How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?

The following two questions were remained as a mystery in the history
of atomic physics:

1=2E How can the orbital electron rotate permanently without energy
supply?

2=2E How can the orbital electron keeps its position without merging into
its nucleus if its kinetic energy balances delicately with its
potential energy when applied an external pressure on it?

However, Dr. Hansik Yoon's Universal Atomic Model easily solved these
two critical questions. The electron building a tiny persistent current
ring is no more a mass particle, but a continuous entity with a perfect
elasticity. It is connected to its nucleus with electromagnetic force
fluxes, and performs a torsional harmonic oscillation to emit or absorb
external electromagnetic radiations. The nuclear attraction balances
with the Meissoner's diamagnetic repulsion induced by the orbital
electron ring.

The orbital electron ring can approach limitlessly to its nucleus to
form a neutron. The nearer the distance between its nucleus, the
greater the frequency of electromagnetic waves it emits and vise versa.
Thus the energy order of the Yoon's Universal Atomic Model is quite in
reverse to that of current model.

Based on his atomic model, Dr. Yoon deals with numerous scientific
subjects without relying on any existing scientific principles or
theories such as the Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics which were
built on the false premises.

Many controversial subjects of modern natural science ranging from
micro-organism to cosmology were explained seamlessly from the Yoon=E2=80=
=99s
atomic model's viewpoint in Dr. Yoon's book.

Dr. Yoon's book titled "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model"
is revolutionary, denying many scientific principles proposed during
the last 20th century. The book has its own web site
(http://www.yoonsatom.net).

For example, Dr. Yoon discovered new relationship between electricity
and magnetism, and the character of Meissoner's magnetism induced by
orbital electron rings which is somewhat different from ordinary
magnetism of solenoid-current system. Dr. Yoon also discussed the flaws
of the wave-particle dualism, the flaws of current chemical bounds, the
flaws of de Broglei's mass wave theory, as well as the flaws of
Heigenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

He discloses that the equation, E=3Dh=CE=BD in the quantum theory, and the
equation E=3Dmc^2 in the relativity theory are scientifically
meaningless.

The hydrogen spectrum that was thought impossible to explain it without
quantizing radiation energy, was explained by Dr. Yoon more elegantly
than existing one, by building a mathematical model based on a pure
innate human intelligence.

With the same equation applied for the hydrogen spectrum, Dr. Yoon
could explain the mechanism of generating x-rays, and gamma-rays, as
well as atomic nuclear fission and fusion energy.

Based on the same principle, Dr. Yoon could define the nuclear strong
force, which is mysteriously remained up to the present, the
essentiality of =CE=B1, =CE=B2, and gamma-rays, and the mechanism of how
element atoms including radioactive atoms being built in the sun or
other stars.

If you read his text book you will surprisingly find that the cosmic
gases such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium are not the fuel source of
nuclear fusion in the sun, but are mere ashes exhausted to emit their
structural energy.

Dr. Hansik Yoon explains the real mechanism of superconductor, real
nature of light, real mechanism of diffraction and refraction of light,
speed of light, mechanism of NMR and IR spectrum, and laser light, with
entirely different principles from existing knowledge.

Dr. Yoon discovered the full electron numbers in each electron shell of
atomic structure, by peer reviewing the periodicity of element atoms.
It is, 2, 8, 8, 2, 8, 8 (18), 2, 8, 8 (18), 8, 8, 8, 8 (32), 8, 8, 8, 8
(32), 2, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8 (50). it is constituted with number 2 and 8.

This basic periodicity tells us surprisingly a lot of unknown
information in the atomic physics such as atomic valency under 7,
electro-negativity of element atoms, physical properties of element
atoms such as the structure of metals, melting and freezing points of
materials, and more.

Based on Dr. Yoon's "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model"
(http://www.yoonsatom.net).

Wrong, the background keeps the electron moving. The electron has a
mean nuclear distance, but this is averaged from spending most of its
time /in/ the nucleus and spending the rest of its time toward
infinity. And learn the difference between rotating (spinning) and
revolving (trending). The electron, not the orbital, is a spinning
mass ring in a charge dome. The orbital path is chaotic because it
plays off its ghost twin:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...8a47880cdaab95.

