![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How critical is it to have telescope accessories that are apochromatic
if one *does not* intend to do photography? I ask because, and maybe it's because I have not done any *quality* observing, I have yet to experience any color in the eyepiece beyond the Martian tint. OTOH, I have seen much color in images... As I do not intend to do photography, should this specification be a consideration? Would not want to spend extra for quality outside the capabilities of the human eye.... Wasted quality, sort of speak... TIA, Errol NOLA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Cooke Triplet: Answering Another of My Own Silly Apochromat Questions | Chris1011 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | December 5th 04 06:47 AM |
Apochromat vs. Photo lens. | Ed Majden | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | February 7th 04 06:08 PM |
Barlow Lenses | jojo | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | September 20th 03 05:40 AM |