A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd 06, 04:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

Who can tell you more about this than I Treb. I have already told
you using muli-universes answers the question of the 95% missing
gravity. Used our twin universe to show where anti-matter was used to
create our parallel universe To think the cosmos exists with just one
universe is very naive thinking. Our universe is not in the center of
the cosmos. I will keep adding good science thoughts to this
post. Being new and original and not in Google don't let that scare you.
Be brave and keep your mind open. Its the only way. Trebert

  #2  
Old January 23rd 06, 06:29 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes


G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Who can tell you more about this than I Treb. I have already told
you using muli-universes answers the question of the 95% missing
gravity. Used our twin universe to show where anti-matter was used to
create our parallel universe To think the cosmos exists with just one
universe is very naive thinking. Our universe is not in the center of
the cosmos. I will keep adding good science thoughts to this
post. Being new and original and not in Google don't let that scare you.
Be brave and keep your mind open. Its the only way. Trebert



In order to explain the apparent missing mass in the galaxy, and the
expansion of the universe, much wild speculation has been made. Dark
matter, dark energy, and even parallel universes have been invoked.
But maybe gravity just isn't as simple as Newton's equation:

F = G m_1 m_2 / r^2.

How do we know the equation only has one term?

Nature isn't compelled to conform to simplicity. The ancients thought
that all the heavenly bodies moved in perfect circles. Even Copernicus
thought the Earth and planets moved in perfect circles. Something
might be moving in more than on circle (epicycles), but all motion was
basically circular.

But Kepler discovered that nature was not that simple. The planets
moved in ellipses, not circles.

So why should gravity be so simple as Newton's equation?

Perhaps it could be better described by an equation with more than one
term. Something like this:

F = -G_0 m_1 m_2 + G_1 m_1 m_2 /r + G_2 m_1 m_2 / r^2

where G_0 G_1 G_2

so the third term would predominant at the distances we usually measure
in our solar system and G_2 would be equal to the gravitational
constant we know.

But at galactic distances, the second term would become predominant,
and gravity would be greater at long distances than we would expect
form our old equation.

At very large distances, the first term would become predominant, and
G_0 would be equivalent to Einstein's Cosmological Constant, and
gravity would become repulsive.

It still doesn't explain how gravity works, but the gravity observed
can be described by this kind of a smooth mathematical model, then it
is how gravity essentially works and you can stop looking for missing
matter or energy to fudge your results with.

Now see how long till the Chinese steal my idea!

Double-A

  #3  
Old January 24th 06, 10:37 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

Start with Membranes,because the membrane of waters surface tension
comes to mind. This membrane is very strong and can hold up a long piece
of steel. A needle shows if you place it nicely(not break the membrane
it will appear like it is floating but actually it is being held up by
electrons. Electrons keep it from falling through the water. The needle
is not wet. Just had this thought. A solid ball 8 feet in diameter of
very hard steel weights a lot and is made very smooth. It is placed on a
flat surface made of the same very hard shinny material This begs the
question how much area is the ball resting on? is it just a point.
Both are so hard they do not bend(compress) at point of contact. The
steel sphere, must weigh in at 30 tons or more. The point of contact is
so very small. Are electrons all that strong These are the thoughts
going through my mind that might help us understand the strength of
membranes. Thoughts jump in that membrane strength might be created
by or in proportion to tension of the strings(using string theory)
Maybe I should think of Planck energy. Please bear with me on this
post for I'm trying to do the hardest part first. First thought on
membrane dimensions they are two dimensional. Not much thickness to
surface tension membrane on water. Still what if adding dimensions adds
strength like in a added weave. What if a membrane strength is
proportional to the number of electrons and positrons Hmmmm Well just
throwing thoughts up at the ceiling to see which might stick(fit)
TreBert

  #4  
Old January 24th 06, 10:49 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

Double -A We know how gravity works. We don't know what makes it work.
Missing dark matter immersed in space like dust shows itself when light
tries to shine through. Reality is dark energy of different objects have
been found. Dark energy is tricky stuff,so tricky I can't thing of it
other than neutrinos,and virtual photons TreBert

  #5  
Old January 25th 06, 01:41 AM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Double -A We know how gravity works. We don't know what makes it work.
Missing dark matter immersed in space like dust shows itself when light
tries to shine through. Reality is dark energy of different objects have
been found. Dark energy is tricky stuff,so tricky I can't thing of it
other than neutrinos,and virtual photons TreBert


Please Trebert!

