![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
told ya so!
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Crap + Bacteria = Hydrazine!?: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ocketfuel.html Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crap + Bacteria = Hydrazine!?:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...1109_rocketfue... "The unusual microbes consume ammonia, producing hydrazine-better known as rocket fuel-in the process. The ability still puzzles scientists." Most interesting notion of crapolla--hydrazine rocket fuel. Using H2O2 along with just about anything, uncluding "Hydrazine" is also doable. Tossing in a good dosage of LRn might actually become a little nuclear limit pushing but, certainly adding such a highly reactive element as Rn--ions--lead couldn't hurt. Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But would the skivvies be intact???
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeez
Once I get my bio engineered nuclear plasma drive working, you guys wont see me for dust! the little bugs convert poo to hydrazine, which is stored they are also engineered to metabolise heavy elements (Pu) - gedddit peeuuu they are polar so susceptible to electrical fields they are engineered to sense neutron flux, so that they swim around enough to keep the material and geometric buckling critical the hydrazine is ignited causing shock fronts which in turn sends the bugs critical the polar charge on the bugs effects a van der waals screening for inertial confinement fusion is had via magneto acoustic inertial confinement of hydrazine by product remnant charge enables the use of plasma afterburners lightspeed from poo, fancy that? "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Crap + Bacteria = Hydrazine!?: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ocketfuel.html Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&...C4qZPd6Tkkfipk
Project Orion page 124 "The best propellant...equal amounts H C N O...Urea ...ideal..." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Crap + Bacteria = Hydrazine!?: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ocketfuel.html If that works, NASA should be able to entirely eliminate future fuel costs by simply shoving a printout of Guth's posts into the fuel tank. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why NASA has not already gotten us to Mars on their bull**** promises
is the exception that proves the rule.. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Lorrey" wrote in message ups.com... Why NASA has not already gotten us to Mars How big a check have you personally written to NASA to go to Mars? At this point, it's pretty much *only* about money, and NASA doesn't control that. Furthermore, why must NASA do it? Why not encourage the Europeans or even Chinese? Why not assist Zubrin with fundraising? In short, *what are you doing to help*? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turning crap into rocket fuel | Pat Flannery | Policy | 42 | January 7th 06 07:43 PM |
Improved lunar landing architecture | Alex Terrell | Policy | 183 | September 22nd 05 01:32 AM |
Question on shuttle fuel usage on liftoff. | [email protected] | Policy | 3 | June 22nd 05 10:00 PM |
Poison, From the Far Right? (Rocket Fuel...) | Jim Burns | Policy | 49 | March 2nd 05 06:23 PM |
OPINION (Oberg): "Post-Columbia NASA hunkers down" | James Oberg | Space Shuttle | 56 | August 6th 03 09:31 AM |