from the particle flux of solar flares? Or, for that matter, from cosmic radiation? I'm assuming that most current satellites do not carry the heavy shielding required to protect them from strong flares (doesn't look that way from pictures etc.). What happens to them then during heavy flare activity? Do they just shut down, roll with the punches, and then get restarted? What about all these iron particles travelling at almost relativistic speeds? Surely that can do a lot of damage to electronics? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
G. Stewart wrote: How much shielding is necessary to protect electronics etc. from permanent damage from the particle flux of solar flares? Or, for that matter, from cosmic radiation? Depends on what it is you want. The dominant radiation problem for most space hardware -- which is in low Earth orbit -- is neither flares nor cosmic rays, but Earth's Van Allen belts. And that problem is minor enough in LEO that for missions of modest duration, a bit of care in the circuit design suffices. For long durations, the typical approach is extra attention to choosing radiation-resistant parts, rather than adding shielding. Out in deep space, flares are the major issue. The preference is, again, to choose radiation-resistant parts rather than attempting shielding, because shielding is often prohibitively heavy. Occasionally some attempt will be made to shield highly-susceptible parts, when they must be included for some reason. It is impractical to shield solar arrays, and they are simply oversized so that they can tolerate a certain amount of reduction in their output due to radiation exposure. Cosmic rays generally are not much of an issue for electronics. They may cause transient upsets, which require some design attention, but the dose rate isn't high enough for accumulated permanent damage to be a real problem. I'm assuming that most current satellites do not carry the heavy shielding required to protect them from strong flares (doesn't look that way from pictures etc.). What happens to them then during heavy flare activity? Do they just shut down, roll with the punches, and then get restarted? Mostly, they notice some small drop in output from their solar arrays, and their electronics hiccup occasionally. Very sensitive parts like detectors in some instruments may get powered down at times of high activity, since damage is less likely with no power applied. What about all these iron particles travelling at almost relativistic speeds? Surely that can do a lot of damage to electronics? There are not enough of them to be a major concern for electronics. -- MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Another Solar Storm Reaches Earth; Largest Flare On Record | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 7th 03 04:12 PM |
Enormous X-Ray Solar Flare Seen By SOHO | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 28th 03 07:26 PM |
Radiation shielding for hotel at GEO? | Richard Lamb | Technology | 7 | August 25th 03 08:17 PM |