More on the Twin theory!!! Time is running out ...

L

Bee



  #6  
Old January 25th 06, 04:39 AM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

Bee To know how Bert and I think I asked you to go into Google and read
about 100 "What ifs" The fact that we have a parrel universe and I
was able to enter Bert's(yours) by brain waves is very tricky stuff. It
begins with the big bang that created all there is in both universes.
Bee I don't know how knowledgeable you are on how particles are
created?? So let me tell you this When matter is created from
energy,it is created in the form of particle-antiparticle "pairs" That
is true for universes and just as true for Bert and I Bee it might be
faster if you asked the questions about this "twin theory",and I will
give you the answers. Like nightbat told me you are a very busy
girl.,and I( know your music must be a big part of your life(time)
TreBert

  #7  
Old January 25th 06, 12:25 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Bee To know how Bert and I think I asked you to go into Google and read
about 100 "What ifs" The fact that we have a parrel universe and I
was able to enter Bert's(yours) by brain waves is very tricky stuff. It
begins with the big bang that created all there is in both universes.
Bee I don't know how knowledgeable you are on how particles are
created?? So let me tell you this When matter is created from
energy,it is created in the form of particle-antiparticle "pairs" That
is true for universes and just as true for Bert and I Bee it might be
faster if you asked the questions about this "twin theory",and I will
give you the answers. Like nightbat told me you are a very busy
girl.,and I( know your music must be a big part of your life(time)
TreBert


Trebert ,, I will think to ask the right questions ...

Is it like where there is a yin there is a yang but in twitilght terms??

Does it have anything to do with mind plane, astral, causal, ethric, ...
What do you think about Soul??

l
Bee



  #8  
Old January 25th 06, 01:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

Bee Twilight does not fit. I use twilight years,as showing the end is
near. Soul fits better for is is a rational emotion in man's thoughts.
Can form an entity distinct from and can exist independently of his
body.Bert and I can most certainly agree on that. Bert and I are
identical,and can only be distinguished by my superior thinking. Bee I
have a gut feeling you put a lot of "soul" into your music. People
with lack of soul can never communicate with their parrel anti twin.
They can never break through the membrane the cosmos creates to separate
universes Sad but true TreBert

  #9  
Old January 25th 06, 03:20 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Bee Twilight does not fit. I use twilight years,as showing the end is
near. Soul fits better for is is a rational emotion in man's thoughts.
Can form an entity distinct from and can exist independently of his
body.Bert and I can most certainly agree on that. Bert and I are
identical,and can only be distinguished by my superior thinking. Bee I
have a gut feeling you put a lot of "soul" into your music. People
with lack of soul can never communicate with their parrel anti twin.
They can never break through the membrane the cosmos creates to separate
universes Sad but true TreBert


So, are you a mixing together of Treb and Bert?
I thought that would like blow a hole in the universe or something. snkhee
hee

Lomie


  #10  
Old January 25th 06, 04:49 PM posted to alt.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gravity Parallel Universes added Dimensions,and Membranes


"Lomie" wrote in message

snkhee hee



IDIOT !!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gravity 1A - Back to the Drawing Board Golden Boar Misc 59 January 12th 06 11:18 PM
NASA HISTORY COMPUTER STOLDEN --- UNIVERSAL DATABASE ON A CHIP .... zetasum History 1 February 19th 05 06:08 PM
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! zetasum Space Station 0 February 4th 05 11:10 PM
All technology outdated betalimit Policy 0 September 20th 04 03:41 PM
Further proof gravity is a push... Rick Sobie Astronomy Misc 1 March 16th 04 06:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.