The periodic numbers are not "2 and 8" but 2*1 and 2*1+2*3.

-Aut

"Autymn D. C." wrote in message
oups.com...
Wrong, the background keeps the electron moving.

What background is this?, by exactly what process does it keep it moving?,
and the experimental evidence whose only reasonable interpretation it this
process is located at what peer reviewed journal?

The electron has a
mean nuclear distance, but this is averaged from spending most of its
time /in/ the nucleus and spending the rest of its time toward
infinity.

And when it is at infinity exactly what brings it back to the nucleus?

And learn the difference between rotating (spinning) and
revolving (trending).

I think you should learn some basic QM and acquaint yourself with the wave
particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Bill

The electron, not the orbital, is a spinning
mass ring in a charge dome. The orbital path is chaotic because it
plays off its ghost twin:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...8a47880cdaab95.

The periodic numbers are not "2 and 8" but 2*1 and 2*1+2*3.

-Aut

Bill Hobba wrote:
What background is this?, by exactly what process does it keep it moving?,
and the experimental evidence whose only reasonable interpretation it this
process is located at what peer reviewed journal?

I already answered these in my indexed posts about classical orbitals.
Now tell me how can an orbital, with its mean potential well-defined,
exist well beyond that into infinity without a classical perturbation?

And when it is at infinity exactly what brings it back to the nucleus?

It's not at infinity.

I think you should learn some basic QM and acquaint yourself with the wave
particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

I think you should acquaint yourself with my past messages doing away
with these.

-Aut

"Autymn D. C." wrote in message
ups.com...
Bill Hobba wrote:
What background is this?, by exactly what process does it keep it
moving?,
and the experimental evidence whose only reasonable interpretation it
this
process is located at what peer reviewed journal?

I already answered these in my indexed posts about classical orbitals.

Then refresh my memory.

Now tell me how can an orbital, with its mean potential well-defined,
exist well beyond that into infinity without a classical perturbation?

Orbitals do not extend to infinity - meaning it has a finite probability of
being found at infinity - by the very definition of what an orbit is.


And when it is at infinity exactly what brings it back to the nucleus?

It's not at infinity.

Then be precise about what you mean by 'toward infinity.'


I think you should learn some basic QM and acquaint yourself with the
wave
particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

I think you should acquaint yourself with my past messages doing away
with these.

I have. They are basically senseless nonsense.

Bill


-Aut

Bill Hobba wrote:
Then refresh my memory.

Look them up.

Orbitals do not extend to infinity - meaning it has a finite probability of
being found at infinity - by the very definition of what an orbit is.

I said toward, not into.

I have. They are basically senseless nonsense.

Your rejection is senseless nonsense.

In article . com,
"Autymn D. C." wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
What background is this?, by exactly what process does it keep it moving?,
and the experimental evidence whose only reasonable interpretation it this
process is located at what peer reviewed journal?

I already answered these in my indexed posts about classical orbitals.
Now tell me how can an orbital, with its mean potential well-defined,
exist well beyond that into infinity without a classical perturbation?

And when it is at infinity exactly what brings it back to the nucleus?

It's not at infinity.

I think you should learn some basic QM and acquaint yourself with the wave
particle duality and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

I think you should acquaint yourself with my past messages doing away
with these.

-Aut

Will you do away with atoms next?

Imbecile^2.

Lloyd Parker wrote:
Will you do away with atoms next?

The literal body is not uncut.

Imbecile^2.

you

newedana wrote:
The following two questions were remained as a mystery in the history
of atomic physics:

1. How can the orbital electron rotate permanently without energy
supply?

2. How can the orbital electron keeps its position without merging into
its nucleus if its kinetic energy balances delicately with its
potential energy when applied an external pressure on it?


*Plonk*

How can a planet rotate permanently without energy supply? After all,
it's accelerating non-stop.

That's what gets me.