![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was just reading an article on the anniversaries of the three major tragedies in American spaceflight. I never paid much attention to the dates of the tragedies before. The article had the dates listed - January 27 - Apollo 1 fire. January 28 -Challenger explosion, and February 1 - Columbia accident. Isn't it strange that all three accidents have taken place in late January/early February? I find this very strange. Has NASA ever considered not launched at all in January and February? Instead of scrapping the space shuttle just stop all missions during January thru March and they should be safe. Maybe none of the incidents were directly caused by the January and February weather. But still, it's kind of strange all three accidents would take place at the same time of year. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe NASA should hire a staff numerologist
to advise them of the good dates to launch on. ;-) NASA has launched 10 other missions (9 shuttle and Apollo 14) in the Jan 15 - Feb 15 timeframe that were successful. Rusty |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Challenger Disaster, at least, was partially due to an unusual
freeze occuring in Florida at the time. I don't know anything about the weather at the time of the Apollo fire or the STS-107 launch, but I suspect the fact that it hasn't been mentioned probably indicates that it was rather normal January weather in Florida. On the surface, it does seem odd that America's 3 fatal disasters have occured in the same time of the year. (Remember though, that although Columbia burned up on February 1, the launch that caused the fatal damage was on January 16, 2 weeks before. After that debris hit, Columbia was doomed no matter what the re-entry date actually was.) But if you actually work with Statistics, you discover that clumping like this is common. It's like being at a party or club and finding that two people have the same birthday. Or the so-called "20 year curse" on the American Presidency, which actually is more influenced by the American economic-political cycle and longevity factors than any sort of mystic influence. Also, if Apollo 13 had been fatal (which it easily COULD have been), it was in mid-April, completely throwing the pattern down the drain. I don't think the Russian program shows this kind of clumping of their disasters. Does anyone know if there is any sort of clumping by date by unmanned satellite failures? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 2nd 05 06:07 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 2 | November 2nd 05 10:57 PM |
Early CEV Mission | Blurrt | Policy | 76 | February 5th 04 04:45 PM |
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes | Michael Ravnitzky | Space Shuttle | 5 | January 16th 04 04:28 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |