![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I've a question which has been wandering in my head for a while. Maybe this is not the right place to ask it, but maybe someone could point me to a better place. I'll try to ask it as easy as possible. According to my calculations, the difference between the longest distance from earth to the sun and the shorstest one are about 4.8 millions of kilometers. Why the temperature doesn't drastically change because of this? If this is because of radiation doesn't being too important this far from the sun, Where can I find a equation which relates radiation with distance? Hope you can help me clear my mind. Regards, -- Beto |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Beto wrote: According to my calculations, the difference between the longest distance from earth to the sun and the shorstest one are about 4.8 millions of kilometers. That is at least roughly correct. Why the temperature doesn't drastically change because of this? Partly because Earth has a lot of thermal inertia: changes in the amount of sunlight don't change its temperature quickly. Partly because in the Northern Hemisphere, where most of the people live, this trend is opposed to the seasons: Earth is closest to the Sun in January -- Northern Hemisphere winter -- so the changes due to distance are hidden by the normal seasonal changes. If this is because of radiation doesn't being too important this far from the sun, Where can I find a equation which relates radiation with distance? Light intensity varies (to a good approximation) inversely with the square of distance. -- MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer wrote:
Beto wrote: According to my calculations, the difference between the longest distance from earth to the sun and the shorstest one are about 4.8 millions of kilometers. That is at least roughly correct. Why the temperature doesn't drastically change because of this? Partly because Earth has a lot of thermal inertia: changes in the amount of sunlight don't change its temperature quickly. Partly because in the Northern Hemisphere, where most of the people live, this trend is opposed to the seasons: Earth is closest to the Sun in January -- Northern Hemisphere winter -- so the changes due to distance are hidden by the normal seasonal changes. Also because 4.8 million out of 150 million is really not much difference. It makes a difference of about 3% in light intensity, hence of about 0.075% in equilibrium absolute temperature, i.e. about 2 degrees C, or 3 degrees F. If this is because of radiation doesn't being too important this far from the sun, Where can I find a equation which relates radiation with distance? Light intensity varies (to a good approximation) inversely with the square of distance. And equilibrium temperature varies with the fourth root of light intensity. Another way to look at it is: take the fourth root of the proportion of the sky (including the half below the horizon) taken up by the sun, and multiply that by the surface temperature of the sun, and you get what the temperature of the earth ought to be. It won't be quite right since the earth isn't a perfect black body, but it will be close. This works for all planets, asteroids, comets, space probes, etc., so long as nearly all their heat comes from the sun, and so long as they spend no time in the shade (e.g. of a nearby planet). -- Keith F. Lynch - - http://keithlynch.net/ I always welcome replies to my e-mail, postings, and web pages, but unsolicited bulk e-mail (spam) is not acceptable. Please do not send me HTML, "rich text," or attachments, as all such email is discarded unread. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Keith F. Lynch wrote: Also because 4.8 million out of 150 million is really not much difference. It makes a difference of about 3% in light intensity... Remember, it's a square law: a 3% difference in distance turns into about a 7% difference in light. (However, Keith is correct to point out that the fourth-root law for temperature greatly reduces the impact of this.) -- MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Keith F. Lynch
wrote: Also because 4.8 million out of 150 million is really not much difference. It makes a difference of about 3% in light intensity, hence of about 0.075% in equilibrium absolute temperature, i.e. about 2 degrees C, or 3 degrees F. 4.8/150 = 3.2% in distance, which causes 6.5% change in intensity by inverse square, and taking the fourth root of 1+that gives 1.6% temperature change, or 4 degrees C. -- David M. Palmer (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|