Particle Radii

Y.Porat wrote: just lets try very simple logic;
if we agree that a combination of two particles is longish
and another condition - the bond is constant and fixed

what is more reasonable to think
that we have here two 'balls' side by side?

..Dumb-bell.?!!

so what is the point of connection is it one point?
if yes why rather that point and not another one.

or may be two longish shapes? that has 'poles' and the connection
is only at the poles?

..OBLONG, Dumb-bell.?!!

moreover:
how about the possibility that even that 'basic particle' is
actually not 'basic but composed of sub particles ??

so if a conglomerating of sub- particles than again we are in the
'direction of' the longish shape ??!!

..albeit, HEAVY-weight OBlong, Dumb-bell.?!!

have you hear ed about the 'string theory'?

ONE HEAVY-weight OBlong Dumb-bell Theory at a time.!!

have you hear ed about the 'chain of orbitals' theory??

CHAiNs are descretely CONTiNOUS strings of MOLAR particles.!!

brian a m stuckless


have you seen a protein molecule? (not to mention the Genome)

have you seen the shape of a lightening (that might as well
be a shape of a chain of orbitals or may be based on it ?)
if not it is just material for new thinking.

ATB
Y.Porat
-------